ipl-logo

Supreme Court Cases: Baker V. Carr

747 Words3 Pages

In the United States, the Supreme Court spends the majority of its time on things that are not appointed to them by the Constitution. An example of this would be when the constitutionality of a law is questioned or challenged. The process of Judicial Review is when the Supreme Court sorts out what they think is constitutional and not constitutional. One Supreme Court case that questioned a law’s constitutionality is Baker v. Carr in 1962. Charles Baker, resident of Tennessee, filed a lawsuit against the secretary of state, Joe Carr. He stated that the Tennessee legislative districts had not been redrawn since 1901. The Supreme Court said that only federal courts have the authority to determine the constitutionality of the voting districts for …show more content…

This allows states to determine jurisdictional boundaries accurately. "Sec. 6. Apportionment of senators.—The number of Senators shall, at the several periods of making the enumeration, be apportioned among the several counties or districts according to the number of qualified electors in each, and shall not exceed one-third the number of representatives. In apportioning the Senators among the different counties, the fraction that may be lost by any county or counties, in the apportionment of members to the House of Representatives, shall be made up to such county or counties in the Senate, as near as may be practicable. When a district is composed of two or more counties, they shall be adjoining; and no county shall be divided in forming a district." ("Baker v. Carr, 369 US 186 - Supreme Court 1962,") The Supreme Court had a 6-2 ruling in their final decision on the case, in favor of …show more content…

In the United States Constitution, the Fourteenth Amendment does not allow the government to interfere with an individual’s right to pursue happiness. The Federal Government has the ability to rule over laws in a situation where advantages are unfair with the creation of a law. Rights were expanded to ensure that equal legal process is respected within the United States. The decision the Supreme Court came to required redistricting of the counties in Tennessee every 10 years when the census is

Open Document