Ethical Concern: The Case Of Kant And Phibro

370 Words2 Pages
4. As ethical concern, the Heritage must have told Phibro about typo. In this case, there is no evidence that they had agree whether $00.1 or $0.1 provision, but if there were evidence, Heritage would lose. In addition, Kant argues about Kant's categorical imperative, "An act is only ethical if it would be acceptable for everyone to do the same thing." (Samuelson, 29) If the positions were oposite and Phibro hadn't told Heritage about typo, Heritage would have claimed it too. Also, $ 0.1 provision wouldn't provide the most benefit to both Heritage and Phibro. Only Heritage would get benefits from $ 0.1 provision. Rawl suggests that, society should reward behavior that provides the most benefit to the community as a whole." (Samuelson, 30) Therefore,