More specifically, this source is intended for the supporters of the Oppian law and male dominance, not so much the supporters of women equality. The genres of this written document are law and history. Through the debate between Marcus Porcius Cato and Lucius Valerius, Livy explains the Oppian law and the different views of women’s’ roles in Roman society at that time in history. Although Livy is somewhat bias towards men, his style choice provides insight to both sides of the debate instead of just his view, which increases the reliability of the source. The style of the source also increases the appreciation for the content because the people that agree with the law and the people that oppose the law can relate to the source.
This quote explains how the Germans did not see the value and importance in the resource, amber. This also proves that the Romans saw themselves as superior to the Germans as Tacitus actually calls the Germanic tribes barbaric. The Germans were also criticized for their religious practices of sacrificing a man as a religious holiday at a certain time of the year and torturing him (Germania 13). I agree that this holiday is barbaric and innocuous, but this is specifically highlighted as a barbaric practice, and the ancient Romans also had some practices that definitely seem to be barbaric, such as public executions of criminals.
The Romans emerged from Italy and formed their culture that can find its roots among an array of native tribes and Greek colonies that populated Italy. There are two parts of the foundation of a Roman’s identity that stemmed from the cultural influences that produced the Romans, their culture and their ideals. The first component of the foundation of the Roman identity is the usage and the incorporation of others’ myths into their own etiological myth. The second part stems from these myths that made the Romans believe that their existence and success was the result of fate. By looking into Virgil’s Aeneid and Sallust’s Conspiracy of Catiline one can see that this two-part foundation produced a society and people that embodied this idea that they were the best parts of all the cultures
This is different from the Roman structure in that the emperor had complete power, and the senate held power over everyone else because of their financial status. Although the citizens of Rome could elect their officials and consuls, not everyone was considered a citizen unlike the tribespeople of Rhineland. In particular, women had an immensely higher status and role in Germanic society, starting with the fact that they were considered “citizens”. In the eyes of the men, their mothers and wives were the “most sacred witnesses of his bravery”, and were the healers and caregivers of them all6.
Odysseus should not be granted an award for being a good leader in the Odyssey Although he fought well and won many battles he still made some very selfish decision 's. The Choices that the so called "Great" leader made caused the innocent solders to lose their life 's Odysseus chose to think by him self and not discuss with his mates about his dangerous ideas. Odysseus is A man know from the city/island of Troy, he is a so called leader, knight and great fighter. One of his selfish decisions that he made was when him and the soilders wandered into the cave of the cyclops, his soldiers suggested that they should take some food and leave, while Odysseus deiced to stay longer and examine the cyclops cave, This is were things get worse, as
Often, human sacrifices were made to please Mercury. Suebians also made human sacrifices of Roman soldiers to Nerthus, Hercules and Mars, however, were more appeased with lawful offerings of animal sacrifices. In Germania, Publius Cornelious Tacitus analyzes the culture of the tribes in the region, in order to aid in the development of the Roman empire. Although he is writing about Germania in a way which makes it seem as though he favors their ways, the major purpose is to persuade the Roman empire into strengthening their culture through intimidation. Tacitus believed their barbaric style of warfare, loyalty to their chief, and views on marriage are desirable qualities to better
In this paper I will argue that the text was intended for Christians instead of the Romans based on the way Perpetua is praised in the text and how Perpetua’s disobedience towards her father who was the paterfamilias was most shocking to the Romans. Essentially this autobiography was written for Christian’s, particularly for those who were or later
ustice, fairness, and decency, abstract concepts that are innate in society and human nature. However, despite their near universal status in humanities mid, they often have different meanings for individuals. Aeschylus uses The Oresteia in order to explore these issues as characters in the play try to determine what it means to be just, what ought a just actor do, and what is the best model for achieving justice. The characters discuss ideas such as vengeance, reciprocity, balance, moderation, and finally the end result of the implied debate leads to a jury system. In this paper I will go over two of the several different interpretations of justice used in the Oresteia and compare and contrast them in order to demonstrate which is the best
The death of King Prasutagus marked the end of Celtic Britain’s amicable collaboration with the Romans and consequently resulted in an immense abuse of power in the Roman treatment of the Celtic tribes. This served as the foundation for the Celtic rebellion, which was then stimulated into a revolt following the abuse of Prasutagus’s widow Boudicca, and the raping of their two daughters. Boudicca’s desire to seek vengeance served as a catalyst for the uprising against Rome, with the hostile treatment of the Celts providing justification for further rebellion amongst the tribes. The end of the client kingdom following Prasutagus’s death led to exceedingly aggressive behaviour from the Romans in terms of their treatment of the Celts, monopolising on their positions of power to intimidate the tribes and force them into a state of submission. After deciding to ignore Prasutagus’s will, the Romans not only forged a position of vindictive power and authority amongst the Celts, but also crafted a toxic environment which resulted in a constant underlying sense of collective resentment within the tribes.
The cult of Isis originated at the time of the Egyptian Old Kingdom. From this time until her acceptance in Rome, the influence of Isis and her meaning changed and grew. During Egypt’s Old Kingdom, Isis’ role was a funerary one. She had a relatively small amount of influence in Egyptian religion, garnering most of what she had from her husband Osiris, god of the dead. Worship of Isis was constricted to funerary rituals.
Book Three covers the Flavian campaign till Vitellius's death. Book Four covers the beginning of Vespasian's reign, Civilis's revolt, and the start of A.D. 70. Book Five includes a brief, inaccurate description of the Jewish people and their history and the end of Civilis's revolt. Tacitus's viewpoint is the most important part of this work; he was a Roman senator, consul, and governor who was only fourteen during the year A.D. 69. He had first and second-hand knowledge of Rome lost on modern historians.
Tacitus saw Germans as doing things out of necessity not out of greed and
In her chapter on the historiography of Roman exemplarity, Christina Shuttleworth Kraus examines this loss of power through the transition of exempla as the res gestae populi Romani to the res gestae divi Augusti (Kraus, 2). In early Roman history, exemplarity rested in the hands of popular consciousness; the citizens of Rome had the sole power of deciding which events or people to raise up to the status of exempla. This system of exemplarity that is explained in detail by Matthew Roller’s four stage model of the creation of exempla by public discourse (Roller, 216-217). However, Roller’s framework begins to collapse when Augustus intentionally influences exemplary power through his coercive Res Gestae. Rather than looking to the past for the great deeds of common people like the Sabine women or Lucretia, Roman citizens of the Augustan period had their attention directed towards the persona of one man, an exemplar in the form of an emperor.
The virtue of piety was a defining characteristic in Roman life, Romans carried out their everyday lives in accordance of the ideas of pietas which is one’s duty to their family, God, and people; these Roman values are displayed in Virgil’s The Aeneid through the actions of the character Aeneas, and challenged further in the Gospel of Matthew by Jesus Christ. The word “pietas” is a Latin word that means dutifulness, and refers to the balanced duty to a person’s family, gods, and people in Roman culture. The Romans believed that for these duties to be upheld then it must be implemented in one’s everyday life, and this belief of the Romans separated them from other ancient societies. In The Aeneid, Aeneas engages in all aspects of pietas throughout his journey to Italy to become the ancestor to the city of Rome.
