ipl-logo

George Fitzhugh And The Political And Social Outbreak Of The Civil War

793 Words4 Pages

The Civil War was one of the most famous and pivotal time periods in American history. It was a time when a country, created to stand together against England, turned against each other. On the one hand, there was the North, which became home to the Federal officers. Down below was the South, the Confederates. It was the ideology of slavery, particularly the arguments of George FitzHugh and the Fugitive Slave Act which made the Civil War inevitable and necessary. Both of these elements worked together to fuel the political and social controversy to split the country into two. This paper will discuss how the psychological workings of FitzHugh and the political and social turmoil of the Fugitive Slave Act worked together to make the Civil War …show more content…

In the economic sphere, the South depended on slavery to run their economy and their plantations. The North was focused on industrialization where business and machinery could operate without the need for manual labor. The justification of the South was not only economical, it was psychological as well. George FitzHugh is a key figure for the South and the ideology they had towards it. FitzHugh’s argument was that to go against slavery, is to go against religion and the Bible, the “Holy Writ”, which is the law of the land which allows human beings to be slaves to one another. The rarity of the practice results in the assumption and the “general truth” that slave and master must be of a different race. Slaves, particularly black people, are of an inferior race. They are uncivilized, and savage, and white civilized men have a duty to the Bible and to society to civilize these people by making them affectionate and faithful …show more content…

The Fugitive Slave Act was a law enacted to allow the recapturing of all fugitive slaves. Under this Act, no free slave was safe. Slaves who had risked their lives were under threat of being caught by slave hunters. The Act also contained ludicrous provisions. First, it denied any alleged fugitive any right to jury trial. Secondly, the Northerners believed that the other provisions inevitably turned people into full blown man hunters. The Fugitive Slave Act became something greater than just ensuring slaves won’t run away again; it became a way to recover slaves who ran away in the past. Under the Act, many cases arose of black slaves who lived in free-state communities being torn away from their families with no chance of a fair trial. These former slaves were left with “inadequate safeguards”, which exposed them to such dangers as kidnapping. All of these cases of injustice fueled the cause of the Abolitionists in the North. They used the Act as propaganda value and focused all of their energy towards using it against the South. The Abolitionists from the North had New England Puritan ideologies, had a long tradition of preserving the good against the evil. The people upholding and supporting the Fugitive Slave Act were regarded to as religiously “evil” and “wicked”. So, when southerners sent to get their fugitive slaves back from the North, it caused trouble. “Dramatic episodes” resulted in fugitive slaves

Show More
Related
157 Words | 1 Pages

The first document Advocates Slavery, George Fitzhugh states that he supported slavery. Before the American Civil War pro-slavery forces changed from protecting the idea of slavery and explaining it to be a positive idea. Fitzhugh insisted that African Americans were childish people that needed protection. Other people believed that black people were not able to live out in free world. Fitzhugh said that “the negro race is inferior to the white race, and living in their midst, they would be far outstripped or outwitted in the chaos of free competition."

Read More
89 Words | 1 Pages

The Fugitive salve act was an act passed by the US Government in response to slaves escape from their slave masters. The law briefly stated that if the run away slave be caught by any of the free northern solider, They shall be handed back to their slave master in the south and the law also stated that the northern people will have to abide by that same law. This law should be considered unbearable. I personally would not abide with this law. There should be no such law.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

For many years leading to the Civil War slavery has been an ongoing argument between the North and the South. Both regions have their own arguments for either side of their cases. The North was strongly against the idea of enslaving human beings while the South saw the advantages of owning slaves. James Henry Hammond demonstrates that slaves are less beneficial to the economy because they cost more than free labor, although he does contradict himself, Hinton Rowan continues to explain the North demand for southern merchandise.

Read More
1342 Words | 6 Pages

In the years of 1820s through the 1860s, a growing sectional conflict centered around slavery signaled the coming of a war between the north and the south, which almost tore down the union. According to some revisionist historians, Civil War, one of the greatest tragedies in the American history, was absolutely avoidable and resulted merely from “fanaticism and misunderstanding,” along with the failure of the political leaders to compromise; however, this is not the case. Looking back into history, the war was arguably made inevitable by the the cause of slavery. A series of factors in the antebellum age led to the outbreak of Civil War; these factors included social differences, economic issues, as well as political tensions generated by

Read More
443 Words | 2 Pages

Roger Taney was the chief justice from 1836- 1864. He made the ruling for the Dred Scott case. The ruling that sent northerns into a blaze and led southern 's to rejoice. Dred Scott was a slave, who was taken to a free territory. Taney ruled that slaves were property and that they didn’t have the right to sue as it says in document number 9.

Read More
2021 Words | 9 Pages

Meeting A Need In 1850, congress passed the Fugitive Slave Act. This act gave slave masters the right to call on federal, state, and local law enforcement to return runaway slaves. The act, “Permitted for the seizure and return of runaway slaves who escaped from one state and fled into another” (Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d.). This act was frequently misused by slave owners in the 50s.

Read More
286 Words | 2 Pages

George Fitzhugh argues that slavery was justified. Two of his arguments in defense of slavery are the Africans are foolish, and slavery in America is safer and better than slavery in Africa. While many people believed his arguments to be right, Fitzhugh is wrong. If Africans are foolish, wouldn’t you want to teach them instead of enslaving them? Fitzhugh states in paragraph two of The Universal law of slavery, “He would become an insufferable burden to society.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

George Fitzhugh stands among the most prominent advocates for slavery during this time for which he voiced a unique justification of its practice. In his perspective, Fitzhugh stated that it is in the best interest of slaves to be governed and looked over, comparing the slave to that of a child. Furthermore, he insists that "the negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and, in some sense, the free people in the world" (Fitzhugh 1846). The popular saying, "Just ask me how happy my slaves are," is often aligned with this explanation for slavery as well.  

Read More
442 Words | 2 Pages

During the Civil War era, many were for slavery and found nothing wrong about it. While others were skeptical about slavery. Along with multiple people who were still completely against it. Fitzhugh wanted everyone to agree with the idea of slavery. “ Everyone admits that in such countries the poor need protection.

Read More
2124 Words | 9 Pages

It was conceived to force states to deliver escaped slaves to slave owner’s violated states ' rights due to state sovereignty and was believed that seizing state property should not be left up to the states. The Fugitive Slave Clause states that escaped slaves "shall be delivered up on claim of the arty to which such Service or labour may be due". During the

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

Fitzhugh 's "The Universal Law of Slavery" is a pro-slavery work. Fitzhugh attempts to defend slavery by saying, "He the Negro is but a child, and must be governed as a child" (1621). He also goes on to say, "The negro race is inferior to the white race" (1621). These points are meant to explain why slavery is necessary. However, these points only go to show Fitzhugh 's ignorance.

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

Fugitive Slave Law grew the population of the abolitionist because some free blacks were accused of being an escaped from the South. This was not fair to the free blacks that did not have the documents that stated that they were a free man or woman when the commissioner took them to a court. The final reason why the Fugitive Slave Law, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, and the abolitionist movement are connected is that Uncle Tom’s Cabin was influenced by the Fugitive Slave Law. The facts of Uncle Tom’s Cabin come from the daughter of an abolitionist, not only that, but the Fugitive Slave Law come before Uncle Tom’s Cabin was fully composed.

Read More
144 Words | 1 Pages

(a) Fugitive Slave Law of 1850, stirred up a storm of opposition in the North. The fleeing slaves could not testify in their own behalf and they were denied a jury trial. The federal commissioner who handled the case of a fugitive would receive five dollars if the slaves were freed and ten dollars if not. Freedom-loving northerners who aided the slave to escape were liable to heavy fines and jail sentences and Northerns also considered the “Man-Stealing Law”. The North didn 't like the Fugitive slave law because they were against slavery and North states were free, but the South states were slaves and southerners dislike the Northern struggle to enforcing it; because they wanted their slaves returned.

Read More
930 Words | 4 Pages

Unpaid labor, harsh conditions, severe punishment, and blatant racism make up the institution of slavery. In the Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, Frederick Douglass writes about his own experiences as a slave. He describes his masters, jobs, and how the institution of slavery negatively affected slaves. Coming from the opposite perspective, George Fitzhugh writes in his essay, Slavery Justified, how slavery was good for slaves and their societies. However, slavery is not justifiable and none of the arguments Fitzhugh makes are legitimate.

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

This lead to the south growing more and more furious with the north because their slaves would be set free legally by merely entering the free state. So as a way to mend the relationship between the two sides, a bill was passed to do away with slaves getting their freedom. The fugitive slave bill of 1850 dealt a major blow to the Underground Railroad, making every escape attempt an ever greater challenge. This bill made it so that any escaped found in the north had to be sent back to their owner immediately without any trial. Slave owners and northern citizens were both allowed and “encouraged to form hunting parties to find and bring back any escaped slaves”(“Fugitive slave act of 1850”).

Read More

More about George Fitzhugh And The Political And Social Outbreak Of The Civil War

Open Document