George Ravitch No Child Left Behind Analysis

634 Words3 Pages

In this chapter, Ravitch discusses some of the various education plans (federal) and their failures. She also looks at No Child Left Behind Act established by George W. Bush, which promised a new high standards (education), testing and accountability in which not a single child would be overlooked or left behind. When the program was first announced, there was a great deal of excitement and optimism, as Bush had established a similar program in Texas, which had a great deal of success. The No Child Left Behind Act was very complex and it consisted of many programs, but its central focus was simple: accountability. Both Democrats and Republicans believed that accountability “was the lever that would raise achievement scores.” In previous years, both parties constantly bemoaned the lack of accountability in American public education and claimed that no teacher, principal, or student was ever held accountable for poor test scores. In theory, No Child Left Behind would change that. Ravitch, who was at first an advocate of the program, eventually realized that the aims of the No Child Left Behind act were impossible to …show more content…

This not only in the US ,because in Ghana, I realize the exams given are set in order to pass a certain category of students and make others fail, so that they would for extra classes, buy text books and also pay exams fees to re-sit the test they failed. There are a lot of adult interests in the education system, people look to profit from the future of students, example businesses like Pearson and Princeton which are publishing companies. Also I realized that lot teachers are forced to teach for test only and this also happens in Ghana where teachers are paid in regards to how many students passed in their