ipl-logo

Ethical Reasons To Censorship In The Toronto Symphony Orchestra

1558 Words7 Pages

Introduction: The problem presented in the case of the pianist, Valentina Lisitsa, performing in Toronto caused quite the disturbance regarding the “deeply offensive comments” (Pelly, 2015) posted of her opinions on the civil war in Ukraine. Due to these opinions being posted on the Internet, Lisitsa was not permitted to play at her scheduled performance in the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. Her replacement for the performance was supported by some and opposed by others. Those who supported her replacement took the stand of censorship against hate speech. Lisitsa was understandably upset that she was not able to perform and said that “the TSO [paid] her not to perform because she exercised her right to free speech” (Canadian Press, 2015). On …show more content…

Although everyone can exercise their right to free speech one must do so in a way not to offend others especially if done on an Internet platform. The topic of free speech and the censorship of the internet is a widely debated over matter. One issue of censoring the internet and what is said, is that it impedes on the right of freedom of speech and expression. There are ethical reasons to censor what is posted online however, each individual has the responsibility to use common sense when sharing an opinion that could potentially harm someone else.The decision that the Toronto Symphony Orchestra was presented with was whether or not to allow Lisitsa to perform. Agreeing to let her play would result in some people being upset that they had allowed someone who had very publicly offended them to perform. On the other hand, by not authorizing Lisitsa to be on stage the TSO would be invading on her right to freedom of speech and expression thus creating a big social issue. Based on either decision there will be many groups of people affected: those who were initially offended by Lisitsa’s comments, those who support freedom of speech and non-censorship, the Toronto Symphony Orchestra and Valentina …show more content…

In support of replacing Lisitsa, the harm theory states that we must not harm others and regarding her comments concerning the Ukrainian civil war, there were a number of people who felt her remarks to be offensive. Consequently, harm done reflects on Kant's categorical imperative which describes that there is a moral law that respects individuals and their dignity. However, Valentina’s dignity was stripped as her position in the TSO was terminated and replaced with ease. A second right, freedom of speech, is a right that every Canadian can utilize. Speaking out against the conflict in Ukraine was just Lisitsa exercising her right. Freedom of speech is “the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference subject to laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion” as defined by dictionary.com. (2018) According to this right, there should be freedom of speech without government interference, including no repercussions for Valentina Lisitsa expressing her

Show More
Related

James Keegstra Case Analysis

1148 Words | 5 Pages

The suppression of hate propaganda signifies an infringement of individual’s freedom of expression. An activity that conveys a message through non-violent forms of expression is protected under the s.2 of the Charter regardless of how offensive it is. Moreover, there was a misapplication of Charter, which made s.319 (2) of the Criminal Code to fail the proportionality test. There was no relation between the criminalization of hate speech and its suppression. Although his comments were offensive, they did not pose any threats they way violence or violence threats would have.

Read More

Summary Of Coddling Of The American Mind By Jonathan Haidt

1141 Words | 5 Pages

As the leader of the foundation, Greg Lukianoff has witnessed and fought many legal occasions of trigger warnings and microaggressions resulting in the masking of the freedom of speech. Coauthor Jonathan Haidt is a professor at New York University’s

Read More

The Theme Of Censorship In Ray Bradbury's Martian Chronicles

478 Words | 2 Pages

she is not happy that they are not allowed to express their thoughts and beliefs. “…if you have a differing opinion from the rest of society, your word in is danger of getting censored. The relationship between censorship and cultural values is also apparent …….. we really value young children’s innocence and this is obvious in our attempt to protect them using censorship” (Sarelly par.

Read More

What Role Did The Orthodox Church Play In The Russian Era

1339 Words | 6 Pages

The song only lasted less than a minute, but it caused a lot of controversy from religious authorities and government officials. They accused the group of blasphemy and disrespect toward their religious beliefs, and three members of Pussy Riot were arrested and charged with “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred”. This event started a debate about freedom of speech and the Church's influence in public life. Supporters of the group argued that the protest was a valid form of artistic expression, and protected by freedom of speech. Alternatively, others argued that the group’s actions were offensive and sinful, and accused them of disrespecting the belief system of millions of Russians and disregarding the authority of the Church.

Read More

Stanley Fish's The Harm In Free Speech

527 Words | 3 Pages

In the New York Times article “The Harm in Free Speech”, Stanley Fish argues that it would make no difference if Jeremy Waldron’s book, “The Harm in Hate Speech,” was titled “The Harm in Free Speech”. While providing an insightful review of the novel, Fish promotes the ideas depicted in the novel. Fish argues that American society is obsessed with using the First Amendment to say outwardly offensive statements. Fish asserts that “hate speech” is not simply expressing an opinion, but rather a way to belittle members of society a person deems unworthy. Americans hide behind the First Amendment and use it as a justification to spew hate speech.

Read More

Erwin Chemerinsky And Giimportance Of Free Speech In The United States

493 Words | 2 Pages

Free speech is crucial in helping a democratic society

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The First Amendment

1203 Words | 5 Pages

This case clashes with freedom of speech, but it is also about freedom to

Read More

Martin Luther King Jr.'s Sorrowful Letter From Birmingham Jail

1626 Words | 7 Pages

Throughout the ages, the pursuit of freedom has established our social, political, and legal environments, serving as the main force behind society’s development. In a democracy, the right to free speech, the press, and religion serve as foundations for open debate and as defenses against despotism. Not only have these liberties created the growth of civil rights, but they are also a necessity that enables people to voice their opinions and critically evaluate the acts of the government. The fundamental right to freedom of speech is recognized as one of the primary liberties for the operation of a free and open society. The value of free speech cannot be overstated since it guarantees that all opinions, no matter how well-liked or disliked,

Read More

Annotated Bibliography On Overcriminalizing Speech

1204 Words | 5 Pages

The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.

Read More

Establishment Clause Case Study

1182 Words | 5 Pages

Additionally this case examines the infringement of an individual's freedom of speech by

Read More

Canadian Charter Of Rights And Freedoms Under The Fundamental Freedom

936 Words | 4 Pages

Despite having the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom entrenched into the Constitution, it is not immune to the social correctness of speech formality. Universities, the place where students can further their education and to which speech should be free, yet it is hindered to speak your thoughts in such a public formality, to highly restrictive speech rules, “Suppressing them in academic discourse, however, means that these views cannot be exposed for what they are—lies, hatred, bias, misrepresentations—which is a far more effective means of neutralizing such materials and for giving the individuals holding such views reasons to change them.” The abstinence of free speech we have seem to know instinctively has weakened in society, which is an unsettling situation to handle, our expressions, values, and opinions to society may be rocky because not everyone values this fundamental expression of speech. This argument holds a fallacy and it makes an appeal to authority because it suggests that the academic authorities are pondering on to the sides of which this argument has between hate and free

Read More

The Indispensable Opposition Analysis

289 Words | 2 Pages

In fact, Lippmann claims this system of free speech allows us to

Read More

Romeo And Juliet Violations

792 Words | 4 Pages

In The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, one of the rights Juliet is denied is the freedom of expression. As defined in Article 19 of the Declaration of Human Rights, “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Polarization

990 Words | 4 Pages

Malicious criticisms of the opposition work to a similar effect, as they may mimic mudslinging and other discourteous practices. Some argue that limiting hate speech could infringe on First Amendment rights, but this perspective fails to recognize that its limitation does not inherently mean the prohibition of free speech. Instead, it prevents “hate speech from escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence,” all of which are illegal under international law (Guterres). Resultedly, limited hate speech not only preserves the civility of conversation but also other amendment rights, outweighing the losses of limited hate speech. If clear and effective parameters are set, limited hate speech could greatly benefit the

Read More

Arguments Against No Platforming

1136 Words | 5 Pages

On the opposition’s side, the key argument focuses on the issue that there is no clear definition of harm. The true definition of harm fails to differentiate between feelings of discomfort and the incitement to violence and genuine harm. Monica, argues that platforming shouldn’t be shut down solely due to certain individuals, but should work to restrict all forms of hate speech including racial, bigotry and fascist views. She explains that a platform allows for social justice, not only that but it promotes change, brings about social hierarchy and helps bring people of different backgrounds

Read More

More about Ethical Reasons To Censorship In The Toronto Symphony Orchestra

Related Topics

Open Document