ipl-logo

Essay On Jury Nullification

640 Words3 Pages

We hypothesized that when mock jurors are given a nullification instruction in a marijuana case they are more likely to find the defendant innocent, compared to mock jurors who do not receive jury nullification instruction. In our study, data trended in favor of a lower likelihood of a guilty verdict when nullification instructions were given, whereas previous research has provided clear indication of the influence of jury nullification instruction on jury decision. (Horowitz, 1985; Schuller & Rzepa, 2002) However, the trend found in our study is consistent with findings of previous studies, which have provided support for the influence of jury nullification instruction in various legal scenarios. (Hill & Pfeifer, 1992; Kerwin & Schaffer, 1991; Schuller & Rzepa, 2002)
Regardless of the type of legal case, jurors who are presented jury nullification instructions are more likely to draw conclusions based upon their own conscience rather than consult legal policies during deliberation, which affects the resulting verdict. Conscious collective decisions are the most likely outcome, as jurors are granted the right to reject the law as they see fit. Due to this, the use of nullification instructions may continue to decline, as has occurred over the last century. (Smith, 1999) …show more content…

Policy changes could affect various aspects of society, including but not limited to potentially affecting the number of drug convictions each year. While the intended purpose of the use of nullification instructions is not to change the laws in place (Cornell University Law School, 1992), established policies could be changed in the future given consistent nullification verdicts are rendered in cases that are similar in context (i.e. euthanasia; marijuana). Policy makers may take nullification verdicts into consideration when forming new laws, and also when modifying existing

Show More
Related
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Usually, although not always, unfairly prejudicial evidence appeals to the jury's emotions rather than intellect.”

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

The jury system originated in England hundreds of years ago. The colonists brought the jury system from England to the United States. In 1733, John Zenger, a printer, printed a newspaper critical for the British Government. His attorney convinced the jury to be in favor for Zenger because his criticisms were true. After this trial, it gave ordinary citizens the freedom of speech and the power to go against the king.

Read More
960 Words | 4 Pages

While this idea may seem logical, some people still argue that the court system should be based on facts and not emotion. However, like stated before, a jury works best if it takes into consideration the actual human side of the case, just like how juries ruled against slave laws in the 1800s. Summary As the case defending jury nullification draws to an end, it is evident that this legal practice is truly benefiting the American court system: Not only does jury nullification prevent unjust laws being enforced, but it also provides more reasonable punishments to criminals and controls the corruption happening in the courtroom.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

A jury is not trained to decide someone’s fate, which is why a judge, as a trained lawyer, should choose the

Read More
1285 Words | 6 Pages

Like the Electoral College, several of the plans made by the Founding Fathers have lost some of their practicality. What worked in the past does not always work in the future, and this is the case for the jury system. The sole reason it was created was to ensure that each citizen was guaranteed a fair trial, which was a main concern due to Britain’s monarchy. In modern times, however, the judicial branch of the United States could easily give every citizen a fair trial with only a judge presiding over the case. It is clear that bench trials are superior to trials by jury because the citizens on juries are unqualified or biased, its benefits do not outweigh its burdens, and its claim to encourage civic duty is false.

Read More
1138 Words | 5 Pages

The American jury system has been around for centuries but all of a sudden, people are trying to change it. Hundreds of years ago in England, the first of the jury systems were adopted. When there was a crime, the accused was brought before a judge and jury (B.E.). The jury, a group of twelve white men, from the area the crime was committed, heard the case and all of the evidence (B.E.). Those 12 men, decided whether or not the person being accused was guilty or not.

Read More
772 Words | 4 Pages

A man sits upon the stand as he hopes for the jury to plead him not guilty. The American Jury System has been in the United States Judicial Branch for over 385 years. The basis of a bench trial is that there is only a Judge that decides whether the accused is guilty or not guilty. Whereas on a jury trial the fate of the accused is proposed to the jury and they would decide whether he is guilty or not guilty. The jury trials provide fairness, it represents citizenship, and there is less of a bias than that of a bench trial.

Read More
1122 Words | 5 Pages

Over the years, a plethora of court cases have caused Americans to wonder: is our jury system indeed as wondrous as it is conceived to be? To explain, the jury system is the concept of giving the defendant in a trial the option of either having a bench trial, one where a judge alone reaches a verdict, or a trial by jury, one where a group of twelve ordinary citizens is chosen to reach a verdict on the case. One may wonder why a dozen everyday denizens are being endowed with the absolute power over a possibly life or death decision in the life of a neighbor that is unknown to them, but the framers of the United States Constitution believed that this was the most democratic option in making sure that justice is properly served. Explaining further,

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

The American Jury System offers the United States citizens an opportunity to be proven guilty or innocent when a crime has been committed. The twelve person jury system was established in England hundreds of years ago. Originally this system was made up of twelve men and this was huge because they had the power to go against what the judge wanted in court. There are many vital points as to why our American jury system is successful; jury trials by the numbers, ownership by jury members towards the accused, how reliable or unreliable evidence is viewed by jurors, gender balance and the detailed screening process in which jurors are selected.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

“Observers of the American jury system have remarked on its ability to elevate ordinary citizens into self-governors.” (Document C, 293) Many people complain about the amount of government control that there is in America. This is one of the things that gives us a say in our government. This allows us to govern ourselves and work our hardest to choose the correct verdict for the case.

Read More
773 Words | 4 Pages

“Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything.” This quote stated by George Bernard Shaw represents America’s jury system perfectly. We should ultimately eliminate the jury system from court, and use the bench system in all criminal and civil cases. Although there are many reasons why eliminating the jury system is a better choice, many people want to keep the jury system only because we have used it for a long time and they fear change. Without change, progress is impossible and those who want to keep the jury system should change their mind.

Read More
1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More
1483 Words | 6 Pages

In his tragedies Shakespeare closely follows the expectations of his Elizabethan audience in constructing supernatural beings. For instance in Hamlet we get an insight into the popular superstitions of ghosts. Shakespeare incorporates all the generally accepted ideas about ghosts to convince and captivate his audience. The play begins with the appearance of Hamlet’s father’s ghost who is introduced on a cold, and dark night. The silence of the night is emphasised by the ghost’s inability to speak unless spoken to.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

He steps forward to see a luminous light yearning for his attention causing curiosity to overflow through the bones of his body. The feel of the radiating spark is exhilarating, rapidly rushing adrenaline through his veins. His soul fills with extraordinary hope and a newfound love for life, yet he is left with the pain and sorrow of what could have been. Jonas’s light in the novel, The Giver, is the opening of the real world outside of his rigid, cruel society and what it has to offer. Throughout The Giver, the sled was an extremely powerful motif that was crucial to the general theme of the book; time is the essence of change.

Read More
1472 Words | 6 Pages

In this paragraph, the advantages and disadvantages of trial by jury will be discussed. The main advantages are that juries introduce community values into the legal process and can influence the system (Joyce, 2013); they can achieve a sense of equity and fairness without enforcing unjust laws; in addition, juries are independent and neutral (Davies, 2015). Moreover, they guarantee participation from the public in a democratic institution (Hostettler, 2004), and represent the population thanks to the randomness with which jurors are decided (Davies, 2015). On the other hand, the most important disadvantages are that jurors have no prior contact with the courts, no training (Hostettler, 2004) and therefore they lack knowledge of law, courtroom proceedings (Joyce, 2013), and lack of ability to understand the legal directions (Thomas, 2010). Moreover, they must face evidence which is highly technical (Hostettler, 2004).

Read More

More about Essay On Jury Nullification

Related Topics

Open Document