Recommended: Oil industry pollution
Choice of Issue Fracking Title Do the benefits of fracking outweigh the disadvantages? Background Fracking is fundamentally different than traditional gas extraction methods. Hydraulic fracturing (fracking) is when a well is drilled vertically into the earth then turns ninety degrees, becoming horizontal for thousands of feet into the targeted shale rock believed to contain the natural gas.
Drilling in Alaska “ In reality drilling is the slowest, dirtiest, and most expensive way to solve our energy crisis”-Lois Capps. This quote explains how there different ways to solve our problems and drilling is not the right way to solve this. In addition to costing a lot of money, it would also destroy animal habitats.
Both sides brought up compelling arguments, on the advantages and dangers of drilling for oil in the artic. The side supporting drilling projects in the artic brought up that the artic has a significant amount of oil and oil is in large demand. They also explained that an alternative would be preferred but there is no alternative that can meet to demand of our advancing civilization. Furthermore they put out that drilling in the artic will influence Canada’s economy, it will relocate drilling operations from near civilizations, and the artic is not war torn, there are no diplomatic issues there. They concluded by saying oil will be used throughout our lifetime and the longer we wait the more urgent the situation will get increasing the chance
Ryan, you make a good point mentioning that fracking towns set up to mine the gas increase crime, illness, and stress on rural communities. This affects every country with fracking towns, regardless if it is a developing country or not. Stress is an important aspect related to health, and stress increase in the entire population of a fracking town will also increase the illnesses of these people. These illnesses can make the fracking workers decrease on their work efficiency, that can lead to very important mistakes that could harm other or result in mistakes that can contaminate the environment around the fracking towns. I know I sound very pessimistic, but under constant (even permanent) stress (plus illness) people tend to work less efficiently
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrations (NOAP), the methane released from the Weld County gas wells in Colorado is equal to the carbon emissions of 1-3 million cars. Pollutants due to fracking which include ground level ozone (also known as smog), particle matter, and dust, have been linked to illness, cancer, and even birth defects. Crystalline silica, which is used in the shape of sand, can cause silicosis in workers. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), found that at 11 fracking sites the crystalline silica exceeded the health criteria. In 31% of the samples taken, even if the workers were wearing the proper breathing equipment they still wouldn’t be properly protected.
That’s when they realize they found the problem, but the bigger problem is how to find a way for humans to operate without using the same hydrocarbons. A week into the ban, people start to use electricity again. The attacks start again, but worse than before. The President was
With the increased scale of fracking in Texas, one might wonder if the oil boom is affecting our water supply. The value of water in Texas is deeply cherished considering Texas’s dry climate and long-standing droughts. One may even wonder if Texas is valuing its water as much as it is its oil. As research furthers, we can begin to weigh the positive and negative effects of oil fracking. By providing overwhelming data on oil fracking
Boom or Bust Just a few years ago Williston, North Dakota, was a quiet small town, with a population of around 12,000. Due to the oil prices and drilling, Williston is America’s biggest oil boom and had over 40,000 residents. The oil boom has caused many problems in North Dakota such as increasing the crime and social problems, housing and roads. There is a lot of wear and tear on the roads, because of the thousands of trucks that are hauling oil, water and other fracking components. According to the Department of Transportation, the state has invested $1.16 billion into the roads.
Proposition P================ Propostion P was advanced by an advocacy group known as the Santa Barbara Water Guardians, mainly to prohibit the usage of hydraulic fracturing (i.e fracking) within Santa Barbara, threatening its water supply. As such, Proposition P is absolutely essential, not only to ensuring the health of residents in Santa Barbara, but to ensuring long term social, economic, and environmental stability. Where opponents to Proposition P may tend to make arguments which solely favor the number of jobs in the community, or which perhaps presume the importance of the oil industry in Santa Barbara, over other concerns in the community, these other concerns need to be considered more fully in order to illustrate why support of Proposition P is absolutely essential.================
Alaska is a place for pioneers, and no more so than today as the state faces this century’s biggest challenges—energy development and climate change. Just as they did 30 years ago when the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline System jump-started their oil economy, residents of the Last Frontier are surveying their options and reinventing themselves. Resource extraction still dominates the state, but citizens and politicians are now engaging in open discussions about how new mining, drilling, and pipeline projects will impact the environment. Damage from melting permafrost is proving that rising temperatures affect people and jobs as well as polar bears. Backpackers should pay attention to Alaska, and not only because its peaks and glaciers inspire those
Hydraulic Fracturing, otherwise known as fracking is the process of injecting large amounts of sand, water, and other chemicals into the shale rocks deep beneath the ground in order to flow natural gas back onto the surface of the well. This process was invented in the early 1900s, and has been controversial ever since. There are two sides to the debate, one being that fracking is known to be horrible for the environment. Fracking has caused families to need to be displaced, and emitted thousands of toxic chemicals into the air causing major public health issues. At the same time, fracking has reduced the reliability on coal, which is known to be horrible for the environment; it has also brought hundreds of thousands of gallons of natural gas
The potential economical and cleaner energy growth is what drives you to use unsafe, and poorly regulated growth, which is fracking. To get the resources beneath the earth is not the problem or blocking the resources that makes America less dependable form foreign oil. Using hydraulic method to bring natural gas is not a safe practices. Hydraulic Fracturing is the moderately new procedure of gas from the earth’s floor. It is costly and dangerous, however there 's a chance to increase mass measures of vitality that could offer America some assistance with becoming substantially more vitality free.
But, really keeping alive these issues of environmental disasters and the need for national legislation were the events themselves and the media really jumped on one after another. In the 1970s there was the 3-mile island accident which is essentially a nuclear reactor that came very close to having a meltdown in Pennsylvania. Due to some errors and a malfunction they released radioactivity into the air and over several days they planted thousands of gallons of radioactive water into the Saxton’s river. Children and pregnant women were evacuated and all sorts of reports of disability in children followed the years of events there.
The ever-changing environment that surrounds us is another influence of mine. The environment is currently suffering from pollution and we humans are creating a mass of it. Emissions from manufacturing plants, the burning of fossil fuels, and household and farm chemicals are all ways humans are polluting the environment. And this issue has brought upon great concern for me as well as many others.
External Analysis: Microenvironment Introduction The two major competitive factors controlling the external environment are the Macro and the Micro environments. While the Macro deals with the PESTLE affects, the Micro environment deals with the current structure of the industry and the effect of the roles played by the giants of the industry. Figure A-1 The Microenvironment includes the effect of rivalry, suppliers, buyers, distributors and the general public towards the strategy formulation by the company.
