ipl-logo

Euthyphro Problem Essay

1540 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Euthyphro dilemma paper

In this essay, I will discuss the Euthyphro problem, which is a question about morality and supernaturalism. And I tried to respond to the following questions: How do I understand the Euthyphro problem? Is it a dilemma? What’s the best way to respond to it? I will consider the best objection to my position and say how I would respond to it.
What is the Euthyphro problem, and how do I understand it?
In Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, Socrates asks Euthyphro a question that became known as the Euthyphro problem. Socrates poses the following question in the article: “Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (Plato 1981:10a) Socrates discusses the bond between the pious and the love of the …show more content…

In the first suppose, it demonstrates that the virtue of something being pious originates from themselves and that the property of being pious is not determined by the gods if they love it for being pious. In this instance, even when gods love them, the value of holy goods cannot rise since the virtue already belongs to them and was not imparted by the will of the gods. In the second response, if anything is pious because the gods love it, then it can only be pious if it also gets their love; an object cannot be pious without the gods' love. After I discuss the original Euthyphro problem, I believe we have a basic understanding of it and can approach the Euthyphro problem for theists in a similar way. Theists, such as Christians, hold the belief that there is only one supreme being in the cosmos who is omnipotent, omniscient, and monotheistic and who both initially created and continues to influence the cosmos today. As a result, the god created everything in the cosmos, morality as well as mountains, water, soil, animals, and people. God is the source of all righteous …show more content…

However, as I already stated, if the god is a good tracker, this question contradicts the fundamental premise of theists. Nothing existed at first until God created everything. He gives mankind commands on what they should do because he is aware of the things that can improve humans’ quality of life. If the god is a good tracker, then theists' divine command theory is incorrect, but divine command theory is a fundamental belief held by theists, hence if it is incorrect, the entire concept of theists is incorrect. Second, where do the valuations of good things originate from if the god is not a source of good? Is that from a higher power? But as there is no being greater or better than the god, the god should be the highest and best being in the universe. The god must therefore be the origin of morality and ethical ideals. Overall, it makes more sense for the god to be a good

Show More
Related
467 Words | 2 Pages

Euthyphro curates the comparison that Piety is the part of justice concerned with the well being of the gods, while the remaining part of justice concerns the well being of the men. Socrates says that Euthyphro seems to phrase that debate very well but he still needs more information. Being knowledgeable of Socrates and knowing how he is and how he works asking for "a bit of information" can be ominous

Read More
1310 Words | 6 Pages

Religion and profound quality, in his view, are so firmly related that neither one of the ones can exist separated from the other. Dissimilar to the Sophists, who were familiar with think about the requests of ethical quality as just the wants of the general population who planned them, Socrates has faith in a standard of profound quality that is something more than the human conclusion. He distinguishes it with

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Everyone can have a different ideas about what the gods love or the gods hate. Another thing that could be argued is what is truly the definition of holy and unholy, again people are going to differ. Euthyphro’s third definition is partially stronger than the second but it still raises the same negative questions and differences in opinion and Socrates brings up in his

Read More
787 Words | 4 Pages

Euthyphro offers three different definitions for holiness. The first definition is that piety is what the gods love. Socrates argues that if there is more than one god, then different gods would find different things pious. Furthermore, Socrates asks if something is pious because they are loved, or are they loved because they are pious? Plato 5 - "The 'Path'" Euthyphro fails to give a reason for why certain things may be loved or not by any of the gods.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates, throughout the text, questions Euthyphro’s understanding of piety, which is based on traditional religious morality. Moreover, Euthyphro raises questions about the nature of morality that have been debated by philosophers for centuries and continue to be relevant in the modern day. Additionally,

Read More
484 Words | 2 Pages

Socrates dissatisfied with this definition begins to push Euthyphro to think on his argument of pious and impious rather than an example. Taken back from what Socrates has just told him that he attempts to define pious but instead proposes the possibilities of pious, not a definition. Socrates explained to Euthyphro that the correct definition would help him argue against Meletus’ charges of impiety. He attempts to answer Socrates’ question once more by stating that pious is a form of

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

The Euthyphro dilemma then arises as Socrates presents a careful argument to portray the two cannot be the same, as what is pious is not equivalent to what is loved by all the gods. Following this reasoning, the two determines the pious is beloved by the gods because it is holy, and the other is it is holy because it is beloved of the gods. Then, Socrates suggests to Euthyphro the dilemma given his definitions because when asked about the essence of piety, he has given the characteristics only and not the nature of

Read More
923 Words | 4 Pages

These same two things could be pious or impious? I object with the argument against this conclusion because we have to different definitions here with piety. Euthyphro is presser to define what piety is, to over think the action he is about to commit by charging his father is pious or impious. He comes up with “what’s loved by the gods is pious, and what’s not loved by the gods is impious”. How we can we be a sure that what he is doing in fact is impious and not pious.

Read More
1330 Words | 6 Pages

A10 Socrates comes to the conclusion that some of the same things are both loved and hated by the gods, as the Greek gods are very often at odds with each other and almost always disagree with each other on what they hold dear. In fact, many gods dislike what is dear to the other gods and, going by Euthyphro’s definition, this would cause those things that share both the love and animosity of the gods would be both pious and impious at the same time.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

This was also discussed throughout the short film. Individuals vouching that their gods care about morality had more fair approaches and beliefs towards people. Religion regulates morality and beliefs, including the thought

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

If the second point were correct, then morality would be above God and God would simply be a messenger of said morality. This would make it so that there

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

As evident in the dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro, whatever the gods justify as virtuous is unquestionable because holiness is dependent on God (Indiana University 18). Euthyphro states, the holy is that which is loved by gods (Indiana University 18). Something is moral if it pleases God. God being good, He loves only that which is good thus He wills to be moral only that which is good. The understanding of the goodness of God should be done metaphysically and not morally.

Read More
715 Words | 3 Pages

The second, Socrates asks Euthyphro, have you known what a piety is if your attitude is confident that you indict your father for a crime. (Plato (1997), p.77.). Socrates tries to look for one standard definition of piety. Let, have a look at what piety means to Euthyphro. He comes up with the several suggestions about piety: “to prosecute a wrongdoer is pious and not to prosecute is impious”; “what all the gods hate is impious, and what they all love is pious”; “where there is piety there is also justice” (Plato (1997), p.88.).

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The last theory is Aristotle’s virtue ethics which states that we should move from the concern towards good action and to focus on the concern with good character. This paper argues that Aristotle’s virtue ethics is better than the other ethical theories. The divine command theory says that what is morally right and what is morally wrong is determined by God and God alone. People who follow the divine command theory believe that God is the creator of all things, therefore, he must also be the creator of morally right and wrong acts.

Read More

More about Euthyphro Problem Essay

Related Topics

Open Document