ipl-logo

Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Judgment

935 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Kant's theory of judgment

In general aesthetics is defined as concept that is dualistic - it involves on the one hand the artist and on the other hand the art critic or the philosopher. Aesthetics is a branch of philosophy and as such is interested in art itself and not in specific works of art. Modern aesthetics became distinct in the middle of the eighteenth century, and it was then also when claims that were trying to privilege aesthetic reason or experience arose. Such statements of aesthetic reason are present in Kant’s Critique of Judgement published in 1790. Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was born in Prussia and is amongst the most influential philosophers in the history of Western philosophy; he is also often pointed out to be the greatest philosopher after the Greeks. Because of this the philosophical movements that followed him have all been influenced by his contributions to metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, and aesthetics. The Critique of Judgment was the third and last …show more content…

Even though it appears that we are using reason to decide what is beautiful, the judgment is not a cognitive judgment, "and is consequently not logical, but aesthetical". The judgement of taste is subjective, in fact it refers to the response of the subject, which is emotional and depends only on the esteem for the object itself - it is a disinterested pleasure, and we feel that pure judgements of taste, i.e. judgements of beauty, lay claim to universal validity. It is important to underline that this universal validity does not stem from a determinate concept of beauty but from common sense. Kant also considers that a judgement of taste has the same characteristics a moral judgement has - they are disinterested, and we consider them to be

Show More
Related
1359 Words | 6 Pages

Evaluating artwork, I am discovering, is an art in itself. Properly applied appraisal includes objective as well as subjective criteria. Francis Schaeffer (1973) offers Four Standards of Judgement, “(1) technical excellence, (2) validity, (3) intellectual content, the world view which comes through and (4) the integration of content and vehicle” (p. 62). Additionally, great art may evoke intuitive and emotional responses. By all measures, the writings of C. S. Lewis are masterpieces of literature.

Read More
1157 Words | 5 Pages

Art is a true account of the activity of mind. Because consciousness is always consciousness of something, art thinks ever of the world, cannot not think of the world, could not turn its back on the world even if it wished to. This does not mean that it’s going to be honest as a mailman; it’s more likely to appear as a drag queen. The problems I mentioned earlier, as well as others not taken up, enforce complexity. Style enables us to speak, to imagine again.

Read More
870 Words | 4 Pages

I accompanied Nick to the District Court this week. He was prosecuting a man charged with several counts of unlawful sexual intercourse, gross indecency, and aggravated indecent assault. The complainant was between six and sixteen years during the period that these offences allegedly occurred, and she is now twenty-seven. The accused is in his mid-thirties. I was present for the majority of the complainant’s evidence in chief, and part of the cross-examination by a barrister that I will call B.

Read More
369 Words | 2 Pages

In 1947 a Norwegian explorer and writer Thor Heyerdahl with his crew went into a journey across the Pacific Ocean using the Kon-Tiki, which is a raft made of materials and technologies available to those people at that time with modern equipment. Heyerdahl wanted to prove that they are able to make that long journey by the raft itself even without the modern equipment they were having in it such as a radio, in order to prove his theory that the South Sea Islands were originally colonized by South Americans. Heyerdahl and a small team went to Peru, and made the Kon-Tiki from native materials in a native style by Spanish conquistadores. The main body was made of balsa tree lashed together with hemp ropes. The bow was made of Pine splashboards.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

we neglect our own perfection. While there are additional duties that make us better moral persons, it is difficult to analyze them under C1 or C2 because of the uniqueness of these duties which focus on improving our capacity to act dutifully. Given that there are no duties to self derivable from C1 alone in the Doctrines of Virtues, when we turn to a discussion of duties to others we face even more complications. All the duties of love (and likewise benevolence) are loosely derived from C1. While we might consider other’ ends, we may not give practical assistance to others, such as neighbor who is in bad circumstance.

Read More
966 Words | 4 Pages

In The Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785), the great Western thinker Immanuel Kant outlines some of his thoughts on some of the most fundamental of moral concepts, laying the groundwork for many future philosophers and students of ethics. Kant's ideas are, however, fairly challenging, both to modern-day readers of his works and to the thinkers of Kant's time that relied on contemporary utilitarian and hedonistic theories, or on objective good lists. Kant refutes these theories by promoting the examiniation of the act, rather than the consequences of the act, or the intentions behind it. Kant's sterile rejection of consequential pleasure, pain, or any motivation to do good in determining the moral worth of an act is controversial.

Read More
57 Words | 1 Pages

As I understand, aesthetic experiences, including the certain judgments, have subjective universal validity. Kant believes that those who could absorb Starry Night, or some other object would experience a similar pleasure. Aesthetic experience is key. Not everyone would find an object beautiful, but because all viewers undergo some sort of aesthetic experience they would be experiencing pleasure.

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The feeling of pleasure when evaluating a piece of art is when the person who is evaluating finds intentional content in beauty. People often make judgements based off of they 're own virtues and values, therefore subjectively perceiving in favor of the work. Kant points out that there is a surface and deep account of pleasure in beauty, deep relating to the use of the imagination and understanding of a work of art. Kant also points out that a person can be intrigued by a sense of

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

In his documentary film “why beauty matters” English philosopher Roger Scruton introduces the idea of beauty is disappearing from our world. The philosopher implies, that Art has become ugly, as well as our physical surroundings, manners, language, and music. Nowadays, the main aim of art is to disturb and break moral taboos. It has now lost its initial duty and is used to show solely the ugliness of our world, instead of taking what is most painful in the human condition and redeeming it in the work of beauty. What according to Scruton is the main purpose of art.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

He synthesized early modern rationalism and empiricism, set the terms for much of nineteenth and twentieth century philosophy, and continues to exercise a significant influence today in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics, and other fields. The fundamental idea of Kant 's “critical philosophy” — especially in his three Critiques: the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), and the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) — is human autonomy. He argues that the human understanding is the source of the general laws of nature that structure all our experience; and that human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality. Therefore, scientific knowledge, morality, and religious belief are mutually consistent and secure because they all rest on the same foundation of human autonomy, which is also the final end of nature according to the teleological worldview of reflecting judgment that Kant introduces to unify the theoretical and practical parts of his philosophical

Read More
1519 Words | 7 Pages

As a point of departure, to trace the gap between the aesthetics of ‘fine art’ and ‘popular visual culture’, I look briefly at the aesthetic criteria that signified modern art, and

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

There are many questions evolving around epistemology. The more common questions ask: do we have any knowledge? If so, how? To this day there is no exact and certain answer. Everyone must have questioned at least once in their lives, that how has knowledge come to be?

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Immanuel Kant’s moral theory differs greatly from the other theories we have learned about, especially Mill’s view of utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is based on the consequences of actions, while Kantian Ethics focuses on the intentions a person has before they act, and if they are fulfilling their duty as a person when acting. Kant explains his theory by providing examples of different people who are all doing the same action, but for different reasons. He discusses a store owner who charges everyone equal prices and explains that this only has moral worth if he is acting from duty, meaning he does this because it is what is right. The act is not moral if he acts in accordance with duty, or because he is worried about his reputation or business.

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

The German philosopher Immanuel Kant is considered to be a central figure of contemporary philosophy. Kant argued that fundamental concepts, structure human experience and that reason is the foundation of morality. In Kant’s 1784 essay “What is Enlightenment” he briefly outlined his opinions on what Enlightenment is, the difficulties to enlightenment and how individuals attain enlightenment. Kant defined enlightenment as “Man’s release from his self-incurred tutelage” (Kant 1) and the “Courage to use his own reason.

Read More
1994 Words | 8 Pages

It provides a condensed history of the evolution of critical theories and discriminates between them with the aid of a simple diagram. The essay begins with the definition of modern criticism which is to exhibit “the relation of art to the artist, rather than to external nature, or to the audience, or to the internal requirements of the work itself”. This one and a half century old theory of art competed against innumerable theories such as the mimetic theory, the pragmatic theory, etc., all of which have been thoroughly discussed in the essay. Abrams quotes theorists such as Santayana and D.W. Prall to show the unreal and chaotic nature of these alternate theories.

Read More

More about Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Judgment

Related Topics

Open Document