ipl-logo

Analysis Of Valerius Maximus 'Facta Memorabilia'

864 Words4 Pages

The following report is on an article from American Journal of Philology (ISSN 0002-9475, 2013, Volume 134, Issue 1, pp. 67 – 82) by Tara Welch from University of Kansas: Was Valerius Maximus a Hack? Abstract: Valerius Maximus’ “Facta et dicta memorabilia” blends elements of Roman declamation and historiography. Scrutiny of this text’s intertextual practices sheds light on the relationship it creates between its contents and its readers. Whereas declamation’s textual re-use aims to draw attention to the declaimer’s skill at adapting material, and historiographers invoke prior texts to borrow the earlier author’s authority, Valerius Maximus includes prior texts in ways that obscure both his own skill and his source’s authority. The attention …show more content…

She suspects then Valerius of using allusion: “That would fall under Genette’s intertextual subcategory, “allusion,” engagement with another text that needs to be recognized by the reader in order for a text to have its full meaning.”(Welch 2013) Bloomer offered one of the explanations for the question “Why did Valerius have to use allusion for a well-known fact?” Bloomer claims that Valerius relied on the structure of the paragraph offered by Cicero. In addition, Valerius utilizes diction and writing style of Livy in some of his stories. The story under analysis, however, almost completely repeats Livy’s diction. That, according to Bloomer, who was quoted by Welch, was probably comfortable for Valerius to use some phrases from Livy. A conventional system would probably call this “borrowing” plagiarism, yet Welch uses another approach- she claims what Valerius did is “allusion”, not plagiarism. The reason for the use of Cicero’s words is simple- the words are very fit for describing what Valerius tried to tell. In addition, since Cicero is a well-known authority, Valerius felt it was not necessary to reference him. This is often used by various social scientists, who include words of other famous people in their works, altering them slightly. Seneca describes this type of allusion as palam mutuari: “openly obtaining loan words with the intention of paying them back (Suas. 3.3.7, and see Peirano’s article in this volume)” (Welch

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

“It's like everyone tells a story about themselves inside their own head. Always. All the time. That story makes you what you are. We build ourselves out of that story.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

These mythical individuals show characteristics that are both valued and those that could be seen as inferior. In Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline, Catiline, the antagonist of his own story, is described as having some of these characteristics and how he displays them changes others perspective on him. With each of these characteristics that a Roman would have seen as positive were painted in a negative light because Sallust tells the audience instances where Catiline used these gifts in harmful ways. In contrast Aeneas, in Virgil’s Aeneid, is described and assigned what are thought of as the same Roman attributes, but these are held a positive approach compared to Sallust’s description of Catiline. The first example of this can be seen in the fifth section Sallust tells the audience of Catiline’s noble upbringing and is described as intelligent, ambitious, and as a brilliant solider.

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, the issue noted above that we do not know the order of the Parallel Lives, makes interpretation difficult because we therefore can’t understand how Plutarch’s themes developed and interacted with each other throughout the entire series. This is an issue in Life of Marius because of how singularly negative Plutarch is about Marius, to the point where it has been noted as his most critical work on any character. Secondly, the genre of biography itself and its focus on character rather than fact, inherently suggests that Plutarch may exaggerate some events and omit others, in order to communicate his lessons on morality. For example, Plutarch is far more descriptive of political events in which Marius can be portrayed as immoral and ambitious. However, he says little on the political platform on which Marius ran for consulship, and downplays the political acumen Marius, as a novus homo, or even if he had been nobilis, must have had to gain consulship for 6 straight years.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

The first source that will be discussed in this essay is an extract from a book by Procopius, a prominent Byzantine scholar, entitled Secret History. Written circa 550 AD, the book itself heavily criticises the emperor Justinian and his wife Theodora, and its disparaging, subjective, and almost anecdotal tone is reflected in the source. The author of the book is of significance- not only was Procopius potentially the most well-known Byzantine historian, but he had previously written another book, History of the Wars, which was extremely complementary of Justinian and Theodora. This means that, because Secret History took such a vastly different tone, the authorship of the book has been brought into question, especially since it was published

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The purpose of Mark Antony’s speech is to convince the public that the killing of Caesar was unjust. In order to achieve the purpose Antony uses rhetorical questions, allusions, repetition, and parallelism. Antony effectively uses the rhetorical devices by putting forward the main issues and manipulating words to be more basis for the main argument through the rhetorical devices. Antony uses rhetorical questions to make the public question what they once knew. Antony asks the public “Did this Caesar seem ambitious?”

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses rhetorical devices such as paralipsis, rhetorical questions, and verbal irony in his speech to the plebeians in order to plot them against the conspirators. During his speech to the plebians, Antony uses paralipsis in order to kindle curiosity and interest in the audience. Antony mentions to the plebians that he had Caesar’s will with him but tells them, “Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how much Caesar loved you” (3.2.152-153). By drawing attention to Caesar’s will, something Antony desperately wants to show the plebeians, but then dismissing the idea of reading it, Antony uses a type of verbal irony called paralipsis. Antony is aware that the contents

Read More
1631 Words | 7 Pages

The concept of exemplarity was used extensively throughout Roman literature as a tool to give guidance and enforce authority. By providing an ethical framework of societal precedents, exempla served to govern all facets of Roman public life. The system of exemplarity had an inherent power in Roman society, allowing it to be exploited for personal gain by rulers such as Augustus. Through his monumental literary biography, Res Gestae Divi Augusti, Augustus manipulated exemplarity in order to translate his coercive power into benevolent authority over the people of Rome.

Read More
982 Words | 4 Pages

Sections 1.21 through 1.29 of Lucian’s True Histories depict the sociology of the Moonmen and the narrator and his crew’s return the earth. One discourse particle used with relative frequency in these sections is γάρ. The particle’s connection to conveying information either through its ability to clarify a cause or relay additional information, explains its many occurrences in these sections. In the sections 1.21-1.29, Lucian generally uses the particle γάρ to mark the cause of a fact which he has previously stated. As is common for this use of γάρ, he begins by relating a piece of information and then expanding on its cause (Denniston, 58.)

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

Well true it may be good in some amounts but the amount of repetition Brutus uses is way over the top. He reminds the crowd of how nobel he is how honorable he is, how much valor he has, and how much he loves Rome. But he says it was to much, he uses it so much that it make some audicance feel like they are being dumbed or their intelligence is being questioned. It is good to use repetition to stick but Brutus uses way to much that it makes the audience feel dumb and they might feel like they are being stepped on, the audience might even zone off and not pay attention that is why it is important to use rhetorical questions in moderation. Antony however only uses just enough to hook and engage the audience and spreads out what he has to stay so it is easy

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

At the same time, Antony uses rhetoric to persuade the Romans. While Antony is questioning the citizens why they do not love Caesar anymore, he uses pathos. He asks, “what cause withholds you then, to mourn

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Tragedy of Julius Caesar- Rhetorical Analysis In the novel, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare, after Brutus brutally executes Caesar in Act 3 Scene 2, Antony is allowed to give a speech to the people of Rome whom have seen witnessed this fatal tragedy in Scene 3. Antony uses anaphora, connotative diction and details throughout his speech to persuade the Romans to change their perspective of Caesar and Brutus. The way Antony speaks about both Caesar & Brutus are a dispute of what he is actually trying to announce to the Romans. At the end of his speech, Antony hopes to reach the Romans emotionally (pathos) by enraging them against Brutus’s false statements against Caesar.

Read More
381 Words | 2 Pages

This justifies the use of rhetorical questions as an acceptable, rational persuasion technique. Immediately after this rhetorical question, Cassius uses compare and contrast by comparing Brutus to Caesar by saying, “Write them together, yours is as fair a name; / Sound them, it doth become the mouth as well” (1.2.48-51). By claiming that Brutus and Caesar both have “fair” names and that the names both “sound” equally honorable, Cassius highlights a clear comparison between Brutus and Caesar. The similarities between the two are emphasized by Cassius in order to persuade Brutus that he is equally as important as Caesar, and should not allow Caesar to establish his own tyrannical state.

Read More
620 Words | 3 Pages

Analysis Of Julius Caesar Funeral Death Speeches Julius Caesar was like a god to his people because he was the leader in Rome, and he influenced numerous individuals. People were shocked when Caesar was murdered by Bursitis because they lost their hero. During Caesar’s funeral, as described in Shakespeare’s play Julius Caesar , there are two speeches given by Brutus and Anthony. Some of the rhetorical terms that are used in the death speeches are antithesis, metaphor, chiasmus, and alliteration which will be explained in the body of this essay.

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

Sydney Stone Mrs. Paul English 10A 16 October 2017 Rhetorical Analysis Essay William Shakespeare, a very famous writer, tells the story of Julius Caesar. In his play, Marc Antony delivers a powerful speech that uses many different rhetorical devices, appeals, and different styles of writing. Some of these include repetition, rhetorical questions, pathos, logos, ethos, and diction. These help enhance Marc Antony’s speech by persuading the audience towards considering that Caesar was a good man.

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

This book isn’t limited to only events that could be closer to facts then fiction, it also encompasses culture, ideas, and more. Throughout this essay, pieces of the book will be analyzed to see if they are closer to fact than fiction or fiction than fact, thus the ability to conclude if Pompeii is closer to fact or fiction or a mix of both will be presented. The aquarius

Read More

More about Analysis Of Valerius Maximus 'Facta Memorabilia'

Related Topics

Open Document