ipl-logo

Ethos In Julius Caesar And Mark Antony

640 Words3 Pages

Mark Antony Over Marcus Brutus One can see as they read through Mark Antony’s and Marcus Brutus’ speeches, that they left a major effect on the crowd at Julius Caesar’s funeral. The varied reactions out of the crowd were based on the rhetoric these two characters illustrate. They both exercised parts of ethos, pathos, and logos. Mark Antony’s speech at Caesar’s funeral had more effect on the people of Rome. He forced the people to think and controlled his rhetoric very well to make the crowds listen to him. His appeal was purposed towards making the crowds turn against Brutus. Antony twisted their thoughts into believing what he wanted them to believe. Antony used all three modes of persuasion: ethos, logos, and pathos. Antony begins his long speech by saying, …show more content…

He showed that he cared about what happened to Caesar, and he didn’t just care about why it happened. Brutus was telling the people why he did it, he said, “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” The crowds bought it, but they didn’t start thinking hard on it until Antony brought it up and sarcastically said Caesar was an honourable man for doing so. Antony cared about Rome, but he wasn’t going to kill someone over it. Antony showed the crowd the sympathy he had for Caesar’s death by saying, “But yesterday the word of Caesar might have stood against the world; now lies he there. And none so poor to do him reverence.” By saying this, he shows the use of pathos to the crowd, and they completely bought it. Ethos, Logos, and Pathos were used all throughout the speeches. Mark Antony and Marcus Brutus were trying to make the crowd like them, but Mark Antony did a much better job proving his loyalty and trustworthiness. The crowd was effected more from Antony’s because he was subtle by proving Brutus to be the bad guy. We can all learn from how to persuade people by using these three modes of persuasive

Show More
Related

Examples Of Ethos And Logos In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

861 Words | 4 Pages

In Act III, Scene 2 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Marc Antony is able to change the mood of the crowd. The commoners transform from a confused, depressed group of people to an angry mob wanting to get back at the conspirators for their despicable action. Antony manages to do so by using ethos, pathos, and logos. These three persuasive techniques all appeal to the audience in a different way. Ethos are phrases that relate to ethics or morals and make oneself sound fair and unbiased.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

526 Words | 3 Pages

He tries to ally himself with the people labeling them as friends and fellow Romans. Starting out on a sincere note that will earn him respect from the crowd. Following this, Antony urges the crowd to join him in mourning Caesar, and eventually, he is overcome with distress. After regaining his composure he goes on to tell them that Caesar had been silenced, and he expresses dissatisfaction that the crowd wasn’t mourning with him. He puts the idea of rebellion in the minds of his listeners, but he urges them not to act on it.

Read More

Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay

807 Words | 4 Pages

Antony knew this would have an impact on the plebeians and it certainly did. Finally Antony destroys Brutus’ argument. First off he reminds the plebeians that Caesar truly did care about all the people of Rome. “When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept” (III.2.90). He also brings up how he offered Caesar the crown three times and three times he refused it.

Read More

Julius Caesar Pathos

916 Words | 4 Pages

He uses pathos in more of a way to create fear and hostility among the people of Rome. He makes arguments against Brutus and his reasoning. Antony uses proof to show that what Brutus was saying was incorrect about Caesar being ambitious. In order to instill this fear within the crowd he starts off by saying, "The evil that men do lives after them; the good is oft interred with their bones. "

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Mark Antony's Speech

207 Words | 1 Pages

Mark Antony is trying to win over the people of Rome by his very effective use of rhetoric. In his speech, his overall point is to persuade the Roman citizens that Brutus’s claim of Caesar being ambitious is not true. Antony’s use of rhetorical devices such as a rhetorical question give the people a good message. When he is telling them that Caesar brought many captives to Rome, he asks, “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious” (3.2.18). Antony’s rhetorical question was very effective since he is making the people question Brutus’s claim.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

357 Words | 2 Pages

The Triumph of Emotional Appeal: Antony's Speech in Julius Caesar" Killing people isn’t a good thing and is rather a bad thing. Many people kill as they were convincing by others like how we see Brutus do to his best friend, Julius Caesar, who was killed. Although the group of senators tricked and ordered Brutus to kill Caesar because he was gaining too much support and power giving Brutus an advantage and more support, Antony delivers the more effective speech by showing us both ethos and pathos in his speech. Anthony uses pathos in his speech. He was my friend, faithful and just to me Act 3 scene 2, chunk 2 line 1.

Read More

Examples Of Ethos In Julius Caesar

638 Words | 3 Pages

Antony uses pathos, ethos, and logos to persuades the crowd. Antony angry by what the conspirators and Brutus did to Caesar by stabbing him twenty-three times in the capital. After Brutus talked, Antony told “them when poor cried, Caesar wept;”(3.2 93) with them in the bad times of what was going on in Roman. When Antony gave Julius Caesar the crown three times; Caesar denied the crown because

Read More

Mark Antony's Use Of Ethos In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

783 Words | 4 Pages

“Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (3.2.70). This was the first sentence of a speech that would change the minds of hundreds of Romans. In the play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, the demise of Julius himself leaves the city of Rome in shock, including his best friend, Mark Antony. In his funeral speech, he uses literary devices like ethos to show the ethical side of things, logos to show the logical thinking behind it all, and pathos to tug on people’s heart strings with emotions. Mark Antony gave a passionate speech that consisted of ethos, logos, and pathos to state facts on the situation that persuaded the citizens of Rome to make their opinions on Brutus and the other conspirators.

Read More

Brutus Ethos In Julius Caesar

1103 Words | 5 Pages

Have you ever felt your loneliest even when surrounded by those who claim to be your closest friends? Have you ever gotten that uneasy feeling in the pit of your stomach when putting your trust in someone who has stood by your side for years? If Julius Caesar, would have paid attention to his surroundings, he might have lived to see another day. In spite of his friendship with Caesar, Marcus Brutus took it upon himself and the conspirators, to kill Caesar. In their eyes, they saw Caesar’s initiative to control Rome as disastrous for the well-being of the people.

Read More

Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar

818 Words | 4 Pages

In the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech

721 Words | 3 Pages

This is ethos in the way it gives him credibility as a friend, suggesting that he would truly know Caesar. But, it is also pathos because it makes the crowd sorrowful for him because someone that is close to him has been killed. The use of ethos, logos and pathos made Marc Antony’s argument and speech far superior to Brutus’s. Another reason that makes Marc Antony’s argument more valuable is

Read More

Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech

884 Words | 4 Pages

Marcus Junius Brutus and Mark Antony both deliver speeches to justify the death of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE and both use Logos and Ethos to convince the Roman citizens to join their sides. Both sides deliver their speeches with vehemence and start by elucidating why Brutus killed Caesar to begin with, why Antony’s desire for revenge is justified, and what the future of Rome will be because of his death. Antony teases the citizens of Rome with the will of Caesar that he holds in hand and claims it will dishonor Brutus and the other conspirators and is also one of his vital uses of Ethos in his speech. Most of the citizens, if not all of them side with Antony and will most likely help him accede to a great title of power in the future and also betray Brutus because of what Antony has them believe, i.e. an ignoble assassin. Brutus and Antony 's speeches were both compelling, although Antony´s speech was more successful, but it is because he was able to manipulate the people of Rome with

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Mark Antony's Speech

373 Words | 2 Pages

Antony is trying to find out whether they believe if Brutus had a valid reason to assassinate Caeser. He achieves his goal of making the murder seem unethical by using his convincing argument. Overall, Mark Antony’s speech was helpful in trying to convince the Plebeians. By the end of his speech, the Plebeians believed that the murder of Julius Caesar by the conspirators was an unrightful doing. The conspirators might’ve gotten away with the murder, but will never be seen the same by the

Read More

Rhetorical Appeals In Brutus

755 Words | 4 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar one of the main characters Caesar is killed in Scene 3 act 2.Then Brutus and Antony both give speeches about how bad they feel. Brutus gives a good speech by using all three of the rhetorical appeals to persuade the crowd to want to listen to what he say by using logos,ethos,pathos to his advantage. Brutus gives a better speech that draws the audience attention,Antony not as much. Therefor here are some very valid points on why Brutus’s speech used the Rhetorical Appeals better.

Read More

Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logo Analysis

754 Words | 4 Pages

In this scene Caesar has been murdered by the conspirators including Brutus. Brutus is one of Caesar's good friends who is driven by honor; who thought Caesar’s ambition was going to be the end of Rome. Antony is a very loyal friend of Caesar’s who does not agree with the conspirators. Brutus and Antony are both smart well thought out characters. They desire to persuade the commoners to their side of the situation.

Read More

More about Ethos In Julius Caesar And Mark Antony

Related Topics

Open Document