In the 1970s, the drinking age had been lowered to 18, in all 50 states, due to demand and influence by other states. This had increased the drunk driving rate by 30% and during this time, it caused the highest drunk driving accidents in a lot of the American history (Issues & Controversies). This isn’t something that needs or wants to be repeated by lowering the drinking age once again. To start, one reason to not lower the drinking age is it could increase the chances of drug use. If the MLDA was lowered from 21 to 18 it would cause people to irresponsibly drink in nightclubs, not be as safe when in this environment, and could also easily increase the risk of drug use (Procon). To continue, a law that is working for us in this country shouldn’t be changed. Drinking should stay a higher age since the MLDA 21 has reduced alcohol consumption by younger drinkers in the U.S. as well as younger kids in general don’t have as easy access to alcohol with the drinking age higher (Procon). Finally, alcohol consumption can cause serious health problems on kids of all ages, who drink it. If there is a kid who drinks alcohol before the body is fully developed, it can cause serious damage to many parts of the body, and is in general not a very healthy choice for someone's health in general (NYLN). It’s simple to say that with these facts, lowering the drinking age is a dangerous choice. …show more content…
For example, as it is stated in the article “Should the Drinking Age Be Lowered From 21 to a Younger Age” is says, “A peer-reviewed study from the Journal of Studies of Alcohol and Drugs found that the younger a person begins to drink alcohol the more likely it is that they will use other illicit drugs.” This is showing the readers that when someone drinks more, they get and even more likely chance of using drugs that are illegal, and not knowing much about it in the