ipl-logo

Failures Of The Constitution Pros And Cons

1540 Words7 Pages

Elijah Martinez
Comparative Government 103
Mr. John Vento
March 21, 2017
The Failures of the U.S. Constitution
Indeed, more than two centuries of experience demonstrates that... the Framers Were Wrong, they will change the constitution. Even if the Framers did not intend their constitution to abolish slavery, when later generations concluded that slavery could no longer be tolerated and must be abolished, they changed the constitution to conform with their belief.
-Rober Dahl, How Democratic is the American Constitution?

The Constitution is the most sacred document the United States has; it profoundly affects how we run our government and how we view our democracy. If the people believe the government is not running well and the issue …show more content…

This was because of the electoral college- Clinton won the popular vote because of the vast number of residents living in California who overwhelmingly voted for her. However, the electoral college, as expressed in the constitution, would have it that citizens of smaller states hold greater power in voting than do citizens of larger states. In an article published by the Washington Post, it’s noted “...each individual Wyoming vote weighs 3.6 times more than an individual Californian’s vote... if you average the 10 most populous states... to those of the 10 least populous states, you get a ratio of 1 to 2.5.” This, as the article argues, distorts the true views of the people, as the smaller states citizens’ votes will have greater value than an American at the unfortunate end. This does not reflect and does not incorporate democratic elements crucial to the overall average voter, as his or her vote may just count for less. Under the constitution, to propose an amendment, there is a requirement of two-third votes by the House of Representatives and Senators. After this, there is the ratification by the legislatures. Considering all of this, it would seem highly unlikely that the requested amount of states needed to ratify such an amendment would be inclined to place themselves in an inferior circumstance. This amendment would …show more content…

On one hand, judicial review is related to judicial legislation. This is illustrated by the judiciary having not only the authority to interpret the constitution, but the ability to add laws when interpreting and deciding cases brought before them. The judiciary oversteps its jurisdiction, democratically speaking, because if is not of an elected body. It holds the power to consider laws enacted by elected officials of Congress and the President unconstitutional, while they are not in direct election by the people and are not seen as legitimate. As Robert Dahl has stated, “...contradiction remains between imbuing an unelected body... with the power to make policy decisions that affect the lives and welfare of millions of Americans.” The response to this issue would be implementing a judicial selection system like assisted appointment which is also known as Merit Selection and the Missouri Plan. This method holds a commission to review the qualification of the nominated judges and then sends the approved judges to the governor (President) who then selects one. The judge is to serve one term (a decade-long term) and then be subjected to a retention referendum. This would solve the of the judicial review not being democratic. In fact, it would be even more democratic as it would allow the people to decide whether or not they would want to keep the judge. The judges typically serve 26 years, so will this is a

Show More
Related

Summary Of The Buffalo Creek Disaster By Gerald M. Stern

1521 Words | 7 Pages

Our legal system allows judges to make important decisions on their own, which is a huge responsibility, and if it falls into the wrong hands, there could be severe

Read More

Examples Of It's Shield Against Tyranny Dbq

1040 Words | 5 Pages

The Constitution: It’s Shield Against Tyranny “The United States of America”, or better yet what individuals know and cherish as the land of the free and home of the brave. Going all the way back to the colonial period of the 17th century to now, one can’t help but to recognize the documents that implemented this country’s first sense of structure. Beginning with the Articles of Confederation, which was the country’s initial constitution, posed serious weaknesses, like the inability to enforce laws or the total lack of an official court system. After a prolonged debate, the first Continental Congress met in Philadelphia to draft together a new written U.S. Constitution, which would not only replace the Articles of Confederation and fix all

Read More

Compare And Contrast 1989 Texas Vs Eichman

1518 Words | 7 Pages

To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. This lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of the Courts is bestowed within the discussion between judicial activism and judicial restraint. In general, these two philosophies represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Consequently, the Court’s decision could be framed in terms of activism or restraint by either changing or upholding public policy.

Read More

Merit Plan Pros And Cons

694 Words | 3 Pages

This especially true for cases where citizens have elected the most moneyed judge rather than the most qualified

Read More

How Did The Articles Of Confederation Flawed Form Of Government

1910 Words | 8 Pages

THE CONSTITUTION: A NECESSITY AND AN IMPROVEMENT Jaideep Singh History 7: Research Paper 2 October 25, 2017 THE CONSTITUTION Americans, as a whole, like to pride over our government. The United States possesses one of the most complex and efficient form of government in the world.

Read More

Amending The Constitution Pros And Cons

711 Words | 3 Pages

Article Five of the United States Constitution clearly spells out ways to amend the document as so desired by Congress or the States. Regarding this specific topic, there have been recent debates over whether there should be a Constitutional Convention comprised of state legislatures developed for the sole purpose of bypassing congress in amending the Constitution. Before I watched the debate, I decided against this notion as I personally do not have any knowledge, presently, of how to amend the constitution. Therefore, there should not be a convention to do just that. Although the opposing side brought some real issues to light regarding the ideas of “Draining the Swamp”, using “True Democracy” for one person equals one vote/one state equals one vote, and stating that re-electing new congressional officials hasn’t changed anything either.

Read More

How Does The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny

840 Words | 4 Pages

This states that even though that bigger states have more representatives, it puts the limit that the number of representatives for each state by ensuring that one state doesn’t exceed one for every thirty thousand people. This prevents tyranny in the House of Representatives. In Article 1, Section 3 it states, “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two senators from each state, chosen by the legislatures thereof for six years; and each senator shall have one vote.” (Source: Constitution of the United States of America, 1787.) This article means that every state has two senators so it doesn’t matter how big a population of a state is.

Read More

Should Electoral College Be Abolished Dbq Essay

1953 Words | 8 Pages

“...the single representative from Wyoming, representing 500,000 voters, would have as much say as the 55 representatives from California, who represent 35 million voters” (Document F). States with less population have more say than a state with a larger population. California’s population is 70 times larger than the state of Wyoming’s. A larger population should have more say. the idea should not be that smaller states should have more representation because they are smaller; it should be that a state with larger population should have more representation.

Read More

Supreme Court Cases: Baker V. Carr

747 Words | 3 Pages

In the United States, the Supreme Court spends the majority of its time on things that are not appointed to them by the Constitution. An example of this would be when the constitutionality of a law is questioned or challenged. The process of Judicial Review is when the Supreme Court sorts out what they think is constitutional and not constitutional. One Supreme Court case that questioned a law’s constitutionality is Baker v. Carr in 1962. Charles Baker, resident of Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against the secretary of state, Joe Carr.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of Keeping The Electoral College

931 Words | 4 Pages

One of the United States’ fundamental beliefs is the idea that fair taxation with equal representation. Author of, “5 Advantages and Disadvantages of Electoral College”, Louise Gaille, elaborates, “In national representation, each state and population district receives equal representation, in either the house or the senate, and that allows individual voters to still have a say in what happens” (Gaille). The Electoral College was built on compromises the Founding Fathers made to ensure the equal ability for everyone to impact the decisions made in the country. Without national representation, states with smaller populations won’t have their votes as considered as the votes from larger states. For example, although Wyoming makes up about .18% of the population, they still control .56% of all electoral votes.

Read More

Dred Scott Vs Sandford

1065 Words | 5 Pages

Judicial review has been perceived as inconsistent with the significance that democracies properly attach political participation and to equality. Judges under the rule of law are seen as a threat to the courts under a democratic ruling. Judges who conform to the criminal and civil justice in a democratic ruling obtain to the traditional values in moderate courts. The citizens who live under a democratic ruling develop an expectation of judicial power which is expected to be exercised independently. Judges are likely to be a danger to public society since they disregard to speak to cases of a majority rule under racial discrimination.

Read More

Partisan Elections For Judges Essay

504 Words | 3 Pages

Judges are removed only by failure to be reelected, by the Supreme Court due to incompetence, official misconduct, or negligence, or by impeachment by the House. The Texas judicial system is complicated and confusing. Many Americans don’t understand the US Supreme Court, how then will they understand the smaller, state and local judicial system. A voter in Texas is asked to vote for many different candidates running from anything from

Read More

Electoral College Dbq Analysis

1026 Words | 5 Pages

At first glance this doesn’t seem like a bad thing, everyone gets an equal say, right? Wrong! This means that Wyoming which has a population of about 500,000 voters will have an the exact same say in presidency as California which has a population of 35 million voters. Essentially, highly populated states will find that their individual votes count proportionality less.

Read More

Persuasive Essay On The Electoral College

945 Words | 4 Pages

With each electors being treated the same, this will mean that Wyoming and other smaller states has more voting power and therefore, a greater impact in the presidential

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

This may cause a judge to render a decision based on obligation instead of holding true to their beliefs. This pressure is not easily felt as intensely by appointed judges, especially those with lengthy terms. In considering the equity of the pros and cons it is my opinion that the existing system in place works best. Every system is flawed.

Read More

More about Failures Of The Constitution Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document