Frankenstein Rhetorical Analysis Essay

575 Words3 Pages

The first component of the rhetorical triangle is the rational appeal, where the writer uses logical reasoning to persuade their audience. The character who uses the rational appeal in narration is Victor Frankenstein. Frankenstein tells his personal story about his encounters with the Creature. He does not base his narration on how the actions made him feel, but the actions themself. He tells the story of the action and let them speak for themself. He believes that the readers will come to the same conclusion that the Creature is a horrible monster because the narration is logical. Frankenstein shares his personal stories with Walton about his encounter with the Creature and knows how it will make Walton feel. Frankenstein tells Walton that he does have a choice, but Frankenstein will tell …show more content…

Frankenstein is trying to persuade Walton that he should not go forward and the monster is bad literally. “Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater that his nature will allow” (Shelley 31). Don’t work too hard. However, Shelley is expressing many things through her narrative such as: science can go too far, actions have consequences. Don’t play God, monsters are not born monsters.” Frankenstein uses logic to persuade Walton that the Creature is evil by describing everything that he has done. Frankenstein begins when he realizes that the Creature murdered William. He expressed it saying, “The figure passed me quickly, and I lost it in the gloom. Nothing in human shape could have destroyed that fair