ipl-logo

Ethics Of Torture Essay

1120 Words5 Pages

In Frankfurt, Germany in September 2002, Magnus Gäfgen was arrested for the kidnapping for ransom and murder of 11 year old Jakob von Metzler. However, he would be convicted and sentenced to life in prison a year after his crime was committed. After his arrest he refused to tell the officers where von Metzler was located, that is, until he was threatened with torture by the deputy police chief. He would then confess that he in fact had already murdered the child. In 2005, he complained of suffering from trauma caused by the threat of torture, and demanded some sort of compensation. Therefore, due to torture, even the threat of torture, being against German, the deputy police chief was sentenced to a short time in prison. The class was told …show more content…

Many say no torture because they fear it would “corrupt democratic institutions, diminish our moral authority in the world, cause torture to become routine and widespread in society, and arouse worldwide resentment and anger towards us” (688). They would say that torture is not morally permissible, and does not truly work. A non-consequentialist might believe that torture disregards human life, and is disrespectful, no matter what the other has done. They would say that the answer to torture “is an absolutist no - torture is the use of a person merely as a means, a clear instance of a lack of respect for a human being. Torture is therefore always wrong” (687). However, even though someone may think torture is wrong, most have an exception to their belief. Some are even “convinced that the use of torture is inevitable” (688). A Kantian would say that the respect of the human rights of the kidnapper is still important, and that by threatening to torture him, it is saying that his rights are invalid. Though, he may have not have respected the life of Jakob von Metzler, that is

Show More
Related
699 Words | 3 Pages

Mahatma Gandhi, the preeminent leader of the Indian independence movement states “You can chain me, you can torture me, you can even destroy this body, but you will never imprison my mind.” This is important because torture is brutal on the body and mind. The article “Torture’s Terrible Toll” by John McCain is more convincing then the article “The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin because McCain provides more logical reasoning, he adds his own personal experience of being a captured prisoner during the Vietnam War, and he creates an emotional bond with people around the world. Through more logical reasoning McCain Argument is more valid than Levin.

Read More
295 Words | 2 Pages

After finding some torture tactics, it helped me research about the negative effects of torture. In his article, “Torture is a Crime”, Curt Goering listed the negative effects of torture. He argues that torture is illegal, ineffective, immoral and makes those around us unsafe. Curt uses ethos in his piece to back up his main argument. For example, he mentions that in 1984, the UN adopted the Convention against torture and it was ratified by the U.S. Senate in 1990.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

In Michael Levin’s “The Case for Torture”, he uses many cases of emotional appeal to persuade the reader that torture is necessary in extreme cases. There are many terms/statements that stick with the reader throughout the essay so that they will have more attachment to what is being said. Levin is particularly leaning to an audience based in the United States because he uses an allusion to reference an event that happened within the states and will better relate to the people that were impacted by it. The emotional appeals used in this essay are used for the purpose of persuading the reader to agree that in extreme instances torture is necessary and the United States should begin considering it as a tactic for future cases of extremity. One major eye catching factor of this essay is the repetitive use of words that imply certain stigmas.

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

In Michael Levin's The Case for Torture, Levin provides an argument in which he discusses the significance of inflicting torture to perpetrators as a way of punishment. In his argument, he dispenses a critical approach into what he believes justifies torture in certain situations. Torture is assumed to be banned in our culture and the thought of it takes society back to the brutal ages. He argues that societies that are enlightened reject torture and the authoritative figure that engage in its application risk the displeasure of the United States. In his perspective, he provides instances in which wrongdoers put the lives of innocent people at risk and discusses the aspect of death and idealism.

Read More
1050 Words | 5 Pages

While analyzing “The Torture Myth” and “The Case for Torture”, it is very clear to see the type of rhetorical appeals used to persuade the audience. Anne Applebaum, the writer of “The Torture Myth” --in context of the decision of electing a new Attorney General--would argue that torture is very seldomly effective, violates a person’s rights, and should be outlawed due to the irrational need upon which physical torture is used. On the other hand, Michael Levin strongly argues that physical torture is crucial to solving every imminent danger to civilians. Levin claims that if you don’t physically torture someone, you are being weak and want to allow innocent people to die over something that could have been simply done.

Read More
918 Words | 4 Pages

In the reading “The Case for Torture” written by Michael Levin, and published on the June 7th, 1982 edition of Newsweek. Levin argues in favor of torture as an acceptable way of obtaining information when innocent lives are at stake. Outlining three separate scenarios devised to make the reader reconsider the stance on torturer in order to protect the interest of those in the western area. The strength of this text is that the absence of reasoning does not strike the reader; he is overcome by Levin’s ability to break ethical decisions down to black and white. Levin begins with describing torture as “morally mandatory”.

Read More
1854 Words | 8 Pages

Torture is mainly seen as morally wrong. The Los Angeles Times wrote about what the readers think about torture. In the article Torture is wrong: Readers agree, even if most Americans might not, discusses the opinions of their readers on how morally wrong torture can be even if it’s to a terrorist. One of the responses on the Los Angeles Times was from Martin Wauson of Westminster saying, “Injuring or killing an informant defeats the purpose of interrogation” (Los Angeles Times). The point of interrogating a terrorist is to gain information on what ever the problem may be.

Read More
962 Words | 4 Pages

08 Feb. 2016. This source explains that torture is actually one of the last methods used when they are interrogating someone since many know that it has a very low success rate. If the person is not willing to cooperate, they go down a list. Many people thought to use the top methods as they are not as immoral. Getting to the end of the list thought means they have nothing else to make the person talk which is why they use

Read More
587 Words | 3 Pages

Page 1 of 3 Medieval torture devices The period known as middle ages stands out as one of the most violent wars in history. It lasting a solid 1,000 years, from the 5th century to the 15th, was a time of lots of inequality and brutality in most of Europe. What really puts the apart is there violent ways of brutal torture methods. There were many ways of brutal torture in Europe.

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

To trust the information given by a terrorist who is under countless hours of torture really can do more harm than good. When a terrorist is tortured they go under five documented types of torture this includes: stress positions, sensory deprivation, sleep deprivation, constant noise, and starvation. Sean O’Mara, a professor of experimental brain research at Trinity College Dublin, released an article talking how the brain works under fear, starvation, thirst, extreme temperatures, immersion in water, and sleep deprivation. O’Hara states, “These stressors create problems for memory, mood and thinking, and sufferers, predictability, produce information that is deeply unreliable” (O’Mara) he goes on to state, “I don’t know why more scientists

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

In 2002, Magnus Gäfgen abducted the eleven year old Jakob von Metzler, the son of a prominent Frankfurt banker (Harvard University, 2011). When the kidnapper was captured by the police, he refused to tell where he had hidden the boy, leading the deputy police chief Wolfgang Daschner to threaten Gäfgen with tortue (Harvard University, 2011). In the midst of the media hysteria a question of morality emerged: was the threat of torture justified in trying to save the boy's life? Whereas utilitarian ethics would assert that the threat is justified if saving the innocent boy's life maximizes overall utility; Kant’s deontological theory of absolute ends dictates respect for the criminal’s human dignity regardless of his crime (Sandel, 2009). This

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

Should torture be acceptable in our society seems to be the day old question. First, one must know what torture actually is; torture is the action or practice of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment to force them to do or say something, or for the pleasure of the person inflicting the pain. Torture is wrong and should not be acceptable in our society because it is ineffective, morally wrong, and it violates the rights of human dignity of the victim. The 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights states, “no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment.”

Read More
777 Words | 4 Pages

It is wrong, self-defeating and poisons the rule of law, replacing it with terror and no one is safe when governments allow its use. 155 countries have ratified the UN Convention Against Torture. Between January 2009 and May 2013, Amnesty International received reports of torture and other ill-treatment committed by state officials in 141 countries, and from every world region. It can be seen from this report that torture is being practiced everywhere in the world and instead of such cases receding, they are on the rise now. Even International Law takes the Kantian view in the case of torture and forbids using it at all costs.

Read More
1805 Words | 8 Pages

Outcome For years I’ve had an odd fascination with torture and as such I decided to use torture in my question for Research Project. A question I will answer in this article, to the best of my ability. The question I ask is, “Are modern torture methods in any way more ethical than torture methods used throughout history?”. However before I can answer this question I have to define a few key parts, namely “What is torture?”

Read More
1873 Words | 8 Pages

Torture as a form of interrogation dates back to 530AD, when Roman jurists espoused the virtues of torture as “the highest form of truth” (Ross, 2005, p. 4). Greek legal orator Demosthenes believed that “no statements made as a result of torture have ever been proved untrue”. Torture can be defined as an act inflicting mental or physical pain and suffering in order to obtain information, punish, intimidate or for any reason from a person or a third person. The 20th Century saw a revival of torture techniques against perceived opponents of the state, and priority was given to state security. The Stalinist regime of the 1930s used torture to instil terror into the population, marking a convergence away from its traditional use to generate confessions (Green, 2011).

Read More

More about Ethics Of Torture Essay

Related Topics

Open Document