ipl-logo

Ethical Dilemmas In Homeland Security

1584 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: What are the roles of the department of homeland security

In recent years’ homeland security has taken a more political approach. Since the attacks on September 11, 2001, politics have played a large role in the decision making, excluding some checks and balances for immediate action. The role homeland security plays within federalism would be to find ways to secure our national security without infringing on our civil liberties. I believe that federalism and the policies and processes in place today, hold the highest importance of continuing our country’s ability to uphold the moral and ethical grounds of the world. Sacrificing those moral and ethical means could hold more threats than terrorism itself. Actions that are deemed unethical or immoral, could devastate foreign policy, or trust of one’s …show more content…

I believe that the major mistrust came at the hands of the war on Iraq. The major face of the Iraq War was to find weapons of mass destruction (WMD’s). It had not been seen by the United States public that Iraq had even had any WMD’s at the time, or were producing this type of weaponry. With a trickle-down effect, the building distrust of the federal government led to the American people not trusting local authorities and police. As an enormous issue in today’s society, it could boil down to the continually growing blatant distrust of the federal government. The distrust of local authorities has led to murders of local and state police officers. In a study from the Pew Research Center, as of 2015, “Only 19 percent of Americans today say they can trust the government in Washington to do what is right “Just about always” 3 Percent or “most of the time” 16 percent” (Fingerhut, 2015). When people distrust they seem to lose faith, and when people lose faith in their government, people tend to act out and not follow rules or laws. This has been shown most recently, while people protest in the streets against the government, and or local authorities. I believe that many issues in today’s society boil down to the distrust of our federal and local government and authorities. If people …show more content…

(2015, January 16). Federalism, Homeland Security and National Preparedness: A Case Study in the Development of Public Policy. Retrieved from https://www.hsaj.org/articles/163
CNN: Federal judge rules 2 Patriot Act provisions unconstitutional. (2007, September 26). Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/26/patriot.act/
Fingerhut, H. (2015, November 22). Beyond Distrust: How Americans View Their Government. Retrieved from hyyp://www.people-press.org/2015/11/23/1-trust-in-government-1958- 2015/
Heimlich, R. (2009, August 09). Eight Years After 9/11, Fewer See Need to Sacrifice Liberties for Safety. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2009/08/10/eight- years-after-911-fewer-see-need-to-sacrifice-liberties-for-safety/
Hoeflich, M. (2017, May 19). Homeland Security and Legal Ethics I & II. Retrieved from https://law.ku.edu/sites/law.ku.edu/files/docs/recent-developments/2017/hoeflich-I-II-

Show More
Related
801 Words | 4 Pages

I Just Wanna Be Average Mike Rose talked about his high school education and everything that went along with it. He starts off talking about how he was accidentally placed in vocational education due to a mix up of him and another student with the same last name. Although Rose was quite intelligent he was forced to sit in classes that were simplified and did not challenge him. Due to this fact he spent the first two years of high school paying more attention to the people around him than to his actual school work. He talks about each of his friends that shared the vocational classes with him and how they got into trouble and how they steered him in the wrong direction.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

a spawned complaints,” (Roberts, 2014, p. 355). From what that was saying is that civil defense was more successful while Homeland Security was a failure for the use federalism. For the contrast both Civil Defense and Homeland Security are used for safety to protect people from natural

Read More
1198 Words | 5 Pages

Prior to the Patriot act a search warrant was needed, after the Patriot Act a search warrant is no longer required for agents to employ surveillance “…when looking into the full range of terrorism-related crimes,” (Dept. of Justice). The Patriot Act allows federal officials to gather information for suspected terrorist activity without needing to have evidence. In addition to this, Howard Ball observed that in the seventh title of the Patriot Act information is able to be shared between federal, state, and local law enforcement (52). Banks and Tauber analyzed federal district court decisions on cases regarding the Patriot act and they found, “[T]hey [district courts] are not inclined to protect civil rights and liberties during times of domestic or international conflict.” They continue to note that judicial ideology does not affect the outcomes of these cases, that civil-libertarian interest groups make a deferential decision less likely, and that if a more conservative Senate and president are in power a deferential decision is more

Read More
102 Words | 1 Pages

Abraham Lincoln, a former US president, had stated, “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” Using the book, 102 Minutes by Jim Dwyer and Kevin Flynn, Lincoln’s observation can be proven to be accurate. This is because, in 102 Minutes, a common theme of self-destruction is revealed from the 1993 bombing as well as during 9/11. Self-destruction can be very dangerous when one realizes that when a country, or in this case, a state, diminishes their laws and regulations because, “it is unimportant” and “more cost efficient.”

Read More
393 Words | 2 Pages

Over the years following 9/11, facts about the secret surveillance program started to surface. As an investigation started being conducted, it was found that the program was not just listening in on calls and emails from abroad by quite of bit of activity monitoring was taking place within the United States causing a lot of controversy in the fact that people did not like the idea that their private information was being invaded by the NSA on authority of the president. Furthermore, there was a rise in concern for the Fourth Amendment rights against search and seizure violations of having individual’s emails taken and used against them without warrants. The Bush Administration worked with Congress immediately following the 9/11 attacks to pass and sign into law the USA Patriot Act that was “an overnight revision of the nation 's surveillance laws that vastly expanded the government 's authority to spy on its own citizens, while simultaneously reducing checks and balances on those powers like judicial oversight, public accountability, and the ability to challenge government searches in court” (ACLU,

Read More
1590 Words | 7 Pages

The United States spends more on its defense than any other country in the world, in a democratic state whose constitution Alexander Hamilton helped to inspire. It’s questionable as to what lengths a democratic system should go to keep its citizens safe as ultimately security cannot be unconditionally guaranteed. Having a debate between liberty and security is by no means a new one, its influence on political thought can be profoundly polarizing, as the extremes of both liberty and security can be witnessed around the world and throughout history. The principles that must be prioritized within a democracy while still affording safety, revolves around the ability of citizens to exercise their political liberties.

Read More
419 Words | 2 Pages

The USA Patriot Act was signed into law on Oct. 26, 2001, due to the need for cooperation among all levels of security. Police and other department agencies were given powerful authority and encouraged to share information. This is to meet the goal for a safer America in times of turmoil including international affairs. But as the years have passed and as terrorist attacks seem to cease, people have begun to question if there’s too many restrictions on law enforcement were called off.

Read More
183 Words | 1 Pages

Some people may think that the 14th amendment does a poor job of protecting people’s rights. In document five it explains how on September 11, 2001,with the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center, it has caused video surveillance in the United States to increase. For example the U.S has programs that use facial recognition that help match photographs of criminals faces to the criminal. Another program that we use helps prevent suicide bombers from attacking. Some people may think that prevention of terrible events reoccuring or occurring is a good thing, but using security systems everywhere may be a violation of their rights and privacy.

Read More
1406 Words | 6 Pages

In the Iroquois Confederacy, politics were run through a Council. Richard Blanchard notes that the Council was in charge of the external affairs of the Confederacy and matters that were common to all of the tribes, but could not regulate the internal affairs of each tribe (9). The political structure of the Iroquois is very similar to that of the US Congress, with a two-house legislature. The representatives from each tribe were called sachems, and though the sachems were men, powerful women in the tribe chose the men to represent their tribe (Blanchard 10). The sachems from the Oneida and the Cayuga tribes met in one house, and the sachems from the Seneca and Mohawk met in another.

Read More
1199 Words | 5 Pages

The author of, You decide: Current Debates in Criminal Justice asks, “Is the Patriot Act a Necessary Protection Against Terrorism or a Threat to Our Civil Liberties?” (Waller) Proponents of the Patriot Act have claim that the law is a necessary protection against terrorism. In contrast, opponents of the Patriot Act claim that it is a violation of Americans’ civil liberties. Both sides of the argument have debated valid points for and against the Patriot Act. The, U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act is an acronym that stands for, Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism.

Read More
836 Words | 4 Pages

Homeland security legal and ethical issues refer to the complex and nuanced challenges that arise when balancing the need to protect national security with the protection of individual rights and freedoms. These issues can include questions related to surveillance, privacy, civil liberties, and the use of military force, among others. They also include the ethical considerations that must be considered when making decisions about national security policies, such as the use of drones and targeted killings, the treatment of prisoners and detainees, and the handling of classified information. Addressing these legal and ethical issues requires a deep understanding of the law and the ability to navigate complex ethical dilemmas, as well as a commitment

Read More
999 Words | 4 Pages

This paper will discuss how to balance out civil liberties and security in intelligence activities; mainly surrounding the topic of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2002. With this topic and its perceived downfalls, identifying how to make both sides work efficiently will be discussed. Discussion When asked the question of “how can the United States balance civil liberties and security in intelligence activities?” the thought of the USA PATRIOT Act comes into mind; for two reasons. The first one is it caused a enormous uproar in the community after it was enacted based upon the fact it was perceived to infringe on civil liberties.

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

The question about the federal government that I address in this assignment is about the citizens’ rights that the Fifth Amendment to the United States’ Constitution contains, along with the Miranda rights. Based on what we discussed in Chapter 4, the Fifth Amendment includes the right that protects the American citizens from self-incrimination in the event of an accusation. In that regard, the right, together with the Miranda right that gives citizens the right to clamp up provides immunity for the involved citizen against police interrogation that could culminate in forced and unfair self-incrimination. Even so, the current system of law enforcement is such that police officers can ask the accused any question they want without informing

Read More
376 Words | 2 Pages

The personal liberties of Americans is what gives meaning to being an American. These liberties should be respected and upheld to the greatest efforts possible and should not be abridged by no means less than do process as exemplified by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the American Constitution. However, over time, we have learned about legislation that has been enacted by our government with said efforts to protect the nation. Hence, the Espionage and Sedition Acts, the confinement of Japanese-Americans during the Second World War, the Red Scare post-WWII, and the Pentagon Papers of 1971 are all examples that depict some of the behaviors performed by the federal government that would appear to infringe on these liberties.

Read More
1030 Words | 5 Pages

Civil liberties are rights guaranteed to citizens in the Constitution that the government cannot interfere with, however, in the name of national security, they do. The government sometimes finds it necessary for Americans to give up some of their basic rights to keep the nation protected, but many people find this unnecessary. A law-abiding citizen’s extremely personal information should not be essential to finding terroristic threats within this society. Under no circumstances should an American citizen’s civil liberties be violated in a time of war or crisis, because those are assured rights that are most valuable to their freedom during national conflicts.

Read More

More about Ethical Dilemmas In Homeland Security

Related Topics

Open Document