The absence of freedom creates a society that is easily controlled. It’s similar to communism or a totalitarianism. Without freedom, our very nation would have not come into existence. Some people would say that the failures of freedom overshadow its successes, but the United States is built around those successes. Security gives you a path to take, and if you take that trail, it will lead to a complacent life.
The question is,is freedom all that crucial and also treasured more by those freedom has been withheld like Maya Angelou and Frederick Douglass say. All of this is honestly opinion and we go for centuries arguing the point but our objective as people isn’t to figure out the logistics of who's right or wrong ,but to gain freedom and cherish it
To be honest I wouldn’t give up my freedom for increased security from terrorism. Benjamin Franklin stated, “They who would give up essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security.” I couldn’t have said it any better. We have been fighting for our rights for a very long time. Many people have died to ensure that people have liberties.
Freedom is not really free. We are not just given the freedom to do as we please. Freedom is something that we need to monitor, it is something that is worth fighting for, and it is something that is limited, even in a “free” country. If we are not careful, we will lose the freedoms we have.
The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.
Later, the due process clause was used to merge the Bill of Rights to the states. The idea behind due process is that states cannot abolish citizen’s liberties without due process. Liberty comprises of the freedom of speech, press and religion and the right to an attorney if one is suspected of breaking the law. Today, states are unable to seize freedom from individuals. The Supreme Court has used the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment to say that the Bill of Rights encompasses not only the states as well as the federal government.
1 "It is a fair summary of constitutional history that the landmarks of our liberties have often been forged in cases involving not very nice people - Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter”(Civil Liberties and Civil Rights). As mentioned above from the Chief Justice 's quote, those who want to test liberties and rights are not people with proper civic consciousness. It creates confusion among people and causes confusion. Sometimes when we live, we often get confused with the right to enjoy our liberties. The difference between liberties and rights is whether law is involved or not, but sometimes people forget that part.
“Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else
Therefore, freedom is an illusion. For example, if we wanted to use our freedom of speech toward law enforcement we would face consequences for disrespecting an authority. Although, the first amendment is supposed to protect us, it does not excuse us from hindrance or consequences. The illusion that we have freedom is merely something created by the ruling power because they create and determine what actions the general public are able to do according to the
From the beginning of time people have sought to enjoy personal freedoms without others having a say in what they do, Utilitarianism does not protect the individual rights that we were meant to have; however, libertarians strongly support individual rights and their protection. Should the government, stop doing it’s job and everything it stands for (protect our individual rights) for the happiness of majority of people? The idea and installment of government occurred because everyone felt the need to have their individual rights protected be it from external dangers, meaning threats outside of the geographic location that the government established controls, and from internal dangers, meaning from inside the geographic location under the government's control. No where in our constitution or in our
Freedom I believe once freedom has been won, it can be taken away. If you are being bad or not following the rules, than you should not have the rights to do what you want. Freedom has been given to you for a reason, and you need to use it for that reason. I believe it should be taken away because sometimes freedom shouldn’t always be “free.” You should be limited on what you get to do.
Freedom is not restriction of civil liberties to maintain order and stability. Take for instance Colin Kaepernick. To protest African-American mistreatment and police brutality, Kaepernick, an NFL quarterback, began to kneel during the playing of the national anthem, spreading uproar and outrage throughout the country, with many calling for punishment
Freedom is not the right to purchase weapons of destruction. Freedom does not result in everyday shootings because teenagers - psychopaths - murderers - are able to
The main idea of freedom is to be respectful and helpful to the community. Freedom is not endless. Freedom should be limited in some circumstances for the benefits of the community. You can't just do whatever you want just saying that “I have freedom.” We can’t kill people, do things illegally.
In 1787, our founding father’s agreed to write a list of principals for keeping people free. Freedom must be limited. People can not just say they are free. You can not just kill or violate just for freedom. There should be respect for people’s wants and needs.
