ipl-logo

Male's Speech Rhetorical Analysis

1067 Words5 Pages

In general, which respects to sex differences, Margaret Mead says that although many societies are different in the way that they treat men and women, every culture has some “societal” standards for each sex which distance from the biological differences (Henley and Thorne 43).
It exists a global stereotype about women which is the low power they have in comparison to men in society since males tend to be more dominant and they try to have a figure of a ruler. “Women are often more supportive, polite, and expressive, talk more about home and family, and use more words implying feeling, evaluation, interpretation, and psychological state” (Adelaide Haas 616). Haas suggested four different aspects, such as, form, topic, content and use of the …show more content…

It exists a tendency on men that they use for their own benefits. That strategy is the interruption, a way of talking first when other is talking at the same time. In conversations between males and females, men interrupt women and women allow it (Henley and Thorne 16). This proves the strength of dominance in men and for this reason , women are seen as “powerless victims” and men as excluding and dominating women (Thomas and Wareing 79).
The same structure made before with women is also used to analyze men’s speech, following the four different aspects: form, topic, content and use of language.
Respect to the form, men language tend to be more direct. Jespersen observed that men have any difficulty to talk about any issue. They use new terms, slang expressions, and also obscene words (Haas 616). Lakoff also observed that men use strong words and expressions such as “shit” and “damn”. According to Austin, males produce low and nasal sounds instead of the high ones of women (Haas …show more content…

Moore reported that man-to-man topics included money and business (48%), amusements or sports (14%), and other men (13%). With these percentages is proved that men talk more about other topics instead of people. But the data does not reflect the present topics since the data is collected from the 1920s (Haas 620).
According to the content, Lakoff listed some adjectives as “great, terrific and neat” which are also generally used by men (Haas 2621). Wood made an analysis of the speech of 36 college students (18 men and 18 women) as they described photographs of a man's face. She could see that males referred mainly to what was actually in the picture but females were more interpretative and tended to be more subjective in their descriptions (Haas 621). Haas concludes saying that “men use more terms referring to time, space, quantity, destructive action, and perceptual attributes and more objective cases” (Haas

Show More
Related

Challenger Speech Rhetorical Analysis

776 Words | 4 Pages

emotional appeal by going back in history telling everyone that this is not the first time astronauts died in space mission, this comforts the public about risks astronauts take to do their job, this may not appeal for those who were skeptical about the program at the beginning, rather it is to gain more support for NASA. He used “courage’ and “brilliant” those words were carefully chosen to evoke patriotism as well as persuade broader audience. Finely closes his Pathos by naming the astronauts one by one. Naming them individually he’s trying connect with each family personally.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Who Does The Talking Here By Deborah Tannen

710 Words | 3 Pages

Of all the 70 scientific studies Tannen could have chosen to talk about, the number of which she releases later in her paper, her choice of these two serves to demonstrate how biased and varied in results the scientific studies on this topic have been in the past. This helps Tannen justify the need for her article on the subject as it gives reason to why the issue on which gender speaks more still has not yet been resolved. Later in her essay, Tannen uses the results of a survey done by Campbell Leaper and Melanie Ayres on the results of 70 studies published in scientific journals several times. Her first use of their results follows her statements on the studies talked about earlier in this paper, noting that they “found that counting words yielded no consistent differences”. She then goes on to say, “Campbell and Ayres note that many studies find women doing more ‘affiliative

Read More

Sex And Temperament Analysis

742 Words | 3 Pages

Critique of “Sex and Temperament” and “From Undoing Gender” Margaret Mead’s “Sex and Temperament” is an essay to explain how there are differences between genders everywhere but they are not the same throughout the world. While Judith Butler’s excerpt from “Undoing Gender” is about the existence of gender normalities effects on how people are viewed in society. These two essays are very similar because of the similar presentations of ideas and the similar ideas of the two women. I chose to compare these two because of the similarity in their topics and how they presented them. Such as the ideas of gender differences, their research is based on analysis of different situations , and the effect the idea of gender norms have on society and they way we view others.

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis

1122 Words | 5 Pages

Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.

Read More

Summary Of Sex Lies And Conversation By Deborah Tannen

703 Words | 3 Pages

Socio-linguist Deborah Tannen demonstrates how men and women communicate differently in her essay “Sex, Lies and Conversation: Why Is It So Hard for Men and Women to Talk to Each Other?” In her observations of communication styles, she discusses the way in which men and women communicate leads them to conflict because they have different understanding of their partners’ role. She also explains male and female communication differences not only cause ineffective conversation, but also push couples into a dilemma in their relationship; however, as men and women better understand the differences, their relationship improves. In the first part of her essay, Tannen discusses men and women do not have enough effective communication, which damages their marriage.

Read More

Public Speaking Rhetorical Analysis

145 Words | 1 Pages

Thank you for the response. I feel heard and thank you for thoughtfully considering my concerns. I think that you are 100% right in your summary about the works, and it is reassuring to know that you too felt like washing your hands after reading it haha. I will also be sure to be on the lookout for any feelings of victimization in the forum and to try and help dismantle it. I might not have spoken up, but in the Public Speaking class taught by Kelly Nickel, we were asked to alert our listeners of any speech topic that might traumatize our classmates so as to give them an option as to whether to stay and listen.

Read More

Deborah Tannen How Male And Female Students Use Language Differently

383 Words | 2 Pages

Morghan Renfrow Instructor C. Shackelford English 1113, Section 101 1 September 2016 Analysts of “How Male and Female Students Use Language Differently” An essay written by Deborah Tannen called “How male and females students use language differently”, is describing how they talk and interact with others. The writer presents different studies on how language changes based on a certain person. The essay states that men are more aggressive and talkative, while women are calm and modest about talking about the views they share.

Read More

Sex Lies And Conversation Analysis

807 Words | 4 Pages

Sex, Lies and Conversation There are many differences between a man and woman, communication is just one difference. Deborah Tannen, a University of California graduate, got her PhD in linguistics at Georgetown University; there she studied the communication between men and women. Tannen has published over one hundred articles and wrote over twenty books, including You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation (1990), which spent almost four years on the New York Times best seller list and was translated into twenty-nine languages. The article Sex, Lies and Conversation appeared in the Washington Post in 1990 and gives insight to how opposite sexes communicate with each other. From an early age we are programed to play and be friends with the same gender as our own.

Read More

Deborah Tannen Can T We Talk Analysis

451 Words | 2 Pages

Tannen’s piece analyzes how men and women differ in their conversational skills, and how most instances of miscommunication are because of these

Read More

The American Scholar Rhetorical Analysis

673 Words | 3 Pages

Often known as the Father of American Literature to many educated individuals, Ralph Waldo Emerson in his oration “The American Scholar” brilliantly provides a sublime example of how Emerson earned his title through the appliance of diction, syntax, allusions, and many other rhetorical devices and strategies. Indicated towards his highly educated audience, the Phi Beta Kappa Society, Emerson introduces the idea that the common class and common concepts of everyday life are becoming the future of art and literature through purpose, credibility, and tone. As many great writers, Emerson does not simply tell about his idea, but instead uses rhetorical strategies to help show his central point, one such strategy being purpose. Being focused on informing his audience of the coming days, the use of purpose can be

Read More

Margaret Mead Sex And Temperament

348 Words | 2 Pages

Sex and Temperament Summary In Margaret Mead 's book "Sex and Temperament" she displays that individuals of various societies contradict the meaning of being brawny versus ladylike. Mead observed three primitive societies to compare their temperament differences. Mead claims that masculinity and feminism are not specific to either gender, but depends on the expectations and social qualities of the individuals culture. If a woman is equal to or better at something than a man, the man will question his own manhood; If a man is better than a woman at something, the woman will judge the man or extremely dislike the man.

Read More

Judgments: Improper Speech With Black Males

1308 Words | 6 Pages

From the first moment we see a person, we make judgements about them. Everything they do shapes our opinions about who they are, even if we don’t know about them. A person’s linguistic style can also shape our judgements about them. The problem with linguistics is that often we associate ways of talking with things such as gender or race. One significant issue is the fact that when someone talks proper, it is often associated with being white, and when one doesn’t talk properly, it is associated with being black.

Read More

Marxism And Gender Inequality

1139 Words | 5 Pages

Sex and gender are the two terms used for identification of masculinity and femininity among humans in our daily life. Sex is the biological term that determines the biological and “anatomical” differences between male and female species. It also clarifies the primary and secondary sex characteristics a person should have in order to be male or female. However, gender is a socially and culturally constructed term that delineates the distinction between men and women and their roles in the society. Gender is also used to organize relationships between man and women in social life.

Read More

Evolution Of Masculinity In Society

1306 Words | 6 Pages

Men are associated in an essential and optional way with the confidence certain aspects are completed when deciding their masculinity and manliness. These aspects range from not crying when they are harm. They can be aggressive and play violent games. The socialization of manhood in our public begins as early as the main phases of the first stages. Masculinity in America is very difficult for many men because they have to hide their true feelings.

Read More

The Genderlect Theory: Explaining Communication Between Men And Women

1816 Words | 8 Pages

One of these perspectives is analyzing communication through gender. In the book, You Just Don’t Understand, Deborah Tannen (1990) popularized the term “genderlect” to describe the way in which men and women communicate with each other. She suggested that men and women have different styles of conversing, forming two distinct dialects. In a review of Tannen’s book, DeFrancisco (1992) attributed the differing communication styles of men and women to the respective cultures in which they grow up. Because of such gender differences, misunderstanding between men and women creates a gap in the communication process.

Read More

More about Male's Speech Rhetorical Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document