Brandon Do Mr. Mitchell English III 30 April 2023 Holden’s Naivete The “Nature vs. Nurture” debate is a widely known phenomenon that tackles the question of whether someone is more influenced by biological predisposition, or if one is influenced by society. A significant point for the “Nurture” side of the debate is the influence that peers close in someone's life have on said individual. Many teens nowadays show the importance of nurture through what they learn in media, with media allowing knowledge to be attained easily. Even so, with more knowledge than ever, even the most intelligent professed alumni can be naive, usually in their own ways. Like, Holden for example. Holden demonstrates his naivete regarding ideas of sex and intimacy in the book which was caused by his childhood as demonstrated through his interactions with the men he describes in the novel. …show more content…
While the naivete of the aforementioned is seen as generally negative, Holden demonstrates something beautiful, a self-righteous innocence. To explain, Holden always says he becomes “excited” when he talks of his beliefs about sex and intimacy with every character he interacts with in the novel. His compass on what is right and what is wrong never seems to stagnate. This basic and self-righteous idea of how sacred sex and intimacy must have completely been brought about by his childhood and thus is full of childish beliefs. He wants his ideas to come to fruition and mentally criticizes people who do not believe or do what he thinks is right. His “phony” lawyer dad and the disappearances of his two brothers have left Holden alone, with no healthily attached role model male figure in his life that he can look up to in his life. To conclude, his childhood has left him with this naivete and has also left him to tend to these fanatic and ideal beliefs of sex and