More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay explaining why lizzie borden is guilty
Why lizzie borden is guilty essay
An essay explaining why lizzie borden is guilty
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay explaining why lizzie borden is guilty
The following evidence is what proves Lizzie is not guilty. First, all cases like this must include evidence to find the killer, but none was found against LIzzie to make her guilty. According to Source #1 , “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders. A hatchet had been discovered in
Lizzie Borden is guilty of murdering Andrew Borden and Abby Borden on August 4, 1892, in Fall River, Massachusetts. I can prove this because in the article “Could the Journals of Lizzie Borden’s Lawyer Reveal the Truth.” by Daily Mail Reporter it says that “Andrew had also upset Lizzie for chopping off the heads of pigeons she fed and watered. Lizzie had also fallen out with her stepmother and called her 'Mrs.Borden’”(Daily Mail Reporter). This shows that Lizzie was very upset at both her father and Abby which means she would have a perfect motive for wanting them gone.
“August 4, 1892, Andrew and Abby Borden are murdered in their home in Fall River, Massachusetts.” Chery Eddy Lizzie Borden is arrested for the murder of her father and stepmother. ... Lizzie Borden was found not guilty But I think that she was. The first reason, I think lizzie borden was the murderer because of the suspicious behavior before and after the murder. A clean, handle-free hatchet blade was found in the basement, which was the only reason it was suggested murder weapon.
I believe that Lizzie Borden did kill Both Abby and Andrew Borden on the day of August 4, 1892. Some people think that Lizzie is guilty some think she is innocent. My reasons for believing this are she wanted more attention from her father. My second reason is when she testified about what happened and her whereabouts it didn't add up. My third and final reason to believe that Lizzie is guilty is she had reasons to think that her father was going to get hurt shortly before her father got killed.
It seems unusual that a woman would choose to wait alone in a house if she thought a murderer still might be in the neighborhood on the loose. Furthermore, On the night before the murders, Lizzie went to visit Alice Russell ( a neighbor), and told her that she was worried that some unknown enemy of her father's might try to kill him soon. As a result, this convinced me to believe that Lizzie Borden was the only possible culprit for the murders of her
Also from CBS News, they provide pictures of the skulls of Andrew and Abby Borden. The pictures of the skulls show large pieces of both skulls missing from the skulls, CBS News reports. This evidence shows that someone had very, very harsh thoughts and a person like Lizzie is not that person. To continue, the Borden family’s maid, Bridget Sullivan, has the capability to actually commit a murder like this. In Article #5 it says, “Bridget said that she had worked for the Bordens for two years and ten months doing general housework.”
In August 1892, one of the most disastrous murderers occurred that is still yet to be solved. Andrew Jackson Borden and Abby Durfee Borden were a married couple in the 19th century. They were suddenly murdered with an ax and were given multiple whacks to the head. Lizzie Borden, daughter of the two victims, still remains as the only suspect that committed the murderers. For this reason, Lizzie Borden is guilty.
Her story was “She wandered to the barn and searched the second story of the building for leads for a sinker for Monday’s possible fishing excursion. She also ate some pears in the barn, remaining there for a span of fifteen or twenty minutes.” (Mock). Of all the suspects, there was one that was never cleared. And that was Lizzie, although it is assumed to be her, she still had a shot at being declared innocent.
Other family members could be guilty of the crime, not just Lizzie. The first possible suspect that comes to mind is John Morse, Lizzie’s uncle who, after supposedly being made aware of the horrible murders, is said to have “ambled” into the back yard and proceeded to “eat pears in the shade” (King 27). The next possible suspect would have to be Emma, who, being out of town that day was sent a telegram telling her about the murders, but she “did not catch the next train,” or the next, in fact she did not “return” home “until after seven that night” (King 27). Doesn't that seem a little odd, seeing as her father was just killed; unless she had something to do with it and couldn’t get home until then, but we will never know. Another possible suspect is Bridget Sullivan, the maid who happened to be in and around the house at the time of the murders (“The Lizzie Borden Story”).
The only one in the house at the time was Lizzie Borden. Also, they found no evidence that someone came in and just murdered mr. and mrs. Borden. Another reason why I think she committed the murder was because she was having conflict with her mother All in all, Lizzie had to have been guilty because she had the most evidence out of everybody else that was considered a suspect.
I read through all the witness testimonies and Lizzie Borden is guilty let me tell you why. All these testimonies mentioned something that made her look guilty. here’s why, she changed the story way too much, Lizzie Borden burned a really big piece of evidence, she also could have been jealous of her stepmother because her father bought her stepmother Abby Borden a house. Lizzie Borden seems to change her answers a lot in the very last document. Let me explain to you why she is guilty.
In Fall River a girl that goes by Lizzie Borden killed her parents out of anger and rage. This was a planned murder due to family friction and the relationship in the family. It seems apparent that Lizzie Borden killed her parents due to a bad relationship and friction between the three. Lizzie Borden killed her parents over a fit of range and an insecure mindset to be thinking. For example, she had a bad home life and relationship with her family members.
She had been taken into questioning on June 1893. An all-male jury deliberated and returned saying that she was not guilty but can we really trust an all-male jury group? They obviously would not say she guilty because she was a women and they wouldn’t do something to her to make her go to jail. In my opinion, I strongly believe that Lizzie Borden is guilty of killing both her parents because she attempted to buy prussic acid, she burned a dress that supposedly had paint on it, and the ‘nursery rhyme” even states what could have actually happened during the times of the murders. Lizzie had much reasons to be blamed for this.
In Lizzie Borden: Murderess or Media Sensation it states that “There was no physical evidence linking her to the murders” There was no evidence that she did the murders. They didn't question anybody but Lizzie. Anyone could have done it. This just proves that Lizzie did not do
The Crucible, written by Arthur Miller, suggests that often the primary response to one's own fault is to blame another individual. In the playwright, a young girl, Abigail Williams, is found to be dancing and conjuring spirits with her friends in the woods, going against the town’s religious beliefs. Immediately after getting exposed, Abigail attempts to put the blame on their servant Tituba, whom she knows cannot dispute the claim. Her insolence and lies cause an undesirable chain reaction that puts the town into a state of chaos and terror. Eventually, she is forced to flee town or risk considerable punishment for the havoc she caused by her deception and fabrication.
