Essay On Thomas Paine Arguments For Freedom

787 Words4 Pages

Common Sense Examined: Arguments for Freedom The War for American Independence began in the year of 1775, but it peaked in the year of 1776. The colonies were displeased with the constant taxation from the English government. The 13 colonies were being taxed excessively and did not have representation by the British monarch. The reality is that it was in the best economic interest for the colonies to separate from the English government. The goal was to establish the colonies as a republic rather than a dependent of Great Britain. This is exactly Thomas Paine’s aim in the document in Common Sense. Thomas Paine used eloquent and forceful words to slay apart the English government. His goal was to show that it was only logical and reasonable …show more content…

“He envisions America as…independent…” (Csábi, 2001 pp. 5). He pointed out the harm caused in being connected to the monarch of Britain for so long. He stated that there was no need for Britain reign the colonies could support themselves. The colonies were no longer benefiting from the connection. It was just a formality to make the separation official because the colonies were already disconnected in spirit, except for a few loyalists. Paine makes a clear and concise statements as to why there was a need for liberty. Absolute power given to one empire cannot be fair in its judgments, the colonies could stand on their own destruction can only come if the colonies did not sever her connection from …show more content…

Investigations took place and lead to the discovery of a contradicting English constitution. “Thirst…for absolute power is the natural disease of monarchy” (Paine 1776, pp. 9). Ultimately, the English King was in power and supported out of loyalty and prejudice favor not purpose. They serve a King and grant him power with no questions. The supports of the English government do so blindly or out of fear. The English constitution was vague and unclear how it benefited the common folk in countries outside of England, but it is clear and plain as day that the king held maximum