ipl-logo

Euthyphro Problem Essay

1540 Words7 Pages

In this essay, I will discuss the Euthyphro problem, which is a question about morality and supernaturalism. And I tried to respond to the following questions: How do I understand the Euthyphro problem? Is it a dilemma? What’s the best way to respond to it? I will consider the best objection to my position and say how I would respond to it.
What is the Euthyphro problem, and how do I understand it?
In Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates asks Euthyphro a question that became known as the Euthyphro problem. Socrates poses the following question in the article: “Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (Plato 1981:10a) Socrates discusses the bond between the pious and the love of the …show more content…

In the first suppose, it demonstrates that the virtue of something being pious originates from themselves and that the property of being pious is not determined by the gods if they love it for being pious. In this instance, even when gods love them, the value of holy goods cannot rise since the virtue already belongs to them and was not imparted by the will of the gods. In the second response, if anything is pious because the gods love it, then it can only be pious if it also gets their love; an object cannot be pious without the gods' love. After I discuss the original Euthyphro problem, I believe we have a basic understanding of it and can approach the Euthyphro problem for theists in a similar way. Theists, such as Christians, hold the belief that there is only one supreme being in the cosmos who is omnipotent, omniscient, and monotheistic and who both initially created and continues to influence the cosmos today. As a result, the god created everything in the cosmos, morality as well as mountains, water, soil, animals, and people. God is the source of all righteous …show more content…

However, as I already stated, if the god is a good tracker, this question contradicts the fundamental premise of theists. Nothing existed at first until God created everything. He gives mankind commands on what they should do because he is aware of the things that can improve humans’ quality of life. If the god is a good tracker, then theists' divine command theory is incorrect, but divine command theory is a fundamental belief held by theists, hence if it is incorrect, the entire concept of theists is incorrect. Second, where do the valuations of good things originate from if the god is not a source of good? Is that from a higher power? But as there is no being greater or better than the god, the god should be the highest and best being in the universe. The god must therefore be the origin of morality and ethical ideals. Overall, it makes more sense for the god to be a good

Open Document