ipl-logo

Exclusionary Rule Pros And Cons

554 Words3 Pages

In an effort to enforce the legality of law enforcement conduct, the judiciary established the exclusionary rule to bar illegally or unconstitutionally obtained evidence in a criminal trial (Jurkowski, 2017). The rule's primary purpose is to deter law enforcement from violating laws and infringing on the constitutional rights of citizens. There are, however, several exceptions to this rule. One such exception is that of good faith, in which the officer involved did not knowingly or deliberately violate a law or an individual's constitutional right; this is often the result of an honest mistake or a clerical error. In the 1984 case United States v. Leon, the authorities executed a search warrant which was later found to be invalid due to insufficient …show more content…

On Christmas Eve in 1968, a young girl was reported missing after an event at the YMCA in Des Moines, Iowa (Harr et al., 2015). The culprit, Robert Williams, eventually turned himself into the police in Davenport, Iowa and was to be returned to the police in Des Moines. During the drive, despite not being allowed to interrogate, the officer made the "Christian Burial Speech" which resulted in Williams divulging the location of the young girl's body. A trial ensued, Brewer v. Williams, in which the Supreme Court overturned a conviction because Williams' Sixth Amendment right to counsel had been violated and his confession was inadmissible. During the retrial, Nix v. Williams, the court allowed the use of the child's body as evidence -even though the confession was not-because a search party would have inevitably discovered her without the confession (Forbes, 1987). References: Forbes, J. (1987). e Inevitable Discovery Exception, Primary Evidence, and the Emasculation of the Fourth Amendment,. Fordham Law Review, 55(6). Retrieved March 15, 2018, from https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol55/iss6/14/. Harr, J. S., Hess, K. M., Orthmann, C. M., & Kingsbury, J. (2015). Constitutional law and the Criminal Justice System. Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning. Jurkowski, S. (2017, June 22). Exclusionary Rule. Retrieved March 15, 2018, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/exclusionary_rule Justia. (2018). Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533 (1988). Retrieved March 15, 2018, from

Show More
Related

Evid R 403 Essay

1292 Words | 6 Pages

D. Ohio’s Evid. R. 403 Unlike its federal counterpart, the Ohio evidentiary rule 403 is separated into two sections: (a) mandatory exclusion and (b) discretionary exclusion. Even relevant evidence “is not admissible” when the probative value is substantially outweighed by evidence that (i) is unfairly prejudicial, (ii) confuses the issues, or (iii) misleads the jury. This clear language promulgated by the Ohio rule-makers establishes greater protections for defendants, and strips trial courts of their discretion in certain evidentiary matters.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

285 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule can make evidence inadmissible in the court of law if that evidence was illegally obtained by a police officer. This protects an individual from unlawful searches and serves as an effective deterrent for police misconduct. One could argue that a mistake on the officer’s behalf should not result in the release of a criminal. This assertion would be reasonable if these fourth amendment violations committed by police officers were honest mistakes. Unfortunately, some illegal evidence is found because of deliberate misconduct by the police.

Read More

Explain The Four Exceptions To The Exclusionary Rule

110 Words | 1 Pages

The exclusionary rule explain that collected evidence must not be a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights or else it could be inadmissible in court. The four exceptions to the Exclusionary rule are the Good-Faith exception, the Plain-View Doctrine, Clerical Errors Doctrine, and the Emergency Searches of Property. The exceptions are used to protect officers if they do something in good faith or in emergency. However these exceptions are only used to protect the officers who acted in good faith. This exceptions cannot help officers if they acted with malicious intent.

Read More

US Supreme Court Of Law: The Exclusionary Rule

81 Words | 1 Pages

The exclusionary rule is “based on U.S. Supreme Court precedent, that incriminating information must be seized according to constitutional specifications of due process or it will not be allowed as evidence in a criminal trial.” This corresponds with the fourth amendment because it protects us from unreasonable search and seizure from police. So, if police would find something incriminating evidence during an unreasonable search and seizure, it would not go through in the court of law hence the word “Exclusionary rule.”

Read More

Exclusionary Rule In The Utah V. Strieff Case

1378 Words | 6 Pages

The exclusionary rule in the Fourth Amendment allows criminal defendants to be in suppression, considering contained evidence in the results of the investigation that violates the amendment itself. The

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

322 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule was designed to deter police misconduct, protecting citizens from illegal search and seizures. (Ferdico, Fradella, & Totten, 2015) This rule not only deters any possible police misconduct but it also establishes innocence of a citizen before guilt. Exclusionary rule provides a window to prove reasonable doubt in order to move on to the next step to search and seize a property, etc. This rule also stops false evidence to be admitted against an individual; because a chain of command must be followed to introduced reasonable and true evidence in a court of law.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Exclusionary Rule

1191 Words | 5 Pages

The exclusionary rule should be retained because the suppression in federal and state prosecutions of evidence seized by police in violation of the fourth amendment should be reconsidered (Falk, 2010). According to the Washington law review, the focus is more on the alternatives that can be put in place of the exclusionary rule. According to this article, the appropriateness of the rule as a means of enforcing admonitions has a pawned hundreds of law review articles. The Supreme Court on its part may decide to do away with the entire doctrine. This article looks at the alternatives or supplementary enforcement devices that have been proposed over the years.

Read More

Due Process Revolution: CRM 322 Law Of Criminal Procedure

1151 Words | 5 Pages

Ohio (1961) where the court decided that the 4th amendment exclusionary rule was applied to the individual states and thus overturned Wolf vs. Colorado (1949). It was made possible due to the clause of due process that was connected with the 14th amendment. • Another important Case of that era is Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), where lawyers were ordered by the court for defendants who were poor. In addition to it, the court prohibited prosecutors against using the evidence that was seized in illegitimate searches. • One other famous Case of that era is Miranda v. Arizona (1966), where, even the person who was blamed of crimes, enjoyed the constitutional rights that protected his privileges and police was induced to respect the rights of accused, and the court required a prior warning before arrest.

Read More

Arguments Against The Exclusionary Rule

493 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule is a lawful principle that the United States use, which expresses that the confirmation that was powerfully utilized by the police can 't be utilized in a criminal trial. The motivation behind why this is done it’s for the security of the established rights. In addition, the exclusionary rule states that in the Fifth Amendment no one "should be denied of life, freedom, or property without due procedure of law." The exclusionary rule additionally expresses that in the Fourth Amendment it is intended to shield residents from unlawful pursuits and seizures. It also applies to the infringement of the Sixth Amendment, which ensures the privilege to counsel.

Read More

Privileges And Presumptions: The Federal Rules Of Evidence

1392 Words | 6 Pages

Privileges, presumptions, and judicial notices seem to be misunderstood when dealing with court issues. There are many interpretations of these terms as they are defined within the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE). The common issues that come up are in reference to when certain privileges apply; when presumptions can be used in evidence; and how judicial notices apply, what their boundaries are, and what can or cannot be noticed. This paper will look at privileges, presumptions, and judicial notices and define them according to West’s Encyclopedia of American Law and according to the FRE. Arguments for and against each will also be made and it will be shown how they are applied through the FRE.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On The Fourth Amendment

427 Words | 2 Pages

Back in 1975, there was a major case called, Payton V. New York. Theodore Payton was suspected of murdering a gas station manager, they found evidence within his home that connected him with the crime. What caused the problem was the fact New York had a law that allowed unwarranted searches if the person was a suspect. Based off the oral argument presented by Oyez, the police said it didn't count as the evidence because it was in public view when entering the home. It had to be appealed before it was determined as unconstitutional.

Read More

Advantages Of The Exclusionary Rule

313 Words | 2 Pages

The exclusionary rule was made to protect people 's rights and ensure justice in court but there are exceptions. One exception to the exclusionary rule is inevitable discovery. The law of inevitable discovery states that even if evidence is obtained illegally, it can still be used against someone in court if the evidence was bound to be found one way or another. For example, if the police were searching for a fugitive and broke into someone 's house without a search warrant because they believed the criminal was inside the house, and find the criminal they can still arrest him because sooner or later they would of gotten a warrant to go inside the house they suspected him to be in. If the police have to go inside someone 's home to find an

Read More

Inadmissible Evidence: Case Study

1656 Words | 7 Pages

The primary rights the exclusionary rule works to protect are the Fourth and Fifth Amendments. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, while the Fifth Amendment protects citizens from self-incrimination (Gardner & Anderson, 2015). When it is determined that police officers or other government agents violated a defendant’s rights in order to collect evidence, the defense attorney can address this issue and possibly have the evidence deemed inadmissible. An extension of the exclusionary rule is the derivative evidence rule, which is also known as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. This doctrine extends inadmissibility of evidence that was gathered indirectly from police misconduct.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Exclusion Clauses

792 Words | 4 Pages

An exclusion clause will generally not cover a breach which occurs outside the 'four corners' of a contract, such as where a trader does something that was not authorized by the contract. The most common type of unfair terms are exclusion clauses whereby one party seeks to exclude their liability arising under the contract. Other examples of unfair terms include penalty clauses where a party specifies an amount payable on breach of contract which is out of proportion to the loss that the party would

Read More

Advantages And Disadvantages Of Exclusion Clause In A Contract

1270 Words | 6 Pages

An exclusion clause can be contained in the contract by three different methods: Signature when the plaintiff when the plaintiff adds his/her signature to a certification, which has a contractual effect, having inside an exclusion clause, without manual intervention, it will be a part of the contract, and he/she is legally obligated to follow by its conditions. Furthermore, it happens if he/she has not comprehended the certification and in spite of whether he recognizes it or not. Thus, the group in a legal dispute will not be pledged by the exclusion clause if he/she has been verbally portrayed inaccurately as to the outcome of the exclusion

Read More

More about Exclusionary Rule Pros And Cons

Open Document