ipl-logo

Explain Why Atomic Bombings Was Justified

399 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Nuclear weapons debate essay

On August 6, 1945, an American bomber dropped an atomic bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima. US president Harry Truman decided to end war in the Pacific using the Americans’ newest weapon of mass destruction. Three days later, a second bomber dropped another bomb on Nagasaki. Most of the casualties were innocent civilians caught in a global battle for power and supremacy. In modern society, many people are still debating whether of not the droppings of the atomic bombs on Japan at the end of WWII were justified. Some believe that the bombings were fair, while others believe it was morally wrong and inhumane. This thus leads me to discuss the controversial topic and explain why the bombings were not justified. The Bombings Were Inhumane
Show More
Related
301 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in document A, President Truman believed that it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives. By making the decision to employ atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, it successfully brought an end to World War II. Now, while these bombs did ultimately spare thousands of American lives, it did also put an end to about 200,000 lives as shown in document E. Document A stated that Admiral William Leahy, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, opposed using the bomb because it killed civilians indiscriminately. He believed that an economic blockade and conventional bombing would convince Japan to surrender. As an opposite end of the spectrum though Truman’s advisor, James Byrnes thought that the use of “the A-bombs would not only cause Japan to surrender, but also impress the Soviet Union, and hopefully stop its expansion” (Doc C).

Read More
719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More
882 Words | 4 Pages

This image shows how big of a threat and danger Japan is- it also shows how important it is to bring Japan down. The atomic bombs are justified because of Japan’s aggressions towards U.S. The United States’ use of atomic bombs on Japan is justifiable because it saved thousands of American lives; the Japanese were given fair warning, and their aggressions towards the U.S.

Read More
690 Words | 3 Pages

When the United States dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, it showed the world that it had a capability for destruction the likes of which had never been seen before. Less than one week after the bombings, Japan agreed to an unconditional surrender with the Allied Powers, officially ending the second World War. While these attacks helped to finally bring an end to the largest global conflict in history, they are understandably still the topic of debate over seventy years later. Even though there are many negatives associated with the bombings, they were ultimately necessary because Japan would not have surrendered otherwise, and the lives of countless soldiers and Japanese civilians were spared because of the attacks.

Read More
676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Truman suggested that the United States warn Japan that, if they didn’t surrender, the bomb would be dropped. Japan refused to Surrender. On August 6, 1945, the bomb exploded over Hiroshima, Japan. On August 10 Japan sued for

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

On August 6, 1945 the United States dropped an Atomic bomb called the Little Boy on Hiroshima in Japan. A few days later the united states dropped another atomic bomb called the Fat man on the city of Nagasaki. The dropping of an atomic bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki ended the wars quickly, as Japan saw the devastating effects it had on their people and country. The decision to drop the bomb was a very hard one to agree on but changed lives for others. There are many pros and cons of the atomic bombs.

Read More
852 Words | 4 Pages

In the twentieth century, the United States dropped two atomic bombs, which were the most powerful weapons at that time, on Japan. It happened on August 6 and August 9, 1945. The atomic bombs killed 226,000 Japanese and ended the war. However, America should not have dropped the atomic bombs for two reasons. First, it was not necessary to drop the bomb to win the war militarily or to get the Japanese to surrender.

Read More
1838 Words | 8 Pages

The atomic bomb made this justified because this made the long lasting war end and people knew they were going to survive and see their loved ones again. Soldiers have been exhausted physically and mentally thought the war and

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis statement: Though many speculate that the act of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) while not doing so on Europe (Germany and Italy) was racially motivated, racism played little to no role in these bombings. The United States of America and her allies were willing to end World War II at any cost, had the atomic bombs been available they would have been deployed in Europe. In the 1940’s there is no doubt that the United States of America was engulfed by mass anti-Japanese hysteria which inevitably bled over into America’s foreign policy. During this period Japanese people living in both Japan and the United States of America were seen as less that human.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

It has been debated whether or not the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were justified ever since they were dropped. Some people think that the bombings were immoral and unnecessary, but it's important to think about why they were made. President Truman's approval of the bombs would result in the survival of American and Japanese lives and Japan's surrender.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Vincent Wang 808 3/22/23 What is an Atomic bomb? An atomic bomb is a weapon with great explosive power that results from the sudden release of energy upon the splitting, or fission, of the nuclei of a heavy element such as plutonium or uranium, it was used on Japan during Hiroshima and many people think it was a war crime, do you agree that it unjustified or justified? I say that America was justified in using the Atomic Bombs on Japan. I think America using the Atomic bomb was justified, because first off the Japanese people wouldn’t stop fighting back until they were left with no choice, it showed that the Japanese had demonstrated , fighting to almost the last man on Pacific islands, committing mass suicide on Saipan and unleashing

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and

Read More
1118 Words | 5 Pages

August 6th of 1945 was the day that President Harry S.Truman decided to end the war for good when he ordered the dropping of the first atomic bomb, named “Little Boy”, on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Two days later, President Truman ordered a second dropping of an atomic bomb named “Fat Man” on the city of Nagasaki because Japan did not surrender after the bombing of Hiroshima. The casualties of these atomic bombs were severe with over an estimated 100,000 people dead (“The Atomic Bomb”). The dropping of the bomb should have never happened because it was highly unnecessary, due to the fact that Japan were practically defeated already. According to William D. Leahy, the Chief of Staff to President Franklin Roosevelt and President Harry Truman and a very close aide to both presidents believed that the surrendering of Japan could be arranged without the use of an atomic bomb and invasions on their mainland.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

President Harry Truman gave an executive order in 1945 to drop to atomic bombs in popular downtown cities in Japan. With the guidance of many scientists and political leaders President Truman made the extremely tough decision to drop the bombs. After listening to arguments from both sides President Truman came to the conclusion that dropping bombs would be the best thing to do for this war. It would also show that the United States had an extreme military power. Many American politicians were for the idea of dropping the bomb, because they believed that it was the only way to end the war and get Japan to surrender.

Read More

More about Explain Why Atomic Bombings Was Justified

Open Document