Social stratification and inequality is a widespread issue that society faces, however there are differing opinions and solutions in that regard. The issue is essentially whether inequality is beneficial or detrimental to society, and what the acceptable extent is that inequality can take. Society has been based upon a social ladder for quite some time, and an individual’s placement on it will likely determine the outcome of their life. It can be said that inequality is based upon three main aspects: class, race, and gender. However, class is the topic of discussion in this case. Economic status ends up enabling or stopping individuals from participating in certain aspects of life, such as education, sports, healthcare, etc. Since society …show more content…
In “Functions of Inequality”, Davis and Moore attempt to explain the necessity of inequality in order to have a stable, functioning society. The premise is that inequality motivates individuals to push for success and advancement. Without motivation, then there would be no competition; no drive for improvement. If no one strives for success, then everything will operate on a subpar level. There are also incentives to benefit those who work harder so they will continue to better themselves. However, the positions that allow rewards and mobility go to those who are the most qualified. That is to say that the more functionally important positions go to those who are talented enough to fill them. But this is also to say that some jobs are more important than others in regards to society. Who, then, determines which positions are the most vital, and which are the least? Davis and Moore explain the differences in importance due to the fact that some positions require more skill and ability than others. This also causes there to be different prerequisites for different jobs which automatically creates inequality. And because of these prerequisites, there will be less workers or occupants for that position. Therefore, not only is inequality necessary, but it is imminent in any society. The six main points that Davis and Moore (1945) make are as