Explain Why Christians Should Not Be Allowed To Bear The Sword Argumentative Essay

705 Words3 Pages

Say a thief broke into your house and he killed your children, and the only thing left for you to do to protect your wife is to take that gun or sword off the wall and do what needs to be done? What would you do in this situation, let him just kill you and your wife, or defend yourself? So the big question here is, do you think Christians should be allowed bear the sword for the right reason? With a lot of research and debates, I have come to the belief that Christians should be allowed to bear the sword. The first reason why I think Christians should bear the sword is because everyone should be allowed to defend themselves if there being persecuted or threatened. Another point on why Christians should be allowed to use violence is because …show more content…

They say that it was wrong for Christians to fight in the crusades and that the crusades were bad, but we are not talking about the crusades here, we are talking about Christians being able to bear the sword to defend themselves. According to Dictionary.com, Just war means “a war that is deemed to be morally or theologically justifiable.” Another point people use to support their side is the verse in the Bible that says “thou shall not kill”. Well when they say this verses, there are not speaking the full truth cause if you knew what the verse actually said, it says “thou shall not murder”. That verse makes sense now if it says thou shall not murder, because killing and murdering are way two very different things. Killing could be like you killing an animal for food, or you are killing it at something! Even the verse with murder itself in it does not support their side or our side. Because the Christians were not murdering, they were defending and …show more content…

John 2: 15 states “So he made a whip out of cords, and drove all from the temple courts, both sheep and cattle; he scattered the coins of the money changers and overturned their tables.” This verse is saying that he made a whip and chased money counters out of the temple. Meaning, all he was doing was defending the temple and Christianity. Romans 13: 4-5 says “for it is a minister of God to you for good. But if you do what is evil, be afraid; for it does not bear the sword for nothing; for it is a minister of God, an avenger who brings wrath on the one who practices evil. Therefore it is necessary to be in subjection, not only because of wrath, but also for conscience’ sake.” Now, this verse is a great example of what I am trying to say here, if you go to war, you go to war for the right reasons. Those reason are in the name of Jesus Christ, that’s exactly what the first, second, and third crusade was doing. In conclusion Christians should be allowed to bear the sword in certain events. Because, Jesus used violence in the Bible a couple times, and so did the Crusades. Therefor I do not find anything wrong at all with Christians bearing the sword for the right reason. That reason is in the name of God, for they are defending