ipl-logo

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

558 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Hardin lifeboat ethics analysis

In the following selection “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping The Poor” Garrett Hardin acknowledges a problem that doesn’t have a correct solution. He continuously agrees about exceeding carrying capacity when in a life or death situation. In contrast he believes that you should give your spot up for someone so that your conscious want feel guilty, even though it doesn’t change the fact that you can’t save everyone. Hardin argument uses a lifeboat metaphor to allude to the real problem, which is some nations are wealthy and stable were as some nations are poor and barely making it. But you can’t save everyone who needs to be saved, we have limit on resources. Hardin alludes to that no matter what you do to save lives, there always will be someone you can’t save. …show more content…

In the first paragraph, Hardin refers to each nation as a lifeboat full of just the rich, “outside each lifeboat swim the poor of the world, who would like to get in, or at least to share some of the wealth” (Hardin 291) which creates an unbalanced image of our society today for his readers. Hardin is very detailed and uses many examples so that all readers can understand. Hardin points out that land has a limited capacity just like a lifeboat, but what he fails to acknowledge is that everyday science is improving. We the people are coming with new ways to make living easier for everyone, which can keep all nations. New living improvements will allow the troubled area to be equal to the other

Show More
Related

Comparison Of Andrew Carnegie And Samuel Gomper In The Gospel Of Wealth

476 Words | 2 Pages

Meaning that whether you are poor or rich is that person fault and that if you want better in life do something about it. Carnegie is an example of some who started poor than made something of himself instead of staying in the same condition. In Gomper document he describes how these employees are dying of hunger and families are suffering. These employees brought these problems upon themselves based on Carnegie document. These employee has the same opportunity to be just like their employer but they are not strong enough to make it

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Lifeboat Ethics By Garrett Hardin

1241 Words | 5 Pages

Hardin wants his audience to see his rationale, which forms the basis of his argument behind not helping the poor. It is impossible for the reader to draw the line as well as pick and choose between who he or she wants to save or let drown. This goes back to reinforce Hardin’s argument because affluent nations cannot simply select one impoverished nation they want to support and ignore all over nations facing the same economic instability. Instead, they must provide consistent aid to every nation; however, doing so is financially taxing, taking a toll on their own economic

Read More

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Analysis

252 Words | 2 Pages

The poverty dilemma has been one of the greatest phenomenon that our society has seen over the past 40 years and it became one of the most important factors of political problems. Poverty has many faces, some people define it as the lack of money or food, and others define it as feeling unwanted in the society. On a macro level, a nation called poor when the most of its population falls under the poverty line and here where the author Garrett Hardin enter the scene with his article lifeboat ethics. He simile the nations with the lifeboats as both of them has a limited capacity. Garrett Hardin was an ecologist who were much warned about the human overpopulation and its results .Hardin received a B.S. in zoology from the University of Chicago

Read More

Analysis Of Social Change And The Growth Of Pre Revolutionary Urban Radicalism By Gary B. Nash

755 Words | 4 Pages

There was plenty of greed that Nash talks about in his piece from corrupt businessmen in Europe that traveled to North America to only gain financial success without consideration of the poor and middle class persons. Nash distinguishes the poor, who are the majority, lack the financial pleasures of the upper class noting that the economic instability in the colonies would result in turmoil and rebellion. He also articulates that much of the history we know of today is resulted from perspectives of the elite, who just like Daniel Dulany the Younger, were politicians, lawyers and businessmen who failed to understand the lives of the classes below them, depriving full history to be told. There is no fault to this matter because only the wealthy were able to partake in history and the accounts of the poor were not considered by society due to their financial insignificance of that

Read More

How Did Hitler Use Evidence Regarding The Culpability Of Bystanders

516 Words | 3 Pages

This quote recognizes that these acts of courage and compassion serve as a tribute to the fact that not all bystanders were passive or indifferent to the surrounding

Read More

Social Darwinism Dbq

1585 Words | 7 Pages

THis is supported by the idea of “social darwinism” which essentially stated that the weak would not succeed in nature and this was a good thing because it caused evolution and this was applicable to the economy as well. This is significant, because this justification was cited by many others, including the government in laws regarding regulation of labor. The main point of the 2nd passage is that the divide between classes is growing wider--as the rich get richer, the poor get poorer. The theory called conspicuous consumption states the wealthy spend money on frivolous things only to display their wealth, which is in contrast to those barely able to sustain their families paycheck to paycheck. THis would create not only economic disparity, but social animosity between the rich and poor.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Columbus And John Locke

441 Words | 2 Pages

They go further by explaining that the root of the problem is money and welfare. It is impossible to be in the state of nature because we live in a society with a governing body. And if all land was common, there would be no preservation of others because eventually resources will decrease to the point when humans won’t be able to survive. We can’t trust humans to engage in a productive lifestyle without government intervention due to our innate behavior and

Read More

Comparing The Story 'Night And Terrible Things'

607 Words | 3 Pages

For instance, the story “Terrible Things” by Eve Bunting on page 3, it states, “somebody help! But there was no one left to help”. Correspondingly, this story describes the events that occurred in the Holocaust, face to face to such discrimination, fear had praised their selfishness and people soon forgot their morals of edicts and the choice of helping not only yourself but others. In relegation, the passage, “Is Survival Selfish” by Lane Wallace (page 317 of collections), page 318,” she got out of the plane and survived very few others in the plane, which was soon consumed by smoke and fire. For reference, if she didn’t have survival ethics she wouldn’t have survived, however, if she had time to save herself, it’s logical to rush the people out the plane, to yell and manifest a hope of survival for they were consumed by fear, for say she could have distinguished what’s at risk.

Read More

Similarities Between Hardin And Walter Benjamin's Lifeboat Ethics

384 Words | 2 Pages

Garret Hardin and Walter Benjamin wrote essays called “Lifeboat Ethics” and “Challenge to the Eco-Doomsters. Both authers present different points of view when it comes to immigration, foriegn aid, and population. Hardin is opposed to immigration and compares the United States to a lifeboat that can only hold so many people before it sinks. He belives if we keep letting people in to the country we will overcrowded and everyone who is already here will be effected. He says the country is a “commons”, and can hold only so many people.

Read More

Andrew Carnegie's Administration Of Wealth

880 Words | 4 Pages

He argues having a trust fund dedicated to a few people who decide what the best option to use it for, is better than just giving money to everyone in the town for example and letting them run wild with free money. Although people always want to have money, it’s apparent that not everyone decides what to do with it wisely. If 5 people who are worthy of being chosen for example use money given by the wealthy; this action becomes the “means” by which is necessary to support the “many” with opportunities like libraries, shelters, railroads, really anything that is necessary for an economy or town to flourish. Thus, the wealthy live the way they choose with a significantly modest amount; any surplus wealth is used to benefit those who have less, mimicking a symbiotic solution that Carnegie believes rich and poor are faced

Read More

Garrett Hardin's Argument For Helping The Poor

594 Words | 3 Pages

Helping the poor Garrett Hardin puts forward an argument against helping the poor that it will increase overpopulation. It is agreeable that his idea of helping the poor will increase overpopulation. Overpopulation is an acute problem that effect the poor even today. Many of the richer countries are like a lifeboat, trying to stay afloat, because only so many people can fit into the lifeboat. So while doing what they can to help others they have to not drown themselves.

Read More

Lifeboat Ethics Rhetorical Analysis

1211 Words | 5 Pages

Hardine declared the metaphor “spaceship” can be dangerous when used by misguided idealists, sharing our resources with uncontrolled immigration and foreign aid would consider to be the ethics of a lifeboat. He gave a logical reasoning about if we help all the swimmer to get on the boat, the boat will drown and we all die. Also “when we let an extra 10 into our lifeboat, we will have lost our “safety factor”, this is true, if we don’t leave space for safety factor, even us can face some catastrophic consequences. He said “since the world’s resources are dwindling , the difference in prosperity between the rich and the poor can only increase”, the poor nations reproductive rate is a lot greater than the rich, and so helping the poor probably will lead to more poor people. In “the tragedy of commons” , he concluded “only the replacement of the system of the commons with a responsible system of control will save the land, air, water and ocean fisheries” which an accurate statement for “commons” can be diminish overtime if no one take the responsibility to care for it.

Read More

The Prisoner's Dilemma Game

260 Words | 2 Pages

After reading Harding’s “The tragedy of the commons” and “The Prisoner’s dilemma game” what do you think about Adam Smith’s famous quote? “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest” in other words, will the pursuit of self-interest by individuals promotes the wellbeing of the rest of the community? After reading Hardin’s “The tragedy of the commons” and the prisoner’s dilemma game, this example could be interpreted as a metaphor why? Because in the Tragedy of the commons the community is unable to achieve rational agreements on the human resources.

Read More

Is Survival Selfish Lane Wallace Analysis

288 Words | 2 Pages

“Is Survival Selfish” is an argumentative text written by Lane Wallace. The text focuses on the question of whether survival is an act of selfishness or intelligence. Author Wallace also draws your attention to whether saving someone in dire situations is altruism or idiocy. Throughout the story, the author provides evidence in means to support her claim and reasons. Wallace believes that “self-preservation” isn’t always instinctual and there are many factors involved, including the fact that every survival testing situation is different.

Read More

Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Analysis

755 Words | 4 Pages

Nevertheless, Hardin does not succeed in persuading the readers of his viewpoints, as Hardin fails to provide enough evidence to support his controversial arguments. In the article, Hardin discusses the principles behind supporting poor countries and how it can substantially hinder the growth and prosperity of the rich countries. Initially, the author provides two metaphors, the widely accepted spaceship metaphor and his own lifeboat metaphor, explicating why his lifeboat metaphor is more realistic. After that, the author elucidates to his audience how the rate of population growth in poorer countries is much greater than the rate of growth of rich countries, and how with the

Read More

More about Garrett Hardin Lifeboat Ethics Summary

Related Topics

Open Document