ipl-logo

Essay On Missouri Compromise

1413 Words6 Pages

Slavery has always been a recurring issue throughout the history of the United States. Although he did not consider himself an abolitionist, John Quincy Adams, the second president of the United States, made his anti-slavery sentiment during and after his term in office. Back then, either you supported slavery or you did not. There were many pinnacle moments throughout the United States’ history that fluctuated the necessity of slaves such as economic demand for certain cash crops, inventions that allowed mass production, and mostly importantly, anti-slavery news articles and books. At the top of this peak, was Missouri Compromise, which literally divided the nation into two different ideologies, although many Northerners also were not fond of blacks. Nonetheless, it paved the way for future events that lead to what seemed to have been an inevitable civil war, in a way it was a last ditch effort to avoid further conflict but it only increased the tensions. With the quick expansion towards the west, it was difficult to keep an even amount of representatives from both sides of the …show more content…

With expansion comes the question of which new states will be admitted as free and which ones will be admitted as slave. The answer to this question was the Missouri compromise. Although the compromise quelled the on the spot divisiveness by turning Missouri into a slave state and Maine as free, it intensified the greater clase between North and South. It clearly demonstrated that the south didn't intend for slavery to finish, they wanted to broaden its presence. The inefficiency behind slavery was being displayed on a global stage, without expansion it cannot survive. The question we have been ignoring as a nation for hundred of years is once again knocking on our door, and while one party wants to do what is right and just, the other party wants to do what is the most

Show More
Related
119 Words | 1 Pages

It can be argued that the Missouri Compromise not only put off the start of the Civil War, but was also a cause. Many contributing factors led up to the Civil War in the years following the passing after the Missouri Compromise. Years after the Missouri Compromise went into effect, Congress passed the Tariff Act of 1833, sometimes called the Compromise Tariff. This was proposed by Henry Clay, and called for the gradual reduction of tariffs, ending the Nullification Crisis. In 1846, United States’ President James Polk requested 2 million dollars to purchase land from Mexico following the Mexican-American War.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

“But this momentous question, like a fireball in The night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union” (Jefferson). This is from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Holmes in 1820 talking about the issue of slavery and the Missouri Compromise, and Thomas Jefferson was afraid that the Congress may keep on compromising to satiate the south’s want for slavery. The people in the north and the south kept I arguing till the Civil War, whether slavery should be continued or if they should get rid of this abominable institution, but Henry Clay did not want there to be a civil war so he helped write a compromise to keep the peace between the feuding halves of America dreaming that peace would be achieved. Even though many people in the south of America through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be beneficial, it ultimately failed, and it only postponed

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

In the era before the Civil War America was expanding westward. The Louisiana Purchase and other lands gained help to give America new land to expand on, but this leaded to issues with the division of free and slave states. As Missouri became a state they wanted to become a slave state, which caused trouble. In order to keep equilibrium between the states, Congress came up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state. The Treaty also made a line within the Louisiana Territory to keep slavery from moving up the

Read More
1569 Words | 7 Pages

This also was a critical event to the coming of the Civil War as it separated the north and south even greater by physically dividing them into two

Read More
1985 Words | 8 Pages

All of this was basically a different interpretation of the United States Constitution on both sides. In the end all of these disagreements on both sides led to the Civil War, in which the North won. There were a few reasons

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Civil War LEQ When the United States admitted more Western territories into the Union, their only goal was to expand the country as much as possible. They did not foresee how extending slavery into western territories could lead to a Civil War. The controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories contributed to the Civil war by politicizing the issue so no politician could be neutral on it, by creating a fight for economic influence between the North and South, and by increasing the feelings superiority/separation between the North and South.

Read More
740 Words | 3 Pages

The country was divided self-consciously with different priorities. The dispute of slavery came to the forefront in American politics, primarily in the South because of their asset in large scale agriculture. The issue came to head when the debate whether the Missouri Territory was going to be entered as a free a state. The result was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Calhoun boldly stated his view from the Senate floor in 1837 that the race-based slavery that was prominent in the South was “instead of an evil, a good- positive good.”

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

For years the Southern States and the Northern States argued over the concept of slavery. It is generally thought that those in the North were the abolitionist and those in the South were the slavers. While this is generally accurate there was a bit more nuance in it. The issue of Missouri came around when it applied for statehood. The number of free and slave states was equal, and this threatened that fragile balance.

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

In America during the early and mid 1800’s, many compromises were made about slavery in attempts to calm relations between Northern and Southern states. However, the effects of many of those compromises revealed their true nature of simply leaning on one side of the issue or the other. One such instance of this was the Missouri Compromise of 1820 in which Missouri was allowed to be a slave state only with the admittance of Maine as a free state as well as permanently prohibiting slavery in the remaining Luisiana Purchase north of the 36°30' parallel. Another such contract was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which recognized Kansas and Nebraska as official United States territories and allowed both to decide by popular sovereignty whether

Read More
1458 Words | 6 Pages

In the years on up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups across the country. The horrible compromise that sacrificed the rights of African Americans in favor of a more stronger union in the states exploded once more in 1819 when Missouri requested to join the United States as a slave state. In 1819, the nation had eleven free and eleven slave states creating a balance in the U.S. senate. Missouri's entrance threatened to throw this parity in favor of slave’s strong feelings toward it. The debate in Congress over the admission of Missouri was unusally and extraordinary bitter after Congressman James Tallmadge from New York put forward an idea that slavery be banned in the new state.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

As westward expansion continued, the number of free states would be twice that of the already existing, and only, slave states. The Missouri compromise showed the different opinions that the regions, mainly the north and south, had about slavery. In the north they

Read More
1098 Words | 5 Pages

Although the Union’s aim in entering the Civil War was to hold the nation together, the Southern States originally seceded largely because of rising tensions about slavery caused by several key events. Prior to the mid-1800s the government had been skirting around slavery issues and attempting to pacify both sides, but eventually irrepressible problems began to arise and tempers flared, leading to the Civil War in 1861. In the years following the Louisiana Purchase, westward expansion brought up a need to develop a policy concerning the regulation of slave and free territories. At the time, slave states and free states had equal representation, and the addition of a new state could disrupt the balance.

Read More
868 Words | 4 Pages

In the 1840 slavery would become a great debate among the United States due to territorial growth. The United States was gaining growth and many areas were not officially established as part of the United States yet. So settles were eager to start growth is these new lands, but the question would be if slavery would be allowed. The southern regions held their power from the political power they held. Their economy was based on slave based Plantation and the southerners feared that their economy would collapse without it.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The Southern states even threatened to secede because of the differences in opinion on slavery. To prevent this, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. Missouri joined the Union as a slave state, but in exchange, Maine was admitted as a free state. In addition, all states and lands north of the 36°30’ parallel would be free (except for Missouri). This ‘compromise’ somehow managed to hold America together, but no one was really satisfied.

Read More
1563 Words | 7 Pages

At the time, there was not a way to completely settle the issue, but there was a way to ease some of the dispute between the states. The Missouri compromise was made to alleviate some of the conflicts over slavery. Slavery all started in 1619 in America when African slaves were taken to Jamestown, Virginia (history.com 2017). Slavery was an acceptable practice throughout the country in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries (history.com 2009). African American slaves were taken from their homes and brought to America to be put in other peoples homes and do work (gilderlehrman.org 2009).

Read More

More about Essay On Missouri Compromise

Related Topics

Open Document