Garrett Hardin's Argument For Helping The Poor

594 Words3 Pages

Helping the poor
Garrett Hardin puts forward an argument against helping the poor that it will increase overpopulation. It is agreeable that his idea of helping the poor will increase overpopulation. Overpopulation is an acute problem that effect the poor even today. Many of the richer countries are like a lifeboat, trying to stay afloat, because only so many people can fit into the lifeboat. So while doing what they can to help others they have to not drown themselves. By stopping or regulating immigration would help the poor because it causes overpopulation in certain areas of the world that brings a host of other problems along with it. Lastly, even though the world created the world food bank it has done little to stop the problems of the poor. …show more content…

The life boat, however, of the wealthier countries are limited in resources and do not have the space to let anyone else in. If they try to save the poorer people from drowning because they only have so much room and to share the wealth with them would outcome in a catastrophe for everyone. Hardin states, “And since the world’s resources are dwindling, the difference in prosperity between the rich and poor can only increase” (584). The 'boat' would sink or the resources would run out, meaning that everybody would drown. Hardin metaphor demonstrates that, overall, it would be devastating to help the poor; the world's resources would be exhausted and no one would live. So, it can be proved that Hardin's argument is true on several