More handpicked essays just for you.
Genetic Modification of Human BeingsGenetic Modification of Human Beings
Genetic engineering in humans
Genetic modification of human beings
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There is the chance that cloning may be able to better how humans live. “ Will it produce more good than harm or vice versa? This is true of cloning as well. Cloning is by no means the first technology that has been widely debated. It is, however, among the first to be so controversial before it is even possible to achieve.
As a society we are adapting, changing, and growing every day. Genetic modification is happening; many people are just not aware. Genetic engineering is great for society because it can cause many new advancements for the as in world with no diseases and a world without hunger. “There is a good case for exploring all ideas relevant to our current concerns, no matter where they lead” (Pinker 533). Although no one knows how far genetic enhancing and cloning could go makes it a dangerous idea, does not mean as a society that we ignore it.
Mike Pence, an American politician and the current Governor of Indiana once stated, “Human Cloning is coming”(Pence 1). This creates an anxious atmosphere that leave societies questioning if the knowledge, consequences, and ethics are even a reasonable approach towards the idea of cloning. Both “The Birthmark” by Nathaniel Hawthorne and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, have themes that convey a meaning not to mess with nature’s creations. These two literary examples are evidence that cloning obviously has a vast and unpredictable outcome that are not to be ignored. Moreover, cloning is a highly questionable pursuit of science that may lead to possible destruction if not monitored carefully.
Mankind has always been motivated by the desire for progress, accomplishment, and empowerment. The exceptionally steep rate of technological development during the twentieth century starting with the invention of the zeppelin in 1900 and advancing to the creation of more sophisticated technologies such as the world wide web is evidence of this truth. In the midst of all of these impressive innovations, biological scientists developed recombinant DNA techniques that gave them the power to alter genetic material. As biotechnology has become more refined and the application of genetic engineering in both agricultural and medical fields has become more common, the practice has fallen victim to harsh scientific and ethical scrutiny. The debate is
“After 4 billion years of evolution by the slow and clumsy method of natural selection, we have now evolved to the point where we can direct our own evolution” (Gattaca). Being able control genetic engineering seems like a crazy, unattainable vision. However, dystopian worlds reveal that the process of selecting desirable traits prior to birth could become a reality in the near future. Attempting to coexist in such a society would undoubtedly create many challenges. In both the film Gattaca and the novel Brave New World, genetic engineering divides society and limits the opportunities of the lower classes.
One professor explains that cloning would allow us to “design our descendants” (Guerra 4), which would “open up the larger questions about the overall desirability of the biotech project” (Guerra 4). As Guerra says, once we begin cloning, we will not be able to stop and will eventually reach the point of Brave New World. As biotechnology advances, we are failing to see the possible consequences of altering human nature and are moving quickly towards a society like that of Huxley’s
In the movie “Gattaca”, directed by Andrew Niccol, Niccol indicates how in the future we are going to depend on technology. As well as in how we are going to become more of an unrealized expectation. It was demonstrated as genetic engineering. For example, they would get a piece of what you wanted your child to have such as height, gender, and skills. Which is bad in my opinion, Therefore, I will have to say that I disagree with the use of wanting to use Genetic engineering for childbirth for the following reasons.
As Maya Angelou once said “In diversity there is beauty and there is strength.” Though diversity exists in the world today, that could diminish due to the downfalls caused by human cloning. There may be controversy surrounding human cloning, but the consequences will desolate society if the issues with it are not addressed. In Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, a scientist obsessed with life animates a creature who becomes evil from society treatment. Moreover, in “The Birthmark,” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, a newly married scientist becomes obsessed with a hand shaped birthmark on his wife’s cheek, which leads him to attempt to remove it but to no avail, as he ends up killing her.
Once everyone understands and respects the different philosophies we should listen to more of Kass’s advice, we must not allow the use of technology to grow with self-increasing limits. Instead, we need to use moral, intellectual, spiritual, and political rule to be certain that we are making the right decisions. Specifically it is essential that we focus on human freedom and dignity. For example, it worries me that a small number of scientists could increase their rule over a huge number of individuals by using genetic technology, resulting in decreased human freedom. A solution to this problem would be everyone using moral, intellectual, and spiritual rules in a political setting to make sure that a large number of voices are heard.
Modern society has been able to come up with ways of cloning people which is similar of the idea that Huxley had while writing Brave New World.
The clones are continuously misunderstood as a result, their humanity disregarded, and their individuality crushed to a point where they are completely controlled by society. Though the dystopian society depicted in Never Let Me Go can be seen as simply a science-fiction invention, it could become a reality, depending on the course of science and progress. Every day, people die in need of organs that simply are not available to them. In keeping a sense of morality in scientific research, potentially harmful tests are often carried out on animals, rather than real human beings, compromising the relevance of test results in some ways. The creation of human cones could be a solution to both these issues, and as society and the scientific community evolve over time, the perspective of the majority regarding human cloning could change drastically.
Aldous Huxley is saying cloning is evolving more everyday, and the stake of an individual human is at risk than
In today’s society ideas of cloning a person are considered taboo; however in Huxley’s novel it is present constantly until the
Fukuyama brings up topics that can be split into two categories: risks and benefits of genetic engineering along with the affordability of genetic engineering. Considering scientists aren’t entirely sure how genes work, they bring about several ills they wouldn’t be aware of, whether they be immediate ills or ills that show up much later (Fukuyama, 678). Genetic Engineering could have horrific effects on a population which could lead to the abandoning of genetic modification, just like in the way that hydroelectricity is no longer used as much because of the potential of dam breaks or environmental effects (Fukuyama, 680). There is also a possibility that only the rich will have access to this technology, so the state would possibly have to intervene to fix this inequality (Fukuyama, 680). Fukuyama concludes his writing by posing the fact that no matter what happens with genetic engineering, genetic engineering will change the course of human history on several levels, and on levels greater than that of any human biotechnology (Fukuyama, 681).
The procedure putting another extra clone gene to the mom’s womb and growing is not easy and sometimes it can cause moms and the child 's death. Because we want a clone baby doesn’t mean we want to kill the moms so it is irrelevant and hazardous. Peoples want to believe that we shouldn 't be afraid of cloning babies or having engineered baby, but however people connected to their religion and didn’t want to mess with their god(religion) so because of that most of the people didn’t want to accept this technology. As seen in the (Caplan’s) article, scientists are using CRISPR CAS9 to make a new engineered baby. This tool helps to edit genes in animals and insects and now it also works on human to modify their genes and to enter the new gene to make clone babies.the intriguing instance of genetic modification was that there is a lot of controversies and agreements in human cloning.
