George Clooney: A Villain In The Film

777 Words4 Pages

A movie does not have to be good in order to catapult talent it just have to be interesting. It may awfully compare to other films released on the same date, but it the film catches your attention it may become more than just mare scenes put together. This movie is one example of how a low finance movie can do marvelous things for the careers of those involve in the movies. This movie did great things for the cast and crew despite being so mediocre. After a bank heist in Abilene with several casualties, the bank robber Seth Gecko and his psychopath and rapist brother Richard Gecko continue their crime spree in a convenience store in the middle of the desert while heading to Mexico with a hostage. They decide to stop for a while in a low-budget motel. Meanwhile the former minister Jacob Fuller is traveling on vacation with his son Scott and …show more content…

When you think about his career it would never occur to you that he would be in the movie where he fights for his life by killing vampires, but everyone needs a start. Clooney does a good job in the movie he is as ruthless as needed and those a good antihero archetype. Probably he should be a villain in one of those action movies that someone is creating probably he would be a great role in it this movie show the potential for it.

Quentin Tarantino (Richard) this famous director from time to time has the bug of acting and this is one of those times. He also had the opportunity of adapting the story of the movie into a screenplay. As an actor Tarantino lefts a lot to be desire he does not have the skills to have a convincing role. He does a more creative and rewarding role as writer of the movie as he does put the dialogue needed to fit this type of movie. He was far from making more complex films as he is now, but he needed time to polish his