ipl-logo

Leadership Performance Vs. Follower's Satisfaction

790 Words4 Pages

Leader’s Performance vs. Follower’s Satisfaction 15. Throughout the career Alexander was well respected by his superiors, his peers and his subordinates. His popularity is also depicted throughout this analytical paper and it is established through the comment of Supreme Allied Commander Eisenhower and senior British General Montgomery. Due to outstanding performance in World War-I and World War-II, Alexander received a number of awards and recognitions from home and abroad. His leadership is still a widely researched area for all levels of military officers all over the world. Some of the mentionable international recognitions of Field Marshal Harold Alexander are as follows: a. Knight of the Légion d'honneur (France). b. Member Second …show more content…

Determination, Decisiveness, Resilience can achieve victory as well as long term strategic goals. d. Transparency in actions and keeping promise can help the leader to solve critical problems easily. e. Understanding technological advantages and managing potential weaknesses is a key requirement for military leadership. f. Operational Commanders need to find time to listen to subordinates, to understand and hear the views of others even where this may not appear significant in the mind of the commander. g. Operating outside the doctrine involves personal risk for leaders but has to be considered if it delivers the strategic outcomes. h. Professionalism, desire to succeed, willingness to seek and accept responsibility, willingness to take personal risk, etc are pre-requisites to be a successful leader. j. Human Quality is equally important besides military knowledge in the Multi-National Force Structure. k. Inculcating Ethos and core values can make a ranking officer a great military leader. 18. Recommendations. In view of the above, followings are recommended for the future military leaders: a. Military leaders may define their mission and promulgate a vision of success in advance in case of all actions or

Show More
Related
509 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.

Read More
1633 Words | 7 Pages

Military leaders must understand the enemy and enemy movements. With planning you must find not only the strengths and weaknesses of your own men but the enemy as well. This is must in order to achieve a strategic advantage by controlling strategic points or areas in war. For example, the first two operations for Easy Co., Operation Overload and Operation Market Garden where the mission was to drop troops behind enemy lines along the Normandy Coastline and the Netherlands respectively, to secure roads, bridges and areas considered by the Allies to be of tactical importance. A military leader’s first job is to execute planning phase where they must identify locations that must be controlled even before the first bullet is fired.

Read More
688 Words | 3 Pages

Alexander was successful as a leader. While being a leader, you have to think of the way others feel and not just your personal needs. “... Alexander with a word of thanks for the gift, took the helmet and in full view of his troops, poured it on the ground”(Document D). The text

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

He was usually bold and reckless of his own life and safety. He inspired loyalty in his soldiers who only once ever refused to follow him. Alexander made ordinary soldiers feel he identified with them but also presented himself as a heroic and exceptional leader. He boasted morale after battles with rewards been given to those who had performed well and having funeral ceremonies

Read More
1223 Words | 5 Pages

One of the most successful generals in history was Alexander the Great. His success was achieved by sheer force. During his lifetime he defeated Persia, Greece, Egypt, Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea. Despite his military success, did Alexander deserve to be called “the Great”?

Read More
984 Words | 4 Pages

George C. Marshall is often characterized as a one of the most influential leaders, in respect to his work in both the military and civilian fields, of the 20th century and is attributed with developing a unique formula for leadership development based on his personal experiences that is still in use today. When evaluating Marshall in the sense of an adaptive leadership analysis one must consider the adaptive leadership characteristics that describe the actions he has taken throughout his career, such characteristics would include being confident, proactive, a critical thinker, and a change agent. In regard to Marshall’s confidence, it should first be said that throughout his career Marshall believed that everyone should speak their mind,

Read More
1530 Words | 7 Pages

In order to galvanize a large army, a leader must primarily be passionate and convinced in himself. These attributes surely describe Alexander the Great adequately. During

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Napoleon also, was a skilled military leader and became the first emperor of France. Napoleon was a French leader whom quickly rose through the ranks of military during the French revolution and drove his military to expansion and change in the western world. Although they cannot be compared in every way because Napoleon twice relinquished his authority in military leadership, in which Alexander would not have even dreamt of doing. SECTION IV: Alexander the Great should be placed in a time capsule because of his outstanding and notable achievements of brilliant commands and undefeatable battles. He was young and clever with his battle tactics so that he could save the world from imperial enslavement.

Read More
815 Words | 4 Pages

Wherever human beings are accumulated together in large numbers, they need leadership. Even a school needs a principle to mentor and escalate the school’s rank. Armies need generals to lead them to a courageous victory. Civilians need governments, captains of industry and intellectual leaders of thought as well. However, There are characteristics common to most great leaders that can be picked out.

Read More
371 Words | 2 Pages

Dylan, Dauenhauer Corporal Serrano 2 October 2017 The Importance of Following Orders What is the importance of following orders? Following orders is what allows the military to operate in an organized and effective manner during important and challenging situations. Following orders ensures that everyone is in alignment with others and builds discipline by making a cohesive plan of instructions that ties everyone as one unit.

Read More
905 Words | 4 Pages

However if someone cannot do any one of these three things they are not able to be a leader regardless of the rank or position they hold. It could be said that these are the three pillars of leadership and without one of these pillars the roof comes crashing down. Taking

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

He does not set out to be a leader, but becomes one by the equality of his actions and the integrity of his intent" (McCarther 2015).  A leader should lead from the front and also have the ability to think quickly on their feet and take care of their Soldiers.  Have faith and trust that the leadership is doing their best to keep everything in

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

These are just a few of the army values and how they play an important part in an effective leader and follower’s day to day

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

Military leadership is the process of influencing others to accomplish the mission by providing purpose, direction, and motivation. Another significant aspect of emphasized by the army is charisma. Therefore, army strategy to have a great leader is to choose people with high charisma since follower are always drawn to leaders with charisma. By having a high charisma they can command the follower easily. The basic task of a leader are: achieve the mission with zero fatality.

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

Bruce and Vernakis mentioned that decisiveness especially in high-risk situations were also the result of discipline . Speaking of such situations, this is one of the main difference between military and non-military leadership- being better trained to be calm and composed in stressful, dangerous situations and understanding strategic actions

Read More

More about Leadership Performance Vs. Follower's Satisfaction

Open Document