ipl-logo

Second Wilders Case Study

881 Words4 Pages

How did the judiciary of the Netherlands solve the conflict between freedom of expression and discriminatory hate speech in the second wilders case?
Introduction
The right to freedom of speech is a fundamental human right protected by treaties of several global and European institutions. In a democracy it might be necessary to avoid certain forms of speech that offend or promote hatred against others based on intolerance. The right to freedom of expression is considered essential for politicians and specifically for opposition politicians.
The two Wilders cases display the conflict that can arise between freedom of speech and between the protection of a group of people from discriminatory hate speech.
This paper will analyse how the judiciary of the Netherlands solved the conflict between freedom of expression and between …show more content…

This was because he asked the crowd whether they wanted more or fewer Moroccans in their city and in the Netherlands, on which the crowd shouted fewer fewer multiple times. Which wilders promised to fulfil by saying ‘’we’ll arrange that’’.
The public prosecutor prosecuted wilders afterwards for damaging the reputation of a group of people based on race and for inciting hatred and discrimination. The prosecutor said that it believes freedom of speech should not limit a politician in saying what they want but that this freedom has limitations when it comes to discrimination and hatred. The Court based their decisions on the witnesses’ statements that the remarks at the post-election meeting had been made after considerable thought and that the public was told to chant and that the main aim was for the questions and the chanting to be covered in the media and in the

Show More
Related

Bethel School District V. Fraser Case Summary

84 Words | 1 Pages

In the “Bethel School District v. Fraser” case, Fraser believed that the school violated his first amendment “freedom of speech” rights. Fraser gave a speech with some inappropriate content in it and the school gave him a three day suspension because two teachers warned him before he gave the speech. Fraser took it to court and the justices said they would shorten the suspension and let him have his right to speak at graduation because the school was taking away his freedom of speech.

Read More

Zundel's Did Six Million Really Die?

1134 Words | 5 Pages

The Supreme court ruled that Section 181 of the Criminal Code intersects section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which guarantees the right to freedom of expression as long as the expression is not violent. They defined that the booklet that he created was not violent and allowed under the concept of freedom of expression as the form is different from the content in this scenario thus, the allegation made did not apply. The court found that section 181's attempt to censor all expressions unjustifiable since many acceptable expressions could fit that description. According to analysis, section 181 was a reasonable limit on freedom of expression in a free and democratic society. In the end, majority of the Supreme Court held that section 181 of the Criminal Code was unconstitutional and therefore, his conviction was overturned even though this is not what most wanted, the situation was dealt in this matter due to the

Read More

James Keegstra Case Analysis

1148 Words | 5 Pages

The suppression of hate propaganda signifies an infringement of individual’s freedom of expression. An activity that conveys a message through non-violent forms of expression is protected under the s.2 of the Charter regardless of how offensive it is. Moreover, there was a misapplication of Charter, which made s.319 (2) of the Criminal Code to fail the proportionality test. There was no relation between the criminalization of hate speech and its suppression. Although his comments were offensive, they did not pose any threats they way violence or violence threats would have.

Read More

Principles Of Miranda Vs Arizona Democracy

569 Words | 3 Pages

This case began in 1963 and ended in 1966 when the Supreme Court ruled that all detained criminal suspects should be informed of their constitutional rights to an attorney and against self incrimination. In this case, the Supreme Court implemented a few of the foundations of democracy to come to a verdict such as the one in this case which was to ensure that the rights of every

Read More

Ap Euro Dbq Essay

712 Words | 3 Pages

Doc. #2 Description of Document: The Dutch were explaining how they believed in “freedom to express their opinions” of religion

Read More

Why The First Amendment (And Journalism) Might Be In Trouble

1055 Words | 5 Pages

Freedom of expression is one of the laws the forefathers of America made to empower its citizens and also enables them to live in peace amongst themselves. In most countries around the world, freedom of expression does not exist, so there is always war in those countries. In the article “Why the First Amendment (and Journalism) Might Be in Trouble”, the authors, Ken Dautrich, chair of the Public Policy at the University of Connecticut and John Bare, who is the vice president for strategic planning and evaluation at the Arthur M. Blank Family foundation in Atlanta, conducted a research study on the importance of freedom of speech. They used their research findings to support freedom of expressions. They employed claim of policy, claim of fact and also appeal to pathos and logos in their argument of the importance of the freedom of speech.

Read More

Brown V. Board Of Education Case Study

974 Words | 4 Pages

The court consequently motivates are especially destructive to liberated citizens for the noticeable cause that there is not a useful boundary to the system’s extent of evaluation. Where there are inequality to be establish or, somewhat, apparent, then the court is allowed to maintain control. However essentially, a court that seeks out the significance of its date can provide no stability to the verdict it gives out. If proof of this is necessary, then the attention falls to

Read More

Establishment Clause Case Study

1182 Words | 5 Pages

Additionally this case examines the infringement of an individual's freedom of speech by

Read More

Essay On First Amendment In Schools

462 Words | 2 Pages

The first amendment of our Constitution states that we as citizens have the right to freedom of speech, granting us the right to express ourselves as individuals without interference or constraint from the government. But does this right apply to students in your average public school? The Supreme Court has ruled that the government has the right to prohibit speech that disrupts peace or causes violence, especially in public schools. In fact, there have been multiple instances in which the Supreme Court has gotten involved in the first amendment rights of public school students.

Read More

The Constrained Court

429 Words | 2 Pages

The Court’s effectiveness relies on the institutional capacities as well as the ruling’s popularity. When lower-court judges comply with Supreme Court decisions, rulings can have a substantial effect on social policies, as in the case

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Polarization

990 Words | 4 Pages

Malicious criticisms of the opposition work to a similar effect, as they may mimic mudslinging and other discourteous practices. Some argue that limiting hate speech could infringe on First Amendment rights, but this perspective fails to recognize that its limitation does not inherently mean the prohibition of free speech. Instead, it prevents “hate speech from escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility and violence,” all of which are illegal under international law (Guterres). Resultedly, limited hate speech not only preserves the civility of conversation but also other amendment rights, outweighing the losses of limited hate speech. If clear and effective parameters are set, limited hate speech could greatly benefit the

Read More

Essay On Hitler's Totalitarian State

788 Words | 4 Pages

Violence and fear was the base of Hitler’s totalitarian state. Document 2, a caricature of Hitler and his army shows how Hitler’s violence has resulted in fear and total control. On 2 August 1934, President von Hindenburg died. The previous day, the cabinet had enacted the "Law Concerning the Highest State Office of the Reich", which stated that upon Hindenburg's death, the office of president would be abolished and its powers merged with those of the chancellor.

Read More

Freedom Of Speech: The RAV V. St. Paul Case

764 Words | 4 Pages

Everyone loves having the ability to voice their opinions without restrictions. This right is called Freedom of Speech, taking this away from Americans would be the equivalent to causing WWIII. People often use this right to defend themselves when stating opinions However, how long does it take before Freedom of Speech simply becomes Hate Speech? Written in 1789 the Bill of Rights contains about 27 Amendments, these were soon ratified down into the 10 Amendments we’re familiar with today. Amongst these amendments is the 1st amendment, which grants us some of our most important rights as humans.

Read More

Hannah Arendt Public Opinion

1654 Words | 7 Pages

In the literary public sphere, “public discussion deals with objects connected to the activity of the state.” In the political public sphere, policymakers and public officials create, finalize, and exercise laws, laws that are based on contributions made by the public in the literary public sphere. A court of law is a key component of the domain of the political public sphere (Habermas 49-50). In the case of Eichmann’s trial, private interests have interfered with the language of the law, and thus with the functioning of the political public sphere. More specifically, “the exercise of political control” is, in this instance, no longer “effectively [subordinate] to the democratic demand that information be accessible to the public” (Habermas 49).

Read More

The Harm Principle And Free Speech In John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

1236 Words | 5 Pages

After the shootings at Charlie Hebdo, there was tremendous sympathy for the victims. However the debate over whether there are any limits to free speech continues, and this is what I will argue throughout this essay. The question I pose; are there any cases when expression should be limited? Looking at John Stuart Mill’s twofold argument on the topic we get an insight into his theory of ‘The Harm Principle and Free Speech’ in On Liberty (Mill, 1859).

Read More

More about Second Wilders Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document