ipl-logo

Flowers For Algernon Arguments

568 Words3 Pages

Aviva Keating
Putman
Hour 2 and 5
15 November 2016
Argument Paper

Scientists have not yet achieved the feat of improving humans with artificial intelligence. The story Flowers for Algernon is a fictional account of a man 's experiences before and after having surgery to improve his intelligence levels. Charlie Gordon, the man who undergoes the experiment, had an IQ of 68 when he was approached by two doctors about an opportunity to triple his intelligence. He accepts the offer and completes multiple tests to track his progress. Charlie races against an extremely intelligent mouse named Algernon who has been given the same surgery. Eventually, he beats Algernon and becomes an intelligent human, even smarter than his teacher Ms. Kinnian and …show more content…

Another way Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss were not ethical was that they did not ask themselves the necessary questions before doing the procedure. According to the University of Washington School of Medicine 's paradigm of Ethics in Medicine, a doctor must ask themselves "Is the patient mentally capable and legally competent, and is there evidence of incapacity?" Legally competent means having the ability to make sound decisions regarding the legal aspects of an operation. Charlie, being a mentally disabled person, did not have the capabilities to make a reasonable conclusion. Conducting surgery on someone who is not mentally able to make sound decisions can be considered medical negligence.
Although Charlie 's doctors were not ethical, some people believe the doctors ' actions were ethical. The doctors did not hurt Charlie, nor did they lie to him. All the doctors did was not tell him the outcome of they procedure, but they did that in order to spare him.
In summary, Charlie Gordon 's doctors were not ethical because they did not follow the Hippocratic Oath or ask themselves the necessary ethical questions doctors must ask themselves. They acted foolishly and because of that, they hurt Charlie in the long run. Possibly, if Dr. Nemur and Dr. Strauss gave him all the information, Charlie wouldn 't have agreed to the operation and wouldn’t have had to go through the pain of losing everything. He couldn 't make a good choice based on the information

Show More
Related
1300 Words | 6 Pages

Claire Aguilar-Hwang Mrs. Veitch 2 2/15/18 Endless Possibilities Entering a rocket, risking life, exhilarating adventures waiting. Travelling to the moon, to the endless possibilities in outer space, just like what 37 year old Charlie Gordon feels in the science fiction short story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes. He has a surgery, risking his life. There are highs and lows waiting for him the minute the surgery is complete.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

The First reason Charlie Shouldn't have done Surgery Is because that would have been the first time they did the surgery on a human they only did it on a mouse. They should have waited to see what was gonna happen to the mouse before they did it on a human but, Charlie said “I told them becaus all my life I wantid to be smart and not dumb” . So in a way Charlie wanted to do it, but they should have picked something else or tried it with some other animals. Before they tried it with a living, walking human. They also

Read More
1650 Words | 7 Pages

Informed Consent “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” details the injustice and hardships that an African American woman endured when skin color determined the value of a person/during a time dominated by racial segregation/when racial segregation was the law of the land. Born in Roanoke, Virginia, on August 1, 1920, Henrietta Lacks was forced to follow to racial segregation laws that prohibited Blacks from interacting with Whites in such public places as bathrooms, seating areas, colleges, and hospitals. Like all African Americans, she was treated as an inferior member of society due to her skin color. At the age of thirty, Mrs. Lacks had developed cervical cancer and went to Johns Hopkins Hospital, which only treated Blacks at the time.

Read More
718 Words | 3 Pages

I think that Charlie should have the surgery because of these 3 reasons, he is super smart, he realizes a lot more things in life , and that he can power through depression. The first reason that Charlie should have the surgery is that he is

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

The author uses this device to show the character’s realization of how American society values intelligence and education. As Charlie’s intelligence grows, he is able to understand and connect with his peers, as shown when he says, “I am beginning to understand Algernon’s behavior, and it’s beginning to make sense to me” (Keyes, 23). This quote highlights how knowledge can foster empathy and understanding, which is

Read More
608 Words | 3 Pages

This begs the question, should Charlie have had the surgery. Charlie, in most minds, was right for having the surgery, it not only gave him genius level intelligence, but allowed him to make great leaps in science and technology.

Read More
514 Words | 3 Pages

In the story, Dr. Nemur was sometimes really cold to Charlie throughout his testing. They also did not show him if anything was going wrong with the test and Charlie was not away until he made his theory on Algernon. The doctor's failed the patient by not telling him that he would die and he did not have a parent guardian to help him make the hard decisions (Siegler). Charlie when he made those decisions, had an IQ of sixty-eight and could not spell. Charlie Gordon's doctors did not act ethically when they performed the surgery to make him smarter.

Read More
707 Words | 3 Pages

Charlie Gordon 's doctors were acting ethically when they preformed the surgery that would ultimately make him smarter because this enhanced knowledge of the field of artificial intelligence. Having a wide range of knowledge in this field is essential to the development of human engineering and medical science. However conflicting with moral ideas, this field of research is mandatory to the expansion of knowledge and ultimate survival of the human race. Charlie may have been sacrificed, but it was for the greater good of the world. The doctors did not know the affects of this procedure would be this severe.

Read More
1036 Words | 5 Pages

After a number of tests and experiments, Charlie gets chosen to undergo the surgery. After the surgery, Charlie can now beat the mouse, Algernon, in a maze. Charlies writing ability has increased and he can now recall past events. He lacks social intelligence.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

Frank Reilly came over to Charlie and tells Charlie,” If anybody bothers you or trys to take advantage you call me or Joe and we will set em straight ” (Keyes 11). This information tells us that Frank Reilly and Joe Carp have Charlie’s back and if somebody messes with him then they would beat him up or talk to him. Some may say that Joe Carp and Frank Reilly were mean to Charlie and treated him wrong at the start of the story. Regardless, if Charlie didn’t get the surgery then probably Joe Carp and Frank Reilly would treat Charlie wrong because they wouldn’t know what Charlie is going

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

There were many side effects, but the doctors had told Charlie. Charlie happily agreed, unknowingly running to his doom. Charlie's doctor's had acted unethically when they had preformed the operation to increase Charlie's intelligence. Charlie's doctors, Dr Strauss and Dr Nemur, had failed to fully examine the effects the operation would have on Charlie.

Read More
1144 Words | 5 Pages

So, Charlie starts to write The Algernon-Gordon Effect. Which is when his brain begins to deteriorate and break down, which at one point would end up in a loss of life. Therefore he eventually moves away from New York and everyone he cares about. So, this brings up the question: Should Charlie really have had the surgery? In “Flowers for Algernon,” Charlie should have had the surgery because he was able to see the world around him truly, able to help others, and he wanted and was motivated to do

Read More
469 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the book Charlie changes as he goes from being an innocent, happy, mentally handicapped man who sees only the good in others, to a genius who has an increased ability to see beyond superficial and into the true motivations of others. He soon realizes that he has been an object of ridicule at the hands of his fellow workers, which causes him to feel lost.

Read More
662 Words | 3 Pages

The doctors failed to use a properly consenting patient, neglected Charlie’s emotional state, and failed to conduct proper research. If Charlie had a caretaker who could give consent on his behalf, similar to a minor, an operation of this sort could be ethical. Moreover, it could be ethical if the doctors’ research and further develop their theory before using a human test subject, and pay close attention to Charlie’s emotional and mental health. However, Charlie’s operation was performed without these precautions and guidelines, and he suffers greatly in the

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Through the bioethics program at Columbia University, I intend to further investigate a few areas of interest. Surgical ethics is a significant area of interest and holds importance to me. I am interested in investigating the ethics of conducting research on the decisional capacity of patients who have

Read More

More about Flowers For Algernon Arguments

Related Topics

Open Document