In the eyes of our fellow classmate Friar L was not guilty which is a two way deal. Personally he is guilty. Friar is guilty in my eyes because he had no remorse for what he did. The other reason was because when we did the mock trial I was the judge in that so I say there and listened to the witnesses closely even tho they weren’t that great at telling I would have found him guilty. He would have been guilty because the defence team didn’t really help him in his case they asked him questions that would prove him guilty. Other people might say that he is not guilty because he was just trying to help. Maybe he was but he still had done something that would have been able to be solved if they would have just told their parents. The first reason is that Friar L was a priest and that he should never had married them in the first place. When Romeo came into the church and said that he was to be married to Juliet that night he should have said no. Juliet was about 13 when Romeo was 18. I get that people died early in that age but still he never should have married them without their parents permission. He married them because they were madly in love. ‘’It cannot countervail the exchange of joy that one short minuet gives me …show more content…
So he knew what they were capable doing to themselves. Although he stopped them first he never stopped them the second time because he was to busy talking to the other Friar. If he knew the letter didn’t make it to Romeo he should have realized that he would have killed himself because he was so madly in love with Juliet. Juliet tried to kill herself after Romeo had gotten banished because she couldn’t live without him. What in his right mind did he think she wouldn't kill herself for finding Romeo dead because the letter you sent to him never got to him. You knew that they would have killed themselves or their parents would have killed each