ipl-logo

Fiscal Policies: George W. Bush Vs. Barack Obama

931 Words4 Pages

Comparison of Fiscal Policies: George W. Bush versus Barack Obama Justin Wallace Central Texas College Patrick Smith ECON 2301 Abstract The fiscal policies of both George W. Bush and Barack Obama and the effects of those policies on the economy of the country. A comparison between the two is necessary to have a better understanding of how the once surplus budget turned into a deficit in trillions. Both policies have some resemblances and differ on numerous occasions as well. However, both gradually deteriorated the economic growth and failed to recover the total debt. Keywords: fiscal policy, recession, deficit, Republicans, tax cut, bailout. Introduction According to Reem Heakal, “What is fiscal policy?” …show more content…

Bush and Barack Obama’s policies. Both have managed to increase debts and cause problems of their own thus affecting the economy in their own ways. There needs to be an amendment of the preceding and present fiscal policies starting from the establishment of this decade to the existing year. To comprehend the effects of each one of them and then lay blame on to one, both or neither, one needs to first understand the policies and then the aftereffects. When President Bush took office, the budget was a surplus which turned into a budget in deficit due to recession. The budget in deficit further deteriorated into 400 billion dollars a year due to tax cuts. After that, during the years 2005 to 2008 the economy boomed and the deficit was reduced to 200 billion dollars a year. In September 2008, the financial crisis hit as a result of which the budget deficit returned to 400 billion dollars a year. The cost of a decade long tax cut from 2001 to 2010 was 955 billion dollars. (Cited in Citizens for Tax Justice, Joint Committee on Taxation, and Congressional Budget Office [Article], http://costoftaxcuts.com/about/) Not only did this era see tax cuts but it also comprised of a large number of bailouts that too contributed a lot to the budget deficit faced now. Some argue that it still contributes in the current financial crisis faced by the …show more content…

That is a clear statement, that either way it was a burden on the tax payer. Both governments facilitated using tax cuts and bailouts but policies that could later recover were not effective enough. There are still extensions of the former fiscal policies in play and they still contribute in increasing the debt. Even the absence of recession failed to regulate or reduce the total debt. There needs to be a revision of the previous and current fiscal policies starting from the beginning of this decade to the current year. Only then a policy should be devised to pay off the current debts and stabilize the economic

Show More
Related
976 Words | 4 Pages

Reagan led through the pursuit of a more conservative means of governance, vying for limited government intervention in the economy, while FDR pushed a more liberal agenda, emphasizing government intervention and relief programs. The first key difference between Reagan and Roosevelt’s means of handling the country economically and politically was their approach towards the economy. Roosevelt would inherit the United States during the 1930’s, a period in time characterized by its severe economic downturn and economic fallout. Prior to the 1930’s, the Laissez-Faire ideological approach towards the economy had held strong, with the belief that the economy would mend itself regardless of any anomalies or deviations from the norm. However, the 1930’s proved that this hands off approach wasn’t going to allow the economy to heal itself; government intervention was needed.

Read More
416 Words | 2 Pages

Thirty-seven years ago, Ronald Reagan gave his inaugural address prior to taking office as the 40th president of the United States. Reagan was a Republican candidate who campaigned heavily against the government as well as his opponent. The government had grown into an imperious bureaucracy since the revising administration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. In his address, he stated that the “…government is the problem…” to the United States (325). Reagan maintained that the government was overspending and overregulating, deficit and inflation were high, and the tax burden was heavy.

Read More
378 Words | 2 Pages

First, taxes were cut by 25 percent over three years (Schultz, 2013). Second, cuts were made to social programs such as food stamps, welfare and unemployment. Lastly, he proposed an increase of $1.2 trillion in military spending over five years. The tax cuts, Reagan argued, would allow for new investments which would increase federal revenue. The increase in spending actually caused a rise in the nation’s debt.

Read More
68 Words | 1 Pages

Republican President Ronald Reagan is known for ending the Cold War and also for increasing the USA’s national debt. This extended essay aims to investigate why the debt after the cold war was so high. Ronald Reagan was nearly killed in an assassination attempt, which resulted in many politicians to feel sympathetic towards Reagan. This would have resulted in an advantageous position for Reagan to pass his bills.

Read More
1524 Words | 7 Pages

On the domestic front, President Ronald Reagan implemented policies to reduce the federal government’s reach into the daily lives and pocketbooks of Americans, including tax cuts intended to spur growth (known as Reaganomics). He also advocated for increases in military spending, reductions in certain social programs and measures to deregulate business. By 1983, the nation’s economy had started to recover and enter a period of prosperity that would extend through the rest of Reagan’s presidency. Critics maintained that his policies led to budget deficits and a more significant national debt; some also held that his economic programs favored the rich.

Read More
205 Words | 1 Pages

The lack of government spending contributed to an even larger economic collapse. Austerity under current thought would cause a widening gap of wealth. Germany will

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Every time there is an election, there are always promises made (and sometimes not upheld) by politician’s to tackle the nation’s deficit spending. The nation heard the two presidential candidates’ debate the topic frequently during the Presidential debates. The deficit spending is part of what makes up the United States national debt. John Keynes supported the idea of deficit spending during a recession time in our nation. Herbert Hoover was openly against a deficit because it would collapse what our nation was founded on.

Read More
1383 Words | 6 Pages

So, the federal government should be held to the same standards. Huckabee states, “You can’t spend what you don’t have; you can’t borrow what you can’t pay back.” The Obama administration does not seem interested in lowering government spending and decreasing the national debt. Instead, he continues to ask congress to borrow from other countries and spend more money. One bill that Obama proposed was a stimulus plan which increased spending by about one trillion dollars.

Read More
854 Words | 4 Pages

has some of these problem that occurred in Greece. As mentioned earlier the country is in debt with 18.2 trillion dollars in debt, and recently legislators have had problems deciding on a spending budget. Somehow the country has not collapsed the reasoning is that the government keeps raising spending budgets and therefore the government has permission to spend more money. I don’t think this what the government should be doing when there is a debt that continues to grow. The U.S. should be less concerned on spending and more concerned on creating a surplus, which is a solution to pay off the debt.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Assignment III Monetary and fiscal policymakers should not try to stabilize the economy. It is an ideal thought of altering the economy with policies, however, the effectiveness is not as great as one would automatically assume. An alteration in the monetary or fiscal policy are not instant and take time to become effective. Policymakers would have to plan on how a policy change would affect the future economy. A change in the monetary policy would directly alter the interest rate of goods and services.

Read More
821 Words | 4 Pages

Managing yearly deficits is important because it means the government is trying to control its spending in relation to what it is earning in tax revenues (Kraft & Furlong, 2015). Consistently running deficits contributes to the astronomical US debt, which accrues interest (Kraft & Furlong, 2015). Kraft and Furlong (2015) really put this point into perspective when they pointed out that the more the debt grows, the more interest is owed, which when paid means that money is essentially being thrown away because it is not being used to enrich citizens’ lives. According to Kraft and Furlong (2015), by managing deficits and debt, the US would “show fiscal responsibility” (p.223), which should be a goal of any political

Read More
521 Words | 3 Pages

However, the government like in past, made numerous key choices that fractured the Keynesian Theory. These decisions of course then instigated fiscal policy to be examined again and it was truly necessary("Monetary and Fiscal Policy"). Lets also look at the issues that President Johnson created that somewhat “severed” the economy once again. As the U.S Department of State underlined “President Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969) and Congress launched a series of expensive domestic spending programs designed to alleviate poverty. Johnson also increased military spending to pay for American involvement in the Vietnam War.

Read More
1286 Words | 6 Pages

Classical and Keynesian economic theories translate directly into American politics and fiscal public policy. There are stark contrasts with the Republican’s belief in the classical economic theory and the Democrat’s position to implement fiscal spending based on the Keynesian approach to economic stimulation. This is evident in the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and Barack Obama. The Keynesian approach to influence economic growth has left our country severely in debt without a sound fiscal vision to pay down the national debt to an acceptable level. Both economic theories have their advantages when the economic markets are struggling, finding a balance to debt management and economic soundness is the key to any nation’s economic policy.

Read More
1034 Words | 5 Pages

However, Reagan’s attempt in rolling back the state presented several drawbacks, some of them caused by the US political context. Let us now examine how the neoliberal revolution has affected the US government spending and how Reaganomics has responded to the newly shaped context. Tax cuts introduced by the Kemp-Roth inevitably led to trade and budget deficits (Blanchard, 1987). From 1981 to 1985, a decrease in inflation and an increase in deficits led the economy through a recession. In response to the political pressure on spending from the large deficits, in August 1985 the “Balanced Budget and Emergency Control Act” – better known as the Gramm Rudman-Hollings bill – was approved (ibid.).

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

The tax cut and increased defense spending increased the federal deficit. Increased spending for welfare programs and unemployment compensation, both of which were induced by the plunge in real GDP in the early 1980s, contributed to the deficit as well. As deficits continued to rise, they began to dominate discussions of fiscal policy. The events of the 1980s do not suggest that either monetarist or new classical ideas should be abandoned, but those events certainly raised doubts about relying solely on these approaches. Reducing the deficit dominated much of fiscal policy discussion during the 1980s and 1990s.

Read More

More about Fiscal Policies: George W. Bush Vs. Barack Obama

Related Topics

Open Document