ipl-logo

From Socrates 'Morality Of Athenians' Consent According To Socrates

565 Words3 Pages

As Socrates address the central issue of escaping without the Athenians’ consent, he emphasizes his stance as a non-consequentialist, a person who determines rightness using reason, obligation, duty, or virtue. He does his best to avoid the consequentialist stance, which focuses on the outcomes or consequences that are used to determine the rightness or wrongness of an action. Standing firm as a non-consequentialist, Socrates made the right decision of not escaping with the reasoning of his first argument: a person must never cause harm. Socrates is contradicting himself with one of his major points that a person must never commit wrongdoings. It is difficult to find any opposition against Socrates’ first argument, especially in the moral perspective. Socrates …show more content…

If Socrates were to escape his death penalty without receiving consent, he would be committing a wrongdoing as well as harming the Athenian people with his escape. Committing wrong against another wrong never makes the wrong into a right as committing an unjust act against an unjust act never turns it into a just act. Likewise, although the jury and the Sophists- paid teachers and relativists who taught anything a person wanted to learn about- did Socrates wrong, Socrates would be committing wrong against the law if he were to escape. Hence, Socrates decision to remain in prison is justified because he is not causing any harm to anyone, including himself. Secondly, Socrates made the correct decision because life is not worth it if a person lives with a tainted soul. “Socrates reasons that escaping will not bring him happiness and a good life” (Devettere, 2009). Devettere’s statement reveals that

Show More
Related

Reasons Contributing To Face Death In Plato's Crito

876 Words | 4 Pages

The laws are suppose to protect the society and its people, yet when the order of the government turns corrupt, then the validity of everything is at stake. As one can see, the corrupt laws placed Socrates in prison and he chose to abide by the impartial laws in order to be consistent and loyal to the

Read More

Socrates My Good Crito Analysis

763 Words | 4 Pages

This he is unwilling to do because he holds it in such high regards and believes that if people did not follow the laws it would cause the fall of Athens. Therefor by him not accepting his punishment he would consider himself one of the highest criminals. This is yet another paradigm of how important the opinion of the majority is because they are the ones who create the laws. By following the laws you are really following the opinion of the majority. Here we see that perhaps Socrates was inconsistent in his reasoning as he places such a great weight on the majority opinion through law.

Read More

Socrates Argument Of Tacit Agreement In The Crito

543 Words | 3 Pages

Breaking this agreement would leave his conscience guilty and make his life not worthwhile. He also believes that if he were to leave it would tarnish his reputation of him, his children, who he wanted to raise in Athens, would also have to bear his reputation which would be ruined if he left. Socrates would rather die knowing that he did not break his agreement with Athens and ruin his reputation and have a clean conscience than flee to another city and live out the rest of his life with the guilt. Socrates also says that if he were to escape it would be hurting the city by undermining the judicial system and giving it no credibility to convict other criminals who would escape just as he did and leaving it susceptible to a state of no order and

Read More

How Does Crito Punish Socrates

657 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates would be abandoning his children if he lets himself be killed. In the situation, only consideration Socrates should make is whether or not it would be right to escape. therefore, Socrates ends up saying that ends don't justify means and one should abide by one's agreement. Argument of the laws of Athens was that since Socrates has chosen to live in Athens, he is bound to live under the Athenian law. The Athenian law states that Socrates must abide by the judgments of the state, and submit to his execution.

Read More

Socrates Arguments In The Crito

499 Words | 2 Pages

By breaking the law his soul would be ruined and a ruined soul is not worth living with. This goes back to when he said that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Also, when he dies he would enter Hades as an outlaw and will not be well welcomed. Therefore, he believes that he should stay and face his execution because it is better to die than to live with a ruined soul. Socrates uses all of these points to support his main argument which is that escaping jail would be morally incorrect.

Read More

The Injustice In Socrates: The Case Of Crito

1013 Words | 5 Pages

He reminds Crito “no human being should do injustice in return, whatever he suffers from others”(Crito, 49c). Socrates argues even if the jury's decision was unjust, it is never permissible for him to do injustice in return and therefore he will not try to escape. In essence, even though Socrates is offered the opportunity to

Read More

A Rhetorical Analysis Of Socrates 'Apology'

1314 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates was a greek philosopher who found himself in trouble with his fellow citizens and court for standing his grounds on his new found beliefs from his studies about philosophical virtue, justice, and truth. In “Apology” written by Plato, Socrates defended himself in trial, not with the goal of escaping the death sentence, but with the goal of doing the right thing and standing for his beliefs. With this mindset, Socrates had no intention of kissing up to the Athenians to save his life. Many will argue that Socrates’ speech was not very effective because he did not fight for his life, he just accepted the death sentence that he was punished with. In his speech he said, “But now it’s time to leave, time for me to die and for you to live.”

Read More

Socrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis

710 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates should remain in prison after evaluating Critos arguments although Socrates’s were stronger. I’ll begin with Crito’s argument and what makes them strong, and what doesn’t. Next, I’ll focus on Socrates arguments and what makes them good and what makes them weak, mainly his focus that living with a bad soul isn’t worth living when you have a bad soul. Crito gives Socrates three arguments.

Read More

Socrates: Plato's Decision To Accepting The Death Penalty

1434 Words | 6 Pages

Therefore, since Athens has a part to play in corrupting Socrates’s life as well as his mistaken visual of the truth, Socrates must understand that by obeying the state, he has done injustice to his soul for it will not be in true harmony. Furthermore he will be doing an injustice to the state because Plato would have established that, objectively, Athens laws are unjust and even if Socrates thinks that they are just, it is only because Socrates has been corrupted by

Read More

Socrates The Apology Quote Analysis

947 Words | 4 Pages

Was Socrates right to say he would stay in Athens no matter the consequences, or should he have fled Athens to avoid death? Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what because first, he believed he was sent to Athens or “placed in Athens” for a specific reason and he also believed that even though the Athenians found him as a threat and annoying, he believed that it helped them. Socrates was right to say he would stay in Athens no matter what the consequences were because he believed that he was placed or in Athens for a reason. This quote from “The Apology” is an example to prove that he was placed in Athens for a reason. “Because if I tell you that doing that would mean disobeying the god, and so I can’t keep quiet,

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)

Read More

To Kill A Mockingbird Essay

1803 Words | 8 Pages

The book “To Kill A Mockingbird” by Harper Lee begins with Jem's broken arm. The book takes place in Maycomb, a small Southern county in Alabama. The town is segregated and social economic class. This novel is set in 1933 during the great depression, it takes place in the town of Maycomb, Alabama before the civil rights movement. The main characters in the book are Jem, Scout, Atticus, Calpurnia, Boo Radley, Tom Robinson, and Aunt Alexandra.

Read More

Analysis Of Socrates: Four Dialogues, By Plato

1595 Words | 7 Pages

It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is much more so to use it against your country.” What we say in reply, Crito, that the laws speak the truth, or not?” (TDS pg 51,52). By breaking the law, Socrates would be disobeying the laws as a citizen, like a child disobeying his parent. By escaping he would have been doing an impious act that would affect his standing with the gods.

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

In Apology, Socrates faces possible execution as he stands trial in front of his fellow Athenian men. This jury of men must decide whether Socrates has acted impiously against the gods and if he has corrupted the youth of Athens. Socrates claims in his defense that he wants to live a private life, away from public affairs and teachings in Athens. He instead wants to focus on self-examination and learning truths from those in Athens through inquiry. Socrates argues that "a [man] who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if [he] is to survive for even a short time" (32a).

Read More

Plato's Republic: Just Or Unjust?

832 Words | 4 Pages

I think that there is a fallacy of irrelevance. In the book, Socrates sets out to defend the idea that it is always in one’s best interest to be just and to act justly and he suggests that the just person as one who has a balanced soul will lead one to act justly or why mental health amounts to justice. I feel that justice includes actions in relation to others, it includes considerations of other people’s good, and includes strong motivations not to act unjustly. I believe that Socrates’ defense of justice does not include constraining reasons to think that a person with a balanced soul will refrain from acts that are commonly thought to be unjust like theft, murder, and adultery.

Read More

More about From Socrates 'Morality Of Athenians' Consent According To Socrates

Related Topics

Open Document