ipl-logo

Fatme Dakroub Summary

571 Words3 Pages

In this article, it talks about the violation of the first amendment rights. The first amendment gives U.S. citizens the right to freedom of speech and press, forming assemblies, peacefully petitioning, and specifically in this article, freedom of religion. In mid May, Fatme Dakroub was pulled over and put under arrest for a supposedly unpaid traffic ticket having her take off her hijab. She decided to file a lawsuit against Ocean County Sheriff Department for allegedly violating her rights of the first amendment. This article sums up the story of Fatme Dakroub and why she is filing a lawsuit against the Ocean County Sheriff Department. It began when she was pulled over and arrested for supposedly not paying a traffic ticket. After arriving at the jail, she was forced to remove her hijab, a religious head covering. Before removing her hijab however she had requested for a female officer to oversee this arrangement, but was denied the request by the three male officers in the room by saying that, “it was not an option”. She then was forced to take off her hijab in front of the three male officers against her will. …show more content…

For Dakroub, having her hijab off and showing her hair, neck, and ears to the male police officers was an infraction to her religious beliefs and faith. Not only was she forced to take off her hijab, but she was not allowed any other choice besides taking off her hijab. She was not given the option to have her hijab patted down, which is completely valid and when she asked for a female officer to oversee the arrangement she was denied the request. When Dakroub was forced to stay in a holding cell, she was not allowed the comfort of having her hijab back. In fact, without her hijab on she had begun to feel humiliated and male inmates began hitting on her making her feel even more

Show More
Related
140 Words | 1 Pages

1. The article that I found is about how the Federal Government was denied the ability to ban women from wearing their niquabs during a citizenship ceremony. The ban on niquabs was first brought to light when a Muslim woman from Pakistan named Zunera Ishaq tried to get Canadian citizenship, but she was unable to do so due to her unwillingness to remove her niquab. In the federal court ruling between the dispute amidst Zunera Ishaq and the government, Judge Keith Boswell stated that denying Zunera Ishaq her right to wear a niquab during her Canadian citizenship ceremony violates her freedom of religion. It was ruled that Zunera Ishaq was allowed to complete the ceremony while wearing her niquab.

Read More
713 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment rights of Alex were violated because the school went against his belief of religion and did not allow him to express it. The school administrator tampered with Alex’s First Amendment rights. Quoting from the Bill of Rights, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or

Read More
209 Words | 1 Pages

Our First Amendment within the United States Constitution protects our freedoms of speech, press, and assembly, which are umbrella terms for our right to protest, among others. We, as american citizens, have the right to protest whatever we choose,whether it be a television program, a new law that has been passed, or in the Snyder v. Phelps case, deceased veteran funerals. Marine Lance Cpl. Matthew Snyder’s family filed a lawsuit against the Phelps family and their followers, otherwise known as the Westboro Baptist Church, who the Snyder 's felt intentionally inflicted emotional distress whilst picketing Matthew Snyder’s funeral. The United States Supreme Court determined that speech in a public space, cannot be liable for any emotional distress,

Read More
103 Words | 1 Pages

People have the tendency to take the First Amendment for granted, but some tend to use it to their favor. Stanley Fish presents his main argument about how people misuse this amendment for all their conflicts involving from racial issues to current political affairs in his article, Free-Speech Follies. His article involves those who misinterpret the First Amendment as their own works or constantly use it as an excuse to express their attitudes and desires about a certain subject matter. He expresses his personal opinions against those who consistently use the First Amendment as a weapon to defend themselves from harm of criticism.

Read More
237 Words | 1 Pages

Yvonne Allen does not have any right to wear her headscarf in her licence photo due to the security issues it would create. She believes that her rights are being infringed upon, but doesn't realize that a licence is a privilege not a right. It is hard to argue this fact when it says literally nowhere in any law or precedent that any U.S. citizen has any right to a licence. Allen only uses two defenses one of which is how her faith is tested “in a way that was humiliating and demeaning”(8), a judge will never consider this as a good defense on why she should get her licence, because it is based on emotions not law. Her other defense was how Muslim women were allowed to wear their own headscarves in their driver's license photos, but this seems

Read More
1803 Words | 8 Pages

Abercrombie denied hiring her thinking she was muslim and that’s why she wore a hijab. One of reasons that this case was taken to court was to see if Abercrombie discriminated Samantha for wearing a headscarf, which violates the 14th amendmendment. Another big conflict that made this case be taken to court was that Abercrombie did not hire her because they thought she was muslim and that is why she wore a hijab, which violates the Title VII of the Civil Right Act Of 1964. What the Court wanted out of this case was to make sure that Abercrombie was not violating these rights from employees. The issue that was presented

Read More
167 Words | 1 Pages

The first Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights in the Constitution that protects the citizens freedom of expression. According to Source 1, the rights rights protected by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution are freedom of speech, religion, Press, assembly and petition. However, there have been times when the First Amendment has been restricted. In source 4, the Supreme Court case in Des Moines, lowa Mary Beth Tinker,13, her older brother and a friend wore black armbands white peace sings to their schools from of protest against the U.S. involvement in the Vietnam war school officials told to the students to remove their armbands, they refused and were suspended Student sued the school district. This shows that.

Read More
894 Words | 4 Pages

In 1939, Reza Shah’s unveiling declaration sparked a worldwide debate as to what the veil actually symbolizes. Ever since the beginning of Islam, women throughout the Islamic world have had to adopt the hijab as part of their cultural and religious attire due to various interpretations of the Islamic dress code. In addition, the Koran emphasizes purity in the name of Islam by asking both men and women to be modest when it comes to the way they dress. Furthermore, in his efforts to modernize Iran, Reza Shah failed to satisfy the needs of his people, as he gave women no say in what they could and could not wear in public. This eventually resulted in the division of Iranian women, as there were those who favored the Islamic tradition, and those who supported the regime and its adoption of Western values.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

The freedom of religion is stark contrast to that of the government workings and legal affairs, but is still an important factor of canadian life. Religion is a belief system meant to be untouched by law, as long as they remain a peaceful congregation, and though time and time again does hate groups try to level on their rights, the judicial courts of Canada have continued to terminate such issues. The most recent and well known case winning would be of the niqab controversy. Zunera Ishaq, a Pakistani immigrant, had won against the conservative government in two levels of court over the right to wear her niqab at her citizenship oath, before the new Liberal government dropped the former 's appeal to the Supreme Court. The reasoning behind her continued victory was because the courts had viewed the case as a violation to her religious freedom, as the niqab relates to her muslim faith.

Read More
501 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.

Read More
2760 Words | 12 Pages

At a time when great progress has been made regarding democracy and public participation, it is rather unfortunate that there are retrogressive laws that are allowed to flourish. The above discussion has clearly demonstrated that the level of conflict between the Sharia Law and the U.S Constitution is so high that the two sources of law can never be compatible at any given time. The paper has identified many different areas where the two documents conflict and concludes that the most notable ones are freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to dissent, right to a public trial, right to representation

Read More
500 Words | 2 Pages

All freedoms should have a restriction somewhere, and this limitation should happen when one breaks a law for the purpose of a religion. Americans should have their freedoms, but safety is even more important. Harming others for the purpose of a religion is a threat to society, and can bring down the nation. It is not fair for the purpose of people to break the law just because of a religious belief, while other people get punished for breaking the law. The first amendment is a controversial topic that still gets debated today.

Read More
2060 Words | 9 Pages

Hello Prof. Billingsley, Classmates and readers of this post. It is pleasure for me to write a short review concerning the story of Samir and thereby mingling his experience to that of mine. After this week’s readings and studies, I would have immediately loved to learn more about him and to ask him some more questions but unfortunately the provided link about “To learn more about Samir” is not functional.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Why teens hurry to get married nowadays? Young generation today stream into marriage without understanding what they are getting into. Marriage is a lifetime responsibility which the teenagers don 't take seriously. Today 's teenagers don 't believe in the term of trust, faith and love.

Read More
1778 Words | 8 Pages

In her case, she cited the fact that the free religion is protected by the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from creating a church an official church and also allows people to worship or not worship as they want. In this case, this right helped Deborah to sue her school successfully. The second right is the freedom of speech and of the press. According to USCIS (n. d.) the freedom of speech and of the press “includes freedom of speech, freedom to peaceably assemble, and the freedom to petition the government for a redress of grievances”. Americans are allowed to share their opinions and thoughts as long as they do not disrupt others’ freedom to express themselves as well.

Read More

More about Fatme Dakroub Summary

Related Topics

Open Document