ipl-logo

Examples Of Correspondence Theory

823 Words4 Pages

Introduction
Correspondence theory can be looked at as the most common and widespread method of understanding the nature of truth and falsehood. This theory maintain in reasoning that truth is whatever is in agreement to reality. Therefore any idea which is in agreement with reality is true while any idea which does not corresponds with reality is false. The main features of correspondence theory which are discussed in the subsequent paragraphs includes; there exists an independent realm of fact (reality), truth is the correspondence of belief with fact, belief corresponds to facts (truth), and belief does not corresponds to facts (false) (Pecorino, 2000).
There exists an independent realm of fact (reality): In this feature, it can be notice …show more content…

For example, “whales are fish” is true just in case whales, in fact are fish. Therefore with this feature, a statement can be true or false depending on the believe of anyone. So having full confidence that a claim is true does not makes it true, and having enough evidence to make a claim true will never makes it true. The only thing that can make the claim true is the relevant facts of the matter, but not what anyone think or believe on the …show more content…

Therefore it helps us to always reconsider and reevaluate any action.
The major weaknesses of correspondence include; the objection recognizes moral truth, but rejects the idea that reality contains moral fact for moral truths to corresponds to. Furthermore, the logical positivists recognized logical truth, but reject logical facts.
What I found appealing about coherence theory is the fact that it explains how scientists can make claims about the very large and small objects using a system of claims already accepted to be true. With this, scientists could save a lot and even move to perfection with necessary going through much protocol.
What I found discouraging is the fact that this accept proposition as true simply because it agree with other true propositions. I think digging more to better understand the facts before agreeing will helps in strengthening the

Open Document