Free Narrative Essays: Jury Duty And My Grandfather
Researchers: Morgan Whetstone Luke Ames bundy-mugshot-lo.jpg Notes: Full name:Theodore Robert Bundy Date of murders: 1973 - 1978 Date of arrest: February 15, 1978 Date of birth: November 24, 1946 Victims profile: Girls and young women Method of murder: Beating with metal bar / Strangulation Locations: Washington/Colorado/Utah/Oregon/Florida/Idaho/Vermont, USA Status: Executed by electrocution in Florida on January 24, 1989 Victims and locations: bestmissinggirlsamp2.jpg Statement: Theodore “Ted” Bundy was a murderer who lived between November 24, 1946, and January 24, 1989.
The jury system originated in England hundreds of years ago. The colonists brought the jury system from England to the United States. In 1733, John Zenger, a printer, printed a newspaper critical for the British Government. His attorney convinced the jury to be in favor for Zenger because his criticisms were true. After this trial, it gave ordinary citizens the freedom of speech and the power to go against the king.
When asked why he voted not guilty, juror eight stated “Look, this boy has been kicked around all his life. You know---living in a slum, his mother dead since he was nine. He spent a year in and a half in an orphanage while his father served a jail term for forgery. That’s not a very good head start. He’s had a pretty terrible sixteen years.
Juror 2: He is an introvert who works as a bank clerk. Meek and high in agreeableness, he cannot hold an opinion of his own and adopts the opinion of the last person who has spoken. He seemed happy when he managed to help during the timing of recreating the ‘old man walking’ scene.
A juror that was very vulnerable to the pressure was Juror 2. He lacks diction, and seems weak in his beliefs. When the men are asked to share their opinions he says, “Well, it’s hard to put into words. I just-think he’s guilty” (Rose 14). Contrary to the second juror, the third jurors resents being pressured by his peers.
Each of the stories were developed with the same ideas in mind. Both stories start with a heavenly setting. God in heaven wanting to create the world and the rich Sky World featured in the Iroquois story. Soon the harmony is broken when women in both of the stories perform a malfeasance act. The women were to not touch a sacred tree in their world.
This man may be a bit timid in part due to his old age, but his quiet nature also makes him insightful, noticing very specific details about witnesses that many others on the jury missed. He seems to come off as the most respectable and well mannered man out of the twelve. He 's the first to change his vote to not guilty, mostly to give Juror 8 a chance to make his case and out of respect for his motives in gambling for support. In talking about the older man that gave testimony it 's almost as though he 's talking about himself, revealing that he wants to be useful and to do something valuable, even if it 's just this once as a juror. As you may have noticed out of all the twelve men in the movie, each and everyone of them has unique personalities, that all at one point throughout the trial, played a very effective role in deciding this boy 's fate.
It is about whether the jury has a reasonable doubt about his guilt. When the first ballot is taken, 10 of his fellow jurors agree that defendant is guilty while there is only one Juror had different view that defendant is innocent. Juror No. 10 begins a racist rant. As he continues, one juror
This process continues throughout the course of the movie, and each juror’s biases is slowly revealed. Earlier through the movie, it is already justifiable to label juror 10 as a bigoted racist as he reveals strong racist tendencies against the defendant, stating his only reason for voting guilty is the boy’s ethnicity and background. . Another interesting aspect of this 1957 film is the “reverse prejudice” portrayed by juror
Therefore, he tried to make the trial go faster by voting with the side with the most votes. My family in the real world also had to go through inconvenience of the jury duty. My cousin had her first prom and my Aunt got called for jury duty. She couldn’t help her daughter do her hair, makeup, and get pictures. My moms friend also had a conflict with the jury duty.
Juror Ten announces his intentions very early in the play. He speaks loudly and forcefully from the beginning, clearly showing his racism and prejudice towards the boy. Juror 10 quickly votes guilty and asserts that the defendant cannot be believed because “they’re born liars”. Additionally, he claims that the “kids who crawl outa those places are real trash.”
I think that I would like to be on a jury and experience what is required of a juror, I think everyone should be a member of the jury at least once in their lifetime. Having to experience the juries’ duties on a civil or criminal case, in some instance would be hard. Especially in a murder case involving children or battered women. When the judge gives you direction to please disregard that statement. How can you disregard information that you have heard?
He took his job as being the Foreman seriously by breaking up arguments and by making sure that everyone had a turn to speak. Despite having one of the hardest jobs in the jury, he remained civil and calm throughout the play. In the play “Twelve Angry Men” an argument between the jurors happens, the Physical Education Teacher stops it by saying, “All right. Let’s stop the arguing. Who’s got something constructive to say?”
The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar
On a sunny day in Ironbridge county, I was going outside to throw the football with my dad around 12:00. We were out there having a very nice time when I threw the ball into the woods and he told me to go into the woods and get it while he went and got us a snack. I went into the woods and got the football when I heard barking. I had never liked dogs and I still don’t. This dog chewed through his leash and ran after me.
More about Free Narrative Essays: Jury Duty And My Grandfather
Outline Of Theodore Robert Bundy: Serial Killer
337 Words | 2 PagesJury System DBQ Essay
515 Words | 3 PagesTwelve Angry Men: Comparing The Book And Film
726 Words | 3 PagesJuror 3 Character Analysis Essay
980 Words | 4 PagesPeer Pressure In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men
1247 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Iroquois And Genesis
528 Words | 3 PagesArgumentative Essay On 12 Angry Men
549 Words | 3 PagesMinority Influence In 12 Angry Men
1458 Words | 6 PagesExamples Of Social Injustice In 12 Angry Men
803 Words | 4 PagesThe Justice System In Twelve Angry Men
591 Words | 3 Pages12 Angry Men Analysis
814 Words | 4 PagesArgumentative Essay On Jury Duty
577 Words | 3 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesFallacies In 12 Angry Men
1404 Words | 6 PagesPersonal Narrative: A Day In Ironbridge County
205 Words | 1 Pages