ipl-logo

Compare And Contrast The Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

1652 Words7 Pages

In America during the early and mid 1800’s, many compromises were made about slavery in attempts to calm relations between Northern and Southern states. However, the effects of many of those compromises revealed their true nature of simply leaning on one side of the issue or the other. One such instance of this was the Missouri Compromise of 1820 in which Missouri was allowed to be a slave state only with the admittance of Maine as a free state as well as permanently prohibiting slavery in the remaining Luisiana Purchase north of the 36°30' parallel. Another such contract was the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 which recognized Kansas and Nebraska as official United States territories and allowed both to decide by popular sovereignty whether …show more content…

The reality was that because of regional differences that formed between them no true solution existed. The North wanted to limit the spread of slavery and perhaps one day eliminate it while the South refused to accept anything that threatened the expansion of slavery or the institution itself. When the Republican Party rose to power and elected Abraham Lincoln as their candidate, he knew that this issue would tear America apart as evidenced by his speech, “A House Divided Could Not Stand” and his inaugural address. Lincoln had said, “One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute.” He personally believed that blacks had the rights granted to them by the constitution which included life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in which the South was clearly not in favor of by promoting slavery. In the North all of these events were viewed as part of the greater slave conspiracy in which they believed that the South only wanted to deny them their own constitutional rights by supporting slavery. The South interpreted the North’s reaction to this as proof that they were the ones seeking to rob them of their security and place within the Union. Eventually, the point of no return was reached on February of 1861 when seven of the slaveholding states seceded from the Union to form the Confederate States of America which passed its own constitution on March 11 of that same year. When this happened, war had become enviable and the fate of democracy would hang on the balance of this Civil

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Missouri Compromise Of 1820

124 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was a kind of an agreement between the two sides (the pro and the anti-slavery sections) with the purpose of regulating slavery in the western territories. Excluding Missouri, this settlement banned slavery in the new states of the Arkansas territory. The Missouri Compromise recognized that the Congress had no right to impose over states claiming admission to the union conditions that dit not call to those states already in the union and also established a precedent for the relegation of slavery from public territory obtained after the Constitution. After the admission of Missouri in 1821, there were no states admitted until 1836 when Arkansas became a slave state and followed by Michigan which became a free

Read More

Compare And Contrast Missouri Compromise And The Compromise Of 1850

401 Words | 2 Pages

The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 were attempts to bring the nation together but ended up pulling it apart. The Missouri Compromise's goal was to end the feud on the border for free and slave states, end the feud on Missouri becoming a free or slave state. The solution for the border was to have an imaginary line at 36 degrees, 30' minutes anything above the line, with an acception of Missouri, would be free and anything below the line would be slave. The solution to Missouri becoming free or slave was Maine would become a free state and Missouri would become a slave state to keep the number of slave states and the number of free states equal. In time the Missouri Compromise would tear the nation apart despite its intentions.

Read More

To What Extent Was The Kansas-Nebraska Act Of 1854

1383 Words | 6 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act was a bill that essentially disregarded and relinquished the Missouri Compromise. The Kansas-Nebraska Act stated that any westward expansion of the United States was to have the decision on slavery made via popular sovereignty. Popular sovereignty, in regards to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, was the idea that the decision on slavery in a region should be decided by the people who live there. This seemed fair, but the issue with instating popular sovereignty was that the parameters of the Missouri Compromise stated that slavery could not exist anywhere above the 36°30° line (History.com). Therefore, popular sovereignty would entirely disregard important factors of the Missouri Compromise, which was regarded by many as a strong force in holding the Union

Read More

Louisiana Purchase Dbq

102 Words | 1 Pages

In the era before the Civil War America was expanding westward. The Louisiana Purchase and other lands gained help to give America new land to expand on, but this leaded to issues with the division of free and slave states. As Missouri became a state they wanted to become a slave state, which caused trouble. In order to keep equilibrium between the states, Congress came up with the Missouri Compromise of 1820.The Missouri Compromise made Missouri a slave state and Maine a free state. The Treaty also made a line within the Louisiana Territory to keep slavery from moving up the

Read More

The Conflict Over Slavery: The Missouri Compromise

135 Words | 1 Pages

The conflict over slavery became more brutal as the United States expanded westward. It began to force Americans to either identify themselves as anti-slavery or pro-slavery. The discovery of new states led to the conflict on whether they should be admitted as free states or slaves states. Compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise of 1820 were attempted to settle the conflict of free states or slave states. The Missouri Compromise declared that all new states above the line would be establish as free states, and all states below the line would be establish as slave states.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The War Between 1800 And 1860

837 Words | 4 Pages

Various conditions, following back to political issues and differences that started in no time when the upset, eventually semiconductor diode the U.S. into war. Between the years 1800 and 1860, contentions between the North and South developed extra extraordinary, subjection being the focal issue of the contentions, however not the sole one. Another motivation behind real rivalry amongst North and South concerned charges paid on stock brought into this nation from remote nations. This assessment was known as a tax. Southerners felt these levies were unreasonable and pointed principally toward them subsequently of them remote a more extensive type of stock than generally Northerners.

Read More

The Missouri Compromise Of 1850: A Comparative Analysis

640 Words | 3 Pages

Due to the threat of unequal representation in the Senate, Missouri’s entrance to the Union as a possible slave state caused a separation between the North and South. Prior to the concern of slavery in Missouri, the Union had maintained an equal balance of free and slave states in the Senate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was the agreement, which allowed Maine to enter the Union as a free state in addition to Missouri’s entrance as a slave state to recreate the

Read More

How The Missouri Compromise And The Fugitive Slave Act Of 1850

1174 Words | 5 Pages

The North, which were anti-slavery, argued that Congress had the power to prohibit slavery in the new state. Meanwhile, the South,which were pro-slavery, believed that states, rather than the government, should have the right to decide whether they wanted slavery or not therefore they argued that the State of Missouri had the right to decide whether they wanted to be a slave state or not and that it should not be up to the Congress to decide. In an effort to preserve the balance of power in Congress between slave and free states, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise which allowed Missouri to be a slave state and allowed Maine into the Union as a free state to resolve crisis, which a member of Congress, Henry Clay, offered. The history surrounding the nineteenth century led to the establishment of the Missouri

Read More

Compromise Of 1850 Dbq Essay

1309 Words | 6 Pages

Before the passing of the Compromise of 1850, Congress needed to keep the power balanced between slave states and non-slave states in the government. To keep the balance, they passed the Missouri Compromise in 1820. This Compromise allowed Missouri into the union as a slave state and allowed Maine into the union as a non-slave state. As a result, the balance between slave states and non-slave states stayed equal. This resulted in neither the North nor the South having an advantage in passing laws.

Read More

Owen Brown Research Paper

686 Words | 3 Pages

The outcome of the Missouri Compromise was that “Missouri would be admitted to the Union as a slave state and Maine would be admitted as a free state, maintaining the balance between slave and free states and slavery would be outlawed in any U.S. territories north of latitude 36’30”. (15) After the Missouri Compromise, the Anti-Slavery Society was formed. The Anti-Slavery Society was formed in 1830 in order to end slavery after the death of a slave by the name of Nat Turner. The Compromise of 1850 was similar to the Compromise of 1820. The Compromise of 1850 occurred after the Mexican War when it came to decide whether these states should be considered free states or slave states.

Read More

How Did The Compromise Of 1850 Play In The Start Of The Civil War

962 Words | 4 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, narrowly passed while Congressmen brandished weapons and uttered death threats in the House chambers, overturned parts of the Missouri Compromise by allowing the settlers in the two territories to determine whether or not to permit slavery by a popular vote. Pro- and anti-slavery agitators flocked to Kansas, hoping to shift the decision by sheer weight of numbers. “The two factions struggled for five years with sporadic outbreaks of bloodshed that claimed fifty-six lives.” Although both territories eventually ratified anti-slavery constitutions, the violence shocked and troubled the nation.

Read More

Who Is Andrew Jackson Dbq

805 Words | 4 Pages

The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed each territory to decide the issue of slavery on the basis of popular sovereignty. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri Compromise, which had kept the Union from falling apart for the last thirty-four years. The Kansas-Nebraska let to Bleeding Kansas. Monroe Doctrine 1823 which created separate spheres of European and American influence.

Read More

The Inevitable: The Missouri Compromise Of 1850

718 Words | 3 Pages

In the early 18th century, sectionalism ran rampant throughout the entirety of the United States. The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into free and slave territory along the 36’ 30’ line, and admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state to keep the balance in Congress. It was supposed to cure the civil division amongst the North and the South. However, the problems only seemed to continue. The Missouri Compromise was like putting a bandaid on an amputated leg.

Read More

Missouri Compromise Of 1850

597 Words | 3 Pages

The issue of slavery expansion in the West emerged significantly with Missouri’s intention of entering into the union as a slave state, thus enabling the constitution of the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Through Missouri’s aspirations the stabilization of power between the free states and slave states in the senate was undone. To revitalize the equilibrium, a consensus was reached where Missouri would enter as a slave state, with Maine entering a free state to sustain the balance. In subsequent years as the United States gained new territories though the Mexican-American War the slavery expansions disputes reemerged in the senate. California sought admission into the union as a free state, and the equal balance of slave states and free states was,

Read More

Seminole War Dbq

740 Words | 3 Pages

The country was divided self-consciously with different priorities. The dispute of slavery came to the forefront in American politics, primarily in the South because of their asset in large scale agriculture. The issue came to head when the debate whether the Missouri Territory was going to be entered as a free a state. The result was the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which allowed Missouri to enter as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Calhoun boldly stated his view from the Senate floor in 1837 that the race-based slavery that was prominent in the South was “instead of an evil, a good- positive good.”

Read More

More about Compare And Contrast The Compromises Between 1820 And 1860

Open Document