In Aristophanes’ Clouds it wasn’t just for Strepsiades to beat his father because although Strepsiades was a bad citizen, that doesn’t give it a right to beat his own father. In Plato’s Euthyphro, I think Socrates felt the same way that it isn’t really ‘just’ that Euthyphro should prosecute his own father because he was in great shocked that Euthyphro is doing such bold move and this is a big crime in Greek society. This is why Socrates kept questioning Euthyphro reason for prosecution with holy and unholy and impious and pious.
The moral of “submission to the gods” and obedience, in general, can be seen in both these following examples that drastically changed Antigone and Creon’s life. Antigone was sentenced to death by Creon for burying her brother, Polyneices, who Creon declared was a traitor thus should not be buried. Not only does Antigone have the urge to bury him because he is her brother but also because it is what the gods declare as right and moral. Creon refused to directly kill her so he sent her away to die of natural causes. Soon, after a visit from the prophet, Tiresias, Creon realizes the wrong he has done and tries to fix it, but he is too late.
As Law describes, the dilemma looks at the arbitrary nature of what is considered "good ." He states that this dilemma creates the possibility of an objective and non-natural standard of morality alongside an evil God. The dilemma's ambiguity is shown by the following: "Does God decree this because He recognizes that stealing and murder are, independently, wrong, or are they wrong only because he decrees them to be so?" (Law, 365). In his paper, however, he does state that this argument is one that he foresees as being a potential line of attack for those rejecting his symmetry thesis.
He does as such for a few reasons. In any case, he doesn't trust that one's obligation toward a perfect being ought to be viewed as something that is partitioned and particular from his obligation toward his kindred men. In actuality, he holds that the main genuine method for rendering administration to God comprises in doing what one can to advance the good and otherworldly improvement of people. Second, Socrates respects the reason and capacity of religion as something that is unique in relation to the view communicated by Euthyphro. Rather than religion being utilized as a sort of hardware or gadget for getting what one needs, as was valid for Euthyphro's situation, Socrates trusts the basic role of genuine religion is to carry one's own life into amicability with the will of God.
Plato challenges an individual to follow his conscience. Socrates is challenged with facing death or escaping and relocating to a new area where others will not know of his prior sentence. It is a decision of whether to follow your conscience and do what you consider the right thing to do or to disregard the issue and feel guilty about it for the rest of your life. In the end, Socrates feels he must see the sentence out even if it means death but he is sending a message to his family that he is not above any laws…there is a reason for laws and others must be willing to abide by those laws otherwise there could be mass chaos to follow (Plato, Crito, n.d.).
In the Oedipus myth sophocles conveys a common theme that transcends into antigone as well. The oedipus myth does start the theme of fate and god’s law ruling over all;whilst fate is a big deal in the story, the main theme is that god's law rules over all. In “Antigone” Sophocles conveys that God’s Law is more important than Man’s Law by Antigone directly disobeying Man’s law so she could obey God’s law,by teiresias saying that creon should change his decision because the god’s don’t approve, and by Creon losing everything because he disobeyed God’s law. Antigone directly disobeys Man’s law so she can obey god’s law. Antigone proves that god’s law is more important than man’s law by earning the opinion of the people by following god’s law
Similarly, cheating on an exam is wrong because (a) you are simply relying on someone who has worked hard in order to prepare for the exam which is extremely unfair and (b) you are defeating the whole purpose of taking classes and attending school, which is to learn, which is why God forbids you to do so. The second and third premise are purposefully crafted to lead to a conclusion that the Divine Command Theorist cannot accept, therefore deeming the theory in itself false. If the Divine Command Theorists accepts the second option in premise one, that entails that morality is independent of God’s will. Accepting the first alternative leads to the disturbing possibility that if God commanded murder or torture, those actions would be deemed moral. Plato structured the argument through Socrates dialogue with an intent to demonstrate that religion requires more depth than simply accepting arbitrary beliefs.
“May it be for the best. If it so please the gods, so be it.” (Cooper 44). Socrates states that if it pleases the gods then thats whats supposed to happen. Socrates has his morals that he grew up with and so does everyone else.
In Euthyphros actions to prosecute his father he relies on this statement. Even though, he considers himself as pious man, Euthyphro is pious in prosecuting his father. Look at Euthyphros notion “to prosecute a wrongdoer is pious and not to prosecute is impious”. Let imagine this case as his father is guilty and he would hide it from authorities, from
Temptation is the desire to Do something that is either good or bad. Temptation is presented through various forms in all cultures and can be found everywhere. Even though temptation is shown as an bad, can it be beneficial for majority of people? In Greek mythology there is a well known example; Pandora’s box and is an example of temptation as well as showing very serious and negative results if given into temptation. Gods created Pandora to punish man Gave Pandora gifts including a box Told not to open box Heard voices to open up the box When she did open the box, curses like death, illness etc.
Believers of God think that doing good deeds is being moral and thus these actions will save them from their sins. They believe that following God’s will, that is the 10 commandments and in the new commandments stated in the New Testament is the written and visible basis for these actions found in the Holy Bible. . Others believe that being moral is not just following the 10 commandments. Many instances already happened where people are already confused about what is good and what is not. Instances like doing an unethical action in order to save others or give justice; this example is best shown in the movie Robin Hood.
Socrates in his dialogue was pushing further with the idea that it is worse to do injustice than to suffer injustice, a clime which was objected by Polus. For Polus says that many people who do injustice are happy, but Socrates insists otherwise. Socrates focuses on Eudaimonia, which means happiness, as the main objective to reach. Thus the people who do injustice like kings and tyrants are unhappy. Socrates then asks Polus which is more shameful doing injustice or suffering it, and Polus replies that doing injustice is more shameful.
The last theory is Aristotle’s virtue ethics which states that we should move from the concern towards good action and to focus on the concern with good character. This paper argues that Aristotle’s virtue ethics is better than the other ethical theories. The divine command theory says that what is morally right and what is morally wrong is determined by God and God alone. People who follow the divine command theory believe that God is the creator of all things, therefore, he must also be the creator of morally right and wrong acts.
Aristotle founded the idea that all the best arguments have three key parts: ethos, pathos and logos. Translated from latin, this means ethical, emotional and logical. In the play Antigone by Sophocles, the characters frequently make use of these tools when attempting to persuade another character to conform to their beliefs and thoughts. Antigone tries to get her sister, Ismene, to help her in a crime that she believes is just. Haimon attempts to lessen Antigone’s sentence by lecturing his father about what it means to be a good leader, and the Chorus is just trying to help out anyone they can with wise words from a third party opinion.
If a person knows what is ‘good’, then their manner of behaviour will always be good, as they possess the knowledge of how to do so. If a person acts in a ‘bad’ or evil way, this is simply because they lack the knowledge of how to act in a virtuous manner. For Socrates, it was simply a case of knowledge being conducive to good behaviour, and ignorance being conducive to bad behaviour. No-one chooses to act in an evil way, according to Socrates. We aim for good behaviour but fall short of
