Exposure And Poppies Comparison

Power of Nature Comparison

Zeeshan Zeeshan
Write a conparitive essay on how the power of nature is presented in the poem's 'exposure' and 'Poppies'

The poems "Exposure" by Wilfred Owen and "Poppies" by Jane Weir both explore the theme of the power of nature. In "Exposure," Owen portrays nature as a merciless force that is indifferent to the plight of soldiers in the First World War. In contrast, Weir's "Poppies" presents nature as a source of comfort and solace in the face of personal loss.

In "Exposure," Owen uses harsh imagery to depict the brutal conditions that soldiers faced during the winter of 1917. He personifies nature as an enemy that is actively seeking to harm the soldiers. For example, the opening lines of the poem read, "Our

Priestley's play "An Inspector Calls" is a complex one, and opinions differ on whether or not he is a hypocrite. Some argue that he is inconsistent in his behavior and actions, while others believe that his actions are justified by his overarching mission to expose the hypocrisy of the Birling family. In this essay, we will explore the evidence for and against the idea that Inspector Goole is a hypocrite.

On the one hand, there are several instances in the play where Inspector Goole's actions could be seen as hypocritical. For example, he claims to be investigating the death of Eva Smith, but his methods are unorthodox and arguably unethical. He does not reveal his identity or explain his authority, and he bullies and manipulates the Birlings into confessing to their wrongdoing. Furthermore, he seems to have preconceived notions about the family and their guilt, which undermines the impartiality of his

For instance, he criticizes the family for their selfishness and disregard for the less fortunate, but he himself seems to have a single-minded focus on achieving justice for Eva Smith, regardless of the consequences for the Birlings. He also seems to take pleasure in his power over the family, which could be seen as hypocritical given his condemnation of their abuse of power.

On the other hand, there are several arguments against the idea that Inspector Goole is a hypocrite. Firstly, it could be argued that his unorthodox methods are justified by the urgency of his mission. He knows that time is running out to prevent Eva Smith's death, and he feels that he needs to use every means at his disposal to get the truth out of the Birlings. Furthermore, his methods are effective in exposing the family's wrongdoing and making them confront their moral failings.

Additionally, it could be argued that Inspector Goole is not a hypocrite because he is consistent in his message. He believes that the Birlings are responsible for Eva Smith's death, and he is relentless in his pursuit of justice for her. He is not afraid to call out the family's hypocrisy and make them face the consequences of their actions. Furthermore, he represents a voice of conscience and morality in a society that is often corrupt and