Should students be limited to what they can and can not eat at school? The principle should not change the school lunch menu because, students should be allowed to choose what they want to eat, some students may not eat at all because they do not like anything the cafeteria has to offer, and this limits what the students can eat. Students should be allowed to choose what type of food they eat. Not every students wants to eat only healthy food, they are going to at least want some sort of snack. The menu should not be completely changed, but should have healthier options added. If the students want to eat healthy, then that should be their choice. Students are already forced to come to school, why force them to eat something they do not …show more content…
It is healthier for a student to eat something, rather than nothing at all. Students not eating would cause more problems with the new lunch menu. Changing the lunch menu to be healthier, limits the students to what they can and can not have. Having only healthy food to choose from does not give much variety to what a student can have. The students should have both healthy and unhealthy items to choose from. Most students would prefer having the option of whether or not they want to eat healthy. Every student wants different things and having only one type of food would be a bad thing. Opponents may argue that more kids should be eating healthier, but kids should not be forced to eat something they do not want. However, the opponents would be right about students and how they should be eating healthier, it is something the students decide. Having the option to eat healthy or not should be a choice for the students. If the menu is completely changed, it would probably upset most of the students. The school lunch menu should not be completely changed because, it limits the options for students, may cause some students to not eat at all, and healthy eating should be a choice. It would simply be a much better idea to add healthy options to the menu as well as