ipl-logo

Examples Of Legal Formalism

2126 Words9 Pages

1 Introduction
Legal formulism falls under the broad umbrella of legal positivism and according to Alfred Cockrell it consists mainly of formal reasons. He states that these formal reasons have a ‘screen-like’ function in the sense that they render it useless for the decision maker to actually go beneath the rule and to make use of some sort of moral or political reasoning in order to justify why a decision was taken. No enquiry is undertaken into substantive or societal reasoning when cases are decided and legal rules are implemented. Due to this, there has been much criticism aimed towards legal formalism. This essay will investigate whether these criticisms are justified with reference to the viewpoints of legal realists and critical …show more content…

The most obvious criticism of this is that the idea of legal formalism seems to ignore the fact that judges are without any sort of prejudice or preconceived notions of what justice entails. In conjunction to this, it assumes that if judges were to have such ideas and visions that they would not apply it to their decision making process and would thus remain completely unbiased by any policy considerations. One could defend perhaps defend this flaw with reference to section 165(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 (hereon referred to as “the Constitution”). This section entails that the courts are independent entities which apply the law impartially and without favour or …show more content…

However, in order for judges to discover this intention, they would be guided by their own interpretation of what words mean in order to find the meaning of the legal text. This means that ‘mental make-up’ of a judge would have an influence from the very outset irrespective of how a decision is taken in a case later on.
3 2 Critical legal studies scholars’ criticism
Critical legal studies scholars seek to transform society in its entirety. This is achieved by remaining outside the law and rather participating in ‘legal insurgency’ in order to illustrate the political bias which exists the legal system. They argue that formalism cannot be as flexible as many imagine it to be and that techniques of legal reasoning which were used cannot justify more than one outcome. The reject the idea that each problem has a clear cut rule which is applicable and thus there has to be some underlying reason or political agenda which forms the basis of a decision under legal formalism.
3 3 Realist

Show More
Related

Summary Of Gerald Rosenberg's Book 'The Hollow Hope'

710 Words | 3 Pages

Alex Frost Values: Law & Society 9/23/2014 The Hollow Hope Introduction and Chapter 1 Gerald Rosenberg begins his book by posing the questions he will attempt to answer for the reader throughout the rest of the text: Under what conditions do courts produce political and social change? And how effective have the courts been in producing social change under such past decisions as Roe v. Wade and Brown v. Board of Education? He then works to define some of the principles and view points 'currently' held about the US Supreme court system.

Read More

Balance Of Power In New Spain Essay

609 Words | 3 Pages

wensby argues that the balance of power in 17th century New Spain is maintained through each individual’s involvement in society rather than a top bottom power structure. Power alone was not what upheld justice because each social level held the capacity to exercise power that was contingent on the complex set of social conventions of 17th century New Spain. The law cannot be separated from the social norms that were the members of New Spain valued. The legal system itself can attest to this argument, as the courts specifically the tribunal made rulings based social norms instead of solely the law. The supposed powerless did hold sway in their outcome, as we see with the cases Owensby presents.

Read More

How Did Earl Warren Impact On Society

800 Words | 4 Pages

The law is considered to be one of the most important aspects in a society. It establishes rules and regulations and sets guidelines and expectations for the people it governs. However, when the law is questioned by the people that uphold it, ideas and opinions begins to change. With a change of ideas, society begins to evolve and grow to accommodate the people in it. Earl Warren was appointed as the 14th Supreme Court Chief Justice in 1953, and for the many years that followed he made a lasting impression on the United States courts and their laws.

Read More

First Chapter Of Law In America By Lawrence M. Friedman

1164 Words | 5 Pages

The first chapter of “Law in America” by Lawrence M. Friedman is an introduction to the formation of the law system that we have in the United States today. The opening of the chapter depicts how Freidman starts his lectures, by reading the front few pages of the local newspaper to his very lethargic students who take his early class. At first, this seems odd given that this is not a political science class or media lecture. However, the logic behind this process is that in every “domestic” article in the news there is a connection to the law. Law is intertwined in almost every situation we face during, not only our day to day lives but also the very structure that forms the environment we live in.

Read More

Invitation To Law And Society Analysis

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Furthermore, from two scholarly perspectives, authors Richard Rothstein and Kitty Calavita, we can deepen our engagement with this relationship in their books, The Color of Law and Invitation to Law and Society, An Introduction

Read More

Nils Christie Essay

773 Words | 4 Pages

Lawyers also decide what is relevant in court, rather than letting parties decide what they believe to be relevant. Because of this, victims lose participation in their own case. Christie also discusses the types of segmentation and their effects on modern law. I agree with Christie’s views of modern law in regards to reduced participation of parties, the presence of too many specialists, and his view on segmentation. I agree with

Read More

Supreme Court Vs Circuit Court

965 Words | 4 Pages

This model hypothesizes that the judges follow the laws as written, until they are no longer clear. Then, it is each judge’s personal ideology and political attitude that guides them in their decisions. In following this logic, the judges can be, at times, unconstrained by the law and can operate dynamically, depending on who is serving. This can be used as a solid predictor for how each judge will decide.

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

Courts prove unsuccessful in achieving social change due to the constraints on the court’s power. Rosenburg’s assessment that courts are “an institution that is structurally challenged” demonstrates the Constrained Court view. In this view, the Court’s lack of judicial independence, inability to implement policies, and the limited nature of constitutional rights inhibit courts from producing real social reform. For activists to bring a claim to court, they must frame their goal as a right guaranteed by the constitution, leading to the courts hearing less cases (Rosenburg 11). The nature of the three branches also creates a system of checks and balances in which Congress or the executive branch can reverse a controversial decision, rendering the Court’s impact void.

Read More

Professor Ronald Dworkin's The Model Of Rules

1406 Words | 6 Pages

In his essay The Model of Rules I, Professor Ronald Dworkin argues against a certain theory of law he attributes to H.L.A Hart called “positivism.” While Dworkin argues against many tenets of the positivist theory, I will focus this essay on critical reasons against Dworkin’s argument against the legal positivist thesis that the law consist of nothing but rules. To do so, I will explain the necessary components of Hart’s theory of law required to understand Dworkin’s rebuttal. Then, I will reconstruct Dworkin’s argument against what I will classify “nothing but rules” claim, and I will ultimate claim Dworkin’s argument fails because his premise that states principles are extra-legal and cannot be explained as part of the categories is false. In particular, I indicate how principles can be legally binding like legal rules are, and I pick apart his reasons for believing that there are clear distinctions between laws and principles.

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Common Law System

1268 Words | 6 Pages

[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law

Read More

Dworkin's Theory Of Discretion

788 Words | 4 Pages

In hard cases, judges are not legislating, as Hart’s positivists assert, they are inducing based on principle. Judges have a duty not only to apply the rules, but also to make sure that the legal system is consistent with the principles of the society. When judges are said to legislate, they are not making the rules but discovering them. [20] According to Dworkin understanding the role of the courts is to defend the rights of citizens from the likelihood of unfair rules or other circumstances in which the written laws do not satisfactorily defend their natural rights.

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of A Humanistic Approach To The Study Of Law

1163 Words | 5 Pages

According to the radical critique of law, how does law discriminate? Along with many other policies, the law also stresses on the discrimination which

Read More

Essay On Giving Of Reason

2498 Words | 10 Pages

The entitlement to reasons is not only an ‘indispensable part of a sound system of judicial review’, as Professor Wade described it, but also ‘a healthy discipline for all who exercise power over others’ There are two basic underlying reasons for giving reasons: first, a general objective of fairness in the decision making process. Second, the facilitating of judicial review. Furthermore, the giving of reasons acts as a defense against arbitrary decision making, the practice of partisanship in our courts and it aids hugely in the appeals process. The three main sources of a duty to give reasons (The

Read More

Disadvantages Of Judicial Precedents

702 Words | 3 Pages

Different judges will have different interpretation of cases; hence, they may bind a single case with various precedents making it more difficult to pass a judgment. In this type of situation even competent judges may find it complicated to decide on the ‘ratio decidendi’. Nevertheless, there are a lot of case laws and deciding which case law best appropriates to a case is not always an easy task, as it is time consuming and very stressful to find the most suitable precedent. Therefore, not only the doctrine of judicial precedent has the disadvantage of being complex, while the judges are discussing which case law to apply to a specific case, justice is at the same time being delayed.

Read More

Personal Reflection On Law: A Personal Study Of Law

975 Words | 4 Pages

The law is an intriguing concept, evolving from society’s originalities and moral perspectives. By participating in the legal system, we may endeavour to formulate a link between our own unique beliefs and the world in which we live. Evidently, a just sense of legality is a potent prerequisite for change, enabling society to continue its quest for universal equality and justice. Aristotle once stated that "even when laws have been written down, they ought not to remain unaltered".

Read More

More about Examples Of Legal Formalism

Related Topics

Open Document