ipl-logo

The Inevitable: The Missouri Compromise Of 1850

718 Words3 Pages

In the early 18th century, sectionalism ran rampant throughout the entirety of the United States. The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into free and slave territory along the 36’ 30’ line, and admitted Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state to keep the balance in Congress. It was supposed to cure the civil division amongst the North and the South. However, the problems only seemed to continue. The Missouri Compromise was like putting a bandaid on an amputated leg. Therefore, because of the conflicts in the expansion of slavery, the opposing economic structures of the North and South, and The Compromise of 1850, in period of 1840 to 1861, the statement, “The Civil War was not inevitable; it was the result of extremism and …show more content…

Slavery was bound to create conflict. The North believed that slavery was corrupt. A book written by Harriet Beecher Stowe, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, described the cruelty that was slavery. The author’s purpose was to show its readers, the Northern free states, how truly corrupt and hypocritical the Southern slave owners were. She shows this by using the Bible, saying that only God can buy a soul, that the slave owner holds no true hold over the slave, however the slave owner disagrees. This was only one of the reasons that the North became riddled with extreme abolitionist movement. This caused the Southerners to be angry with the North. The quote, “I cannot but see what mischiefs their interference with the South has produced…” (Document 1) shows the animosity that was growing between the two. However, most Northerners didn’t want to entirely abolish slavery, simply restrict it to the South and ban it in the new territories. They believed the practice would die with time. However, this caused fear in the South. If the number of free states outnumbered those that supported slavery, they could abolish slavery and ruin the South. The Missouri Compromise was thought to have fixed the issue, declaring that slavery could not …show more content…

The main source of revenue for the South was agriculture, namely cotton. Cotton was King, or so it was believed by the South. They were the main source of cotton in the world at that point. They also provided other goods Because the agricultural industry needed a large workforce to be successful, slaves were introduced to accomplish the tasks. The South created raw materials that were then used by the North. The North had an industrialized economy. They were the factory workers and the merchants. Because of the conflicting views on how money was to be made, the North and the South could not get along. When a protective tariff was placed on imported goods, the South’s economy was threatened, while the North’s economy was protected. The South felt as though the North was out to destroy them. When Abraham Lincoln was elected president, the threat of abolishing slavery arose. The entire livelihood of the Southern economy was endangered. Because of the North and South were so divided, so divergent in their ideals and their morals, they were unable to negotiate and understand what was truly best for the

Show More
Related
105 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri Compromise Unravels was a debate between slavery which congress had no power over to control. They eventually settle on an antislavery pension called the GAG rule to keep any slavery topics off the table. It 's important because Northerners wanted to keep slavery out of the growing nation and Southerners wanted to keep their property and get more money from their slaves. They fought for the new land and what to do with it and causing congress to deadlock California and there appeal for statehood. The South was not happy about California becoming a free state and eventually think about withdrawing from the

Read More
154 Words | 1 Pages

Last month, we learned the Missouri Compromise, the Monroe Doctrine and American System. These three events were important for me to review against, I deem. The Missouri Compromise was worked out in 1820. The Congress had a serious problem about balance. Missouri became one thing that could break this balance.

Read More
198 Words | 1 Pages

Class, The Missouri Compromise did not effectively deal with the sectional conflict over slavery. This is because the compromise did not result in a definite solution that left both sides pleased but instead left neither side content (Kennedy 235). If the sectional conflict was resolved, this could have helped to prevent the secession of the southern states in the American Civil War, or this could have caused the American Civil War to start sooner rather than later. I believe that the North got the better side of the deal. At this time, the North and the South were worried about political and economic balances, and it seems like this compromise gave the North an advantage (Kennedy 234).

Read More
379 Words | 2 Pages

Before the Civil War, Americans tried to resolve their differences between free states and slave states by enacting compromises. The Missouri Compromise and the three-fifths compromise were temporary solutions used to keep the south happy in hopes that they wouldn’t secede. These compromises failed because neither the free states, nor the slave states where happy with the compromise. The failure of these compromises were what led to a war between the north and South.

Read More
605 Words | 3 Pages

“But this momentous question, like a fireball in The night, awakened and filled me with terror. I considered it at once as the knell of the Union” (Jefferson). This is from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson to Thomas Holmes in 1820 talking about the issue of slavery and the Missouri Compromise, and Thomas Jefferson was afraid that the Congress may keep on compromising to satiate the south’s want for slavery. The people in the north and the south kept I arguing till the Civil War, whether slavery should be continued or if they should get rid of this abominable institution, but Henry Clay did not want there to be a civil war so he helped write a compromise to keep the peace between the feuding halves of America dreaming that peace would be achieved. Even though many people in the south of America through the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be beneficial, it ultimately failed, and it only postponed

Read More
248 Words | 1 Pages

The Missouri compromise was a bill introduced to stop the fighting between the states about slavery. Each state before the Missouri compromise was determining wither the states were a free or slave state but when the Missouri compromise was proposed it stated that every state above the 36 degree and 30 degree line were to be free. This officially separated the North from the South. The Missouri compromise along with other problems about slavery is resolved when the civil war comes around. The Missouri compromise and the Mexican American war are similar because America kept wanting to expand and the Mexican American war helped America do that.

Read More
575 Words | 3 Pages

Compromise has played a long role in the history of the United States. One of the compromises was the Missouri Compromise which caused one of America's most famous and heated political conflicts. This essay will discuss the crisis that developed around the admission of Missouri as a state and how this crisis was resolved. Since the Revolution, the country had grown from 13 states

Read More
2521 Words | 11 Pages

Event Issues Events Outcomes Relation to CW Missouri Compromise of 1820 Tensions between proslavery and antislavery began to rise within the US Congress. Also the balance of power in the Congress was trying to be achieved as well. Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state in 1819. In result of this request, they made a two-part compromise allowing Missouri to be a slave state, but in order to balance the states out, they made Maine a free state.

Read More
1249 Words | 5 Pages

Due to the poor and unstable industries within the South, the Confederacy was not able to support and supply their army. The South had little to no food to supply their soldiers, due to the lack of farms. They were mainly focused on the cotton fields because the soil was damaged and all that could grow was cotton and cotton was the number one source of profit for them (Boyer 487). Besides cotton the South also made most of their money from the value slaves. Due to the war the South’s economy was fully destroyed, the output in the South decreased by 39% (Boyer 454).

Read More
1652 Words | 7 Pages

The reality was that because of regional differences that formed between them no true solution existed. The North wanted to limit the spread of slavery and perhaps one day eliminate it while the South refused to accept anything that threatened the expansion of slavery or the institution itself. When the Republican Party rose to power and elected Abraham Lincoln as their candidate, he knew that this issue would tear America apart as evidenced by his speech, “A House Divided Could Not Stand” and his inaugural address. Lincoln had said, “One section of our country believes slavery is right, and ought to be extended, while the other believes it is wrong, and ought not to be extended. This is the only substantial dispute.”

Read More
1180 Words | 5 Pages

The issue was settled in 1820 with the Missouri Compromise which prohibited slavery north of the 36°30’ border of the Arkansas territory. The compromise set the precedent that for every new slave state accepted into the Union, a new free state must be established as well. Furthermore, the compromise was a clear recognition that Congress had no right to impose upon a state asking for admission into the Union conditions which do not apply to those states already in the Union. Yet, this only delayed the inevitable and served as a “quick-fix” solution. Thomas Jefferson, himself, wrote in a letter to John Holmes that the division of the country created by the Compromise line would eventually lead to the destruction of the Union.

Read More
1121 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Missouri Compromise caused some problems. The compromise equaled the concerns and interests in the North and South, but the South was upset about how Congress gave itself the power to create and pass laws dealing with slavery. Much of the North was upset because Congress let slavery spread into another state. There were people who didn’t want to compromise, and others who did, such as Henry Clay.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

The compromises of the previous decade could of have postponed the civil war and accelerate the civil war. The civil war was inevitable because of Missouri Compromise of 1820, Compromise of 1850, Fugitive Slave law, and Dred Scott Decision. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was about all states that are north of 36 degrees north latitude were to be free except Missouri. All states below the line would become a slave state so far there were some problems.

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Missouri wanted to enter the nation as a slave state which would cause a problem, the North was concerned by the unbalance that it would cause within the Senate. So congressman James Tallmadge "proposed a ban on the importation of slaves into Missouri and the slow freedom of its black residents". As a way to make the North happy, the House of Representatives passed the bill that granted Maine as a free state. In addition, as part of the compromise, slavery would be not allowed slavery in the north of the 36°30 ' parallel line. The issue over the Missouri Compromise caused controversy within Congress.

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

This created problems because the South saw the Missouri Compromise as a threat towards slavery. The disagreements got so bad that it began to divide the United States between the North and South. The Southerners began to start arguments to keep and defend slavery. The defenders, also known as the southerners believed if you ended slavery that it would have

Read More

More about The Inevitable: The Missouri Compromise Of 1850

Open Document