ipl-logo

Examples Of Marquis Future Of Value Principle

1450 Words6 Pages

Skill 3 Part 1: Explication of Marquis’ future of value principle In my essay, I will explain why Marquis thinks that the future of value principle provides a compelling view regarding the impermissibility of killing humans of all ages, aliens and fetuses. Then, I will explain why Marquis and McPhersan believe that the future of value principle applies to fetuses and animals respectively and that I agree with both of them. Finally, I will defend my argument against the future of value principle since I believe the principle is not adequate to explain the impermissibility of killing. I will use termination and killing synonymously in my essay. He defines a future of value as “ the loss … of all those activities, projects, experiences, and enjoyments… [constituting] my future personal life.” (Marquis, pg.4) Here is Marquis’ future of value principle as shown below: Premise 1: For all beings with a future of value, then killing them is considered impermissible (Marquis, pg.4). Premise 2: Fetuses have a future of value as well (Marquis, pg.7). Conclusion: Therefore, terminating a fetus through abortion is impermissible (Marquis, pg.7). Marquis defends Premise 1 by providing a couple of examples. Part 2: Does the future of value …show more content…

Marquis only justified that killing via euthanasia is only permissible on “[people] who are severely and incurably ill” and “who face a future of pain and despair” if they “wish to die” because they “will not have suffered a loss if they are killed” (Marquis, pg.6). However, Premise 1 does not explicitly state that it is impermissible to kill beings without a future of value at all but still have the will to live. Thus, the above scenario strengthens my argument by counterexample and disproves premise 1 of the future of value principle

Show More
Related

If I Never Had By Sinnot Armstrong Summary

311 Words | 2 Pages

1002215550 5. Sinnot Armstrong criticizes Marquis’s article and tries to refute the argument made by Marquis in his tendentious paper “You Can’t Lose What you Ain’t Never Had”. Firstly, he points out the Fallacy of Equivocation committed by Marquis on the word ‘Loss’. The word loss has two meanings which he shows with his race example while showing the ethics of abortion. In the race example he says that if there are two people running in a race and one is faster than the other and beats him; it is a neutral loss as the person who lost was not entitled to win.

Read More

Don Marquis Why Abortion Is Immoral Summary

1230 Words | 5 Pages

This is the problem he finds, ‘only persons’, it says nothing about infants, young children, the severely retarded, or the severely mentally ill. As anti-abortionist will change their view by saying it is wrong to end the life of a human being; the pro-choicer will change their view by extending the definition of a person to infants and young children. Marquis finds more and more problems with both of these views the more he keeps breaking it down. By these points mentioned above, it is clear why he is a third party view, because nothing about each view is factual and there is nothing about each view where there is actual

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Don Marquis

886 Words | 4 Pages

Furthermore, as mentioned in a lecture video, the argument that murder is only wrong due to wasted potential could be used to say mensuration, male masturbation, and contraception are all wrong as they lead to the death of sperm or an egg. Marquis' has attempted to say that these things aren't immoral as an egg or sperm cannot grow on their own, but neither can an embryo. It feeds on the mother and would die if removed from the

Read More

Lee And George Abortion Analysis

273 Words | 2 Pages

Patrick Lee and Robert George assert that abortion is objectively immoral. One of Lee and George’s main reason for coming to this conclusion is that human embryos are living human beings. This essentially validates that abortion is indeed the process of killing a human. Another main point said by the two is a rebuttal to a common argument used in favor of abortion, which states that a potential mother has full parental responsibilities only if she has voluntarily assumed them. The rebuttal to this was that the potential mother does indeed have special responsibilities to raise the child.

Read More

Don Marquis Argument Analysis

247 Words | 1 Pages

His outlook on the matter is, if we as humans believe that killing another human being (i.e., adult, child) is wrong, but we do not understand why, then why is it acceptable to kill a fetus when we do not know if it is considered a living being (Jones & Kooistra, 2011). Judith Jarvis Thomson, another

Read More

Summary Of A Defense Of Abortion Judith Thomson

1070 Words | 5 Pages

In “A Defense of Abortion,” Judith Thomson argues with a unique approach regarding the topic of abortion. For the purpose of the argument, Thomas agrees to go against her belief and constructs an argument based on the idea that the fetus is a person at conception. She then formulates her arguments concerning that the right to life is not an absolute right. There are certain situations where abortion is morally permissible. She believes that the fetus’s right to life does not outweigh the right for the woman to control what happens to her own body.

Read More

Analysis Of Why Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquis

1384 Words | 6 Pages

Essay On Why Abortion Is Immoral This article called “Why Abortion Is Immoral” written by Don Marquis argues and why abortion is prima facie impermissible. Marquis accesses both anti-abortion arguments and also pro-choicer’s claim to protect the legalization of abortion. My paper is going to understand and examine the the both sides arguments, and to attempt to recognize abortion is immoral.

Read More

Virtue Theory In Rosalind Hursthouse's Argument

2131 Words | 9 Pages

Hursthouse states, “... the status of the fetus - that issue over which so much ink has been split - is according to virtue theory, simply not relevant to the rightness or wrongness of abortion” (Hursthouse 164). Don Marquis argues that abortion is seriously wrong. Marquis does admit that his argument can include some exemptions which include such cases as

Read More

Mary Anne Warren's Rights Of Abortion

794 Words | 4 Pages

Warren’s claim is meant to support the idea that is acceptable to abort a fetus, which is considered a “potential person,” no matter what stage of development it is in because that would then be taking away the rights of the woman, which is considered an actual person. Unlike Warren, Patrick Lee and Robert P George claim “…

Read More

A Right To Self-Discrimination David Velleman Analysis

2030 Words | 9 Pages

In his article ‘A Right to Self-Termination?’ David Velleman brings up the topic of the right to die and elaborates his view on the subject. Two broad principles are stated by Velleman and he goes on to reject the first principle and accept the second principle. The first principle is that “a person has the right to make his own life shorter in order to make it better… ”the second principle is that there is “a presumption in favor of deferring to a person's judgment on the subject of his own good.

Read More

Abortion Rhetorical Analysis

1261 Words | 6 Pages

Abortion is not only a fluctuating concept in our society, but an ethical and emotional debate, as well. The image I have chosen presents concepts from a cultural and historical background, as well as presents an ethical, emotional, and logical appeal to the audience. The debate about abortion has simply been overblown and exhausted. The truth of the matter is, abortion is murder. Ending a life, whether innocent or guilty, is murder.

Read More

In My Future-Like-Ours Argument: Letter To Parents

230 Words | 1 Pages

Ilyaas Farah 09/27/2017 1720-91 Prof. Swartwood Letter to Parents Dear Parents, In my Future-Like-Ours Argument, I state: An act of killing is prima facie seriously morally wrong if it deprives a being of a future of value. Abortion is killing that deprives a being (the fetus) of a future of value.

Read More

Don Marquis's Argument Essay

479 Words | 2 Pages

Likewise, aborting a fetus is depriving it of a future. Marquis believes there is no requirement that a fetus be a person for it to be wrongful to abort it, but only that it have a future of value, similar to Eben. If it is wrong, or impermissible to kill Eben because it would deprive him of a future, then it is also wrong to abort the fetus.

Read More

Is Abortion Morally Permissible

632 Words | 3 Pages

The debate whether abortion is morally permissible or not permissible is commonly discussed between the considerations of the status of a fetus and ones virtue theory. A widely recognized theory of pro-choice advocates can be thought to be that their ethical view is that fetus’s merely are not humans because they lack the right to life since they believe a fetus does not obtain any sort of mental functions or capability of feelings. Although this may be true in some cases it is not in all so explaining the wrongness of killing, between the common debates whether a fetus does or does not obtain human hood, should be illustrated in a way of a virtuous theory. The wrongness of killing is explained by what the person or fetus is deprived of, such as their right to life; not by means of a heart beat or function of one’s body, but by the fact that it takes their ability of potentially growing into a person to have the same human characteristics as we do.

Read More

Essay On Why Abortion Is Wrong

992 Words | 4 Pages

The fetus should not be killed just because his/her parents were irresponsible. The fetus did not take the decision that his/ her parents would have sex or use contraception methods that are not very effective. The fetus is totally innocent and should not be punished. Each case can be analyzed to show that abortion is impermissible. In the case of

Read More

More about Examples Of Marquis Future Of Value Principle

Related Topics

Open Document