Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay on the crucible
Individuality in the crucible
Paranoia and hysteria in the crucible
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A essay on the crucible
I am exploring the question of are we are motivated by fear, human nature, and just how far we will go for our reputations. All three of theses are major themes in the Cucubile by Arthur Miller. And each theme plays a major part in how the Crucible was rounded while also showing a very strong perspective on how the author wanted the reader to perceive the crucible. The reason I think that we continue to read, study, and perform the Crucible to this day is because it was a major part in history where many innocent people were killed due to fear and false accusations. The Crucible was written about a time period that Arthur Miller acknowledges as a time where fear and reputation totally took over.
Courage is measured by an individual’s willingness to continue fighting even when the likelihood of victory is small. In the play, “The Crucible”, written by Arthur Miller, it tests the courage of the villagers in Salem through situations created by greed, cowardice, and other evils in the world. Several characters display a great deal of courage but none demonstrate this trait more than John Proctor. John Proctor is a farmer who is characterized as a proud man. Through out the beginning of the play, Miller gives the readers little clues to suggest that John and Abigail had an affair.
Fear is of high importance of the human experience as it is a common emotion that all face. Our fears are often seen as a warning, triggering further impulsive responses when we believe we are in danger. Many have heard the phrase, “fight or flight,” however, there are typically four fear responses: fight, flight, freeze, and fawn. Such responses cause physical and emotional acts to be drawn out (Amy Marschall, 2021). The characters in The Crucible demonstrate each of these four fear responses as the witch trials begin in Salem.
Individual voices challenge and disagree societal beliefs in many ways. The society in the story is indifferent and is can sometimes be really fragile because of all the events and is in some cases can be really brutal. Although the story does take place in the 19th century, it conveys the force of society through its setting in Salem, and the conflicts that arise. The characters in the story show societal beliefs through the making of masses and the opposing sides that were made through the development of the play. The use of the characters in the play help us identify the conflicts with each other and their society.
Throughout history the individual has constantly had to challenge society. The impact of individualism can either have a positive or negative affect. These affects can be shown in The Crucible through John Proctor and Abigail Williams. In The Crucible John Proctor shows the positive affects of individualism.
The Crucible teaches its readers the true application of authority along with the misuses of it. To begin with, the people of higher social status utilizes their position for their own gain. Parris uses his position as minister to make absurd demands. For instance, he complains that he is underpaid and request for two items: a higher salary and the deed of the meeting house. To argue, he declares that he is “ the Lord’s man in the parish”(1250).
“Character Analysis over The Crucible” Arthur Miller is a commonly-known playwright, most famous for his 1953 play, The Crucible. The basis for The Crucible came from the witch trials which occurred in Salem, Massachusetts during the puritan era. Miller even uses some of the same characters in his dramatized play that were a part of the original witch trials in Salem. However, Miller made a few alterations to the historical members of the Salem society in order to suit his dramatic purpose in The Crucible, particularly Abigail Williams, John Proctor, and Reverend Samuel Parris.
People’s thoughts, when expressed as words, have lots of power. When many people have the same or similar thoughts; those thoughts can lead to large numbers of people making very poor decisions and can affect the lives of many people. In the play The Crucible and during the era of McCarthyism in the 1950’s; thoughts of a few became the thoughts of many and led to some people being treated unfairly and punished for no reason. In the The Crucible, Abigail Williams began accusing other people of witchcraft.
After a close reading and synthesis of The Crucible it has come to my attention the similarities in how themes present in the play affect our seemingly modern society. Themes like hysteria and intolerance are prevalent in many current situations the same way they were in The Crucible, in a way blurring the line between past and present. “Bodies, and the subconscious, have their own language, rooted in the patients’ individual life experiences. Bodies can express things when words fail. ”(Bynum 2).
Great strength in voice is a key factor in Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible.” What the townspeople said always went. If someone was accused of being a witch, they were most likely judged guilty of being one due their lack of knowledge on the subject. Throughout this play, Miller strategically portrays the themes of judgment and justice through the voices of John Proctor, Reverend Hale and Deputy Governor Danforth.
[ looking up at the moon through the jail cell window ] I have been stripped of all my senses [ pause ]. I now know what true isolation feels like, this sense of loneliness. This place of darkness but for the moonlight seeping through the bars. Elizabeth who are you? [ pause ] Sitting here in this jail cell with the child I will soon bear.
The Salem witch trials were a time period when any individual could be accused of witchcraft for numerous reasons. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller focuses on the deviation of the trials and how the town’s most religious and honest members of the community are tried with witchcraft. John Proctor, the town’s most honest man, is accused of being a witch and must decide if he should confess or not. Proctor’s confession will stop the town from rebelling and uphold the reputations of Deputy Governor Danforth and Reverend Parris. Hale also wishes for Proctor’s confession so he does not have to feel responsible if Proctor were to be hanged for his witchcraft accusations.
Statements of Meaning People interpret different things in different ways, such as someone looking at a cross, some people just see it as two lines intersecting and some people look more deeply and see their religious beliefs. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, three definitions define this book in literal and metaphoric ways, including characters, their emotions, and the restrictions of the Puritan ways. To begin, the definition, container made of a substance that can resist great heat for melting, fusing, or calcining ores, represents a specific character, John Proctor. John Proctor is self-defensive and a man of his word. Proctor says, “There be no love for Satan in this house, Mister!”(Miller 33) and , he also says, “I have no knowledge
Shawn Jande Ms. Clancy American Literature B3 15 November 2015 The Crucible Analytical Essay Imagine, being accused of a crime you didn’t commit by your neighbors and friends out of jealousy, and desire. This is what many people in the town of Salem had to go through during the time of the Salem Witch Trials. People's motives such as: gaining and maintaining power, and aspirations for what other people had caused them to make irrational, and atrocious decisions. In The Crucible by Arthur Miller, desire and power drive characters to create chaos in the community.
I have been locked up for a week. I have been thinking a lot about my life and how it’s going to end any anytime now. I told the judge Danforth that I am pregnant. Unfortunately I am not going to be able to live with my baby because I am going to get killed a month after. The reason why I am going to get killed is because I was charred guilty.