ipl-logo

Examples Of Southern Leaders Who Rebelled

855 Words4 Pages

The individual Southern leaders who rebelled should be punished. First, they should be taken out of government. If the ex-confederates stay in government, they will try to make laws that don’t abolish slavery, or don’t give African Americans full rights. Since many of them still believe in white supremacy, having them as leaders wouldn’t turn out well. This plan is better than President Johnson’s Reconstruction plan because even if they take an oath not to do anything against African Americans, their word can’t be trusted because they rebelled once and they could rebel again. Second, Southern rebels can be forgiven by the President and Congress, but they can never serve in office again. The Northerners will fill positions in Southern government …show more content…

military troops placed throughout the states to make sure the new laws are being enforced. President Johnson’s plan of the South running everything themselves is flawed because with absolutely no control from the North, there is no way to guarantee the laws are actually being followed. The troops will make a big impact on Reconstruction through the new laws being enforced. The individual states will not be punished for rebellion, rather only the Southern Rebel leaders. This means, people in the Southern states are citizens with rights and can vote. Individuals leading the rebellion are punished by not being able to vote. This is better than the Radical Republican’s plan of whole states being punished because through their plan everyone will feel too controlled, Southerners won’t feel like they’re part of the U.S., and the South might rebel again. All Southern Rebels can’t become part of the government until all laws of reconstruction have been thoroughly enforced throughout the whole country. This way, the North controls the government and laws about equality. President Jackson doesn’t think this should be the case, but if Southern rebels are let into government then we will never reach

Show More
Related
370 Words | 2 Pages

Chapter One Q: How did Union Commanders and President Lincoln characterize the “Nature of the Rebellion?” In regards to the nature of the rebellion, many Northerners, Republicans, and Union Commanders strongly believed in the theory that the South had been hoodwinked into secession by a wealthy slaveholding handful of upper class men which they referred to as the Slave Power Conspiracy. In addition, Southerners didn’t have much of a choice in the decision to the leave the union and accepted it as a fait accompli engineered by their social betters. Moreover, President Lincoln stated that “it may be well doubted whether there is, today, a majority of the legally qualified voters of any State, in favor of disunion.”

Read More
747 Words | 3 Pages

This policies including that the southern states could reestablish their government and it would be

Read More
589 Words | 3 Pages

The Civil War was one of America’s most trying and troubling times. Following the Civil War was Reconstruction, which posed an important question that would affect the country forever, “What do we do with the South?” During Reconstruction, the Government was faced with a plethora of difficult questions to answer and a series of difficult situations, but the topic at hand was the same reason the Civil War started in the first place: African Americans. The statement “After the Civil War, the only way to truly enfranchise former slaves was by effectively disenfranchising their former masters” is true because white Southerners would constantly and consistently attempt to undermine African Americans. There were many ways that white Southerners used to belittle African Americans; the creation of Black Codes were one of these ways.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

Reconstruction of the south encompassed three major political initiatives: restoration of the Union, transformation of southern society, and enactment of progressive legislation favoring the rights of freed slaves. President Abraham Lincoln’s Proclamation of Amnesty and Reconstruction—issued in 1863, two years before the war even ended—mapped out the first of these initiatives, his Ten-Percent Plan. Under the plan, each southern state would be readmitted to the Union after 10 percent of its voting population had pledged future loyalty to the United States, and all Confederates except high-ranking government and military officials would be pardoned. After Lincoln was assassinated in 1865, President Andrew Johnson adopted the Ten-Percent Plan and pardoned thousands of Confederate officials. Radical Republicans in Congress, however, called for harsher measures, demanding a

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Distinguished members of Congress, we the United States of America, have fought two years of this war, costly in both currency and lives, against a group of rebels, who against the Constitution seceded and formed the so-called “Confederate States of America,” but for what purpose are we fighting? We fight to end the brutal institution of slavery, to uphold our constitution and moreover to uphold this glorious union of all American states. How, you may ask, do we create a nation composed of persons of many different beliefs? We must firstly handle the issue of those engaged in the creation and protection of those treasonous states, next is the issue of use of the land of the rebel states, and finally we shall discuss the fractious issue of

Read More
639 Words | 3 Pages

The Reconstruction era of 1865 was an attempted unify the states of the United States of America after the Civil War. This proved to be terribly difficult and contentious process. The three main issues the federal government had to deal with included how to deal with states as they re-joined the Union, how Southern whites should be treated, and how to deal with the freed slaves. Furthermore, President Lincoln’s reconstruction plan included that states never truly seceded from the Union as this was not legally possible, and therefore they should not necessarily be punished. The plan had two major provisions: Pardons of Southerners who participated in the war if the took an oath of allegiance to the United States and Readmission of a state if 10% of white voters in that state took

Read More
606 Words | 3 Pages

The time period after the Civil War was a very interesting time. Just because the Civil War was over does not mean that all of the hard feelings would go away. Families had been separated during the war and many of them still believed in what they had been fighting for. The Union had to figure out a way to get the North and South to work as a team, yet many politicians had different views as to how this should be done. Another issue that began to rise was between the President and Congress.

Read More
1376 Words | 6 Pages

This divide in the government made it hard for the states to work together, and “the inability to take decisive action against slavery in the decades immediately following the Revolution permitted the size of the enslaved population to grow… eventually over 600,000 Americans would die… to resolve the crisis” (88). Had the Northerners spoken up for what they knew was right, the nation might have been able to civilly reach an agreement. However, since the Northerns chose silence, but did not conform to Southern ways, bitterness developed between the two sides, and years later the Civil War

Read More
883 Words | 4 Pages

Change is something that takes time, effort, and sometimes doesn't go as expected, especially with change regarding race and race relations. From 1865 to 1877, America tried to influence change with laws and force, as to make it happen faster. The Reconstruction Era was like game 7 of the 2016 World Series because there were times when one side was favored more than the other, and at times, it was impossible to tell who was going to win. Going into the last game of the 2016 World Series, the Indians were expected to win it all, being as they were the best team in baseball, and during the Reconstruction Era, the Northern's had most of the control going into this time period. Firstly, the 13th Amendment, which was passed when the new state

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

However, these differences show that the North and South were actually two distinct countries held together by one constitution. The North felt that decisions regarding slavery and its legality were entrenched in the central government while the South felt that such decision belonged to the individual states. In the times preceding the war, both sides could not reach a compromise. Bonner mentions, “Because secession and war were permitted to come, warned Russel, "We are not entitled to lay the flattering unction to our souls that the Civil War was an inevitable conflict (Bonner, 195).” Hence, these differences could only be addressed through war.

Read More
435 Words | 2 Pages

The most powerful people in the south, the KKK were the only ones that could have helped with the reconstruction of the south were not helping matters, that is why there was not and big developments. The south only wanted white people in power because they thought that the freedman were not equal and unfit to be part of any governments. The south wouldn’t even allow the freedmen to attend and public events. In conclusion even though the North had taken the soldiers out of the south and had given up on the freemen, the south has had a lot more problems reconstructing and making the freedman equal.

Read More
825 Words | 4 Pages

After the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and the rise of the Republican party, Southerners feared the tipping of the balance of political power against them; their need for self-determination parallel the colonists’ belief of rebelling against the oppressive government of Great Britain. However, the Civil War represented something more: the clash of the feudalistic, agrarian South with the industrialized, capitalistic North. These two powers differed socially, politically, and economically, and were especially conflicted over slavery. These two sections of the United States were divided against one another, and could not survive this way. Therefore, it is more accurate to state that though the Civil War resembled some aspects of the American Revolution, it was a clash between two forces who could not exist with one another in their current state, leading inevitably to conflict between the

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

1876 was an important year for America. It was the 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and America was moving forward. The united states was creating enough opportunity that all Americans and millions of immigrants could purse their hopes and dreams for happiness, just as Thomas Jefferson predicted 100 years earlier. But the great irony 1876 crushed the American dreams of millions of African-American and immigrants. Granting Hayes in office, he removed the last federal soldiers from the south, guaranteeing that all-white government will rise to power in the south.

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

To destroy the confederacy and make the south rejoin the union, extreme legal measures such as passing amendments needed to be taken by the government to affirm Union’s power over the south. The government also successfully being able to pass these amendments created a less discriminatory society and helped the south ease their beliefs on slavery, so that it could be easier for them to reunite with the

Read More
127 Words | 1 Pages

After finally winning the war, Lincoln 's way of punishing the south was only making them pledge amnesty to the U.S. and not letting higher ranking southerners participate in the government for a selected period of time. The South should not just be welcomed back into the country, they left and the proceeded to kill hundreds of thousands of our men when we tried to bring them back into the country they were born in. They committed treason and now our president just wants to let them off the hook? If they were willing to fight a war over fairness, aka state rights, then we should teat them as any other person who committed treason would be treated because that would be fair, they should understand their

Read More

More about Examples Of Southern Leaders Who Rebelled

Related Topics

Open Document