Gettysburg Address Critique Essay

670 Words3 Pages

Lincoln’s “Gettysburg Address”: Critique In 1863, the Civil War was still taking place in the United States. During the Battle of Gettysburg, many lives were lost. Then President Abraham Lincoln, was given an opportunity to dedicate the ground where the battle was, to the men who died for their country. Lincoln took this opportunity to tell the American people about the Civil War, and how it was affecting the nation. His speech to the people persuaded the Union by putting the feeling of nationalism with the feeling of independence. The point of the speech was to dedicate the grounds to the men who served the country, and to use the effect of the battle to motivate the North to finish what the men started. In the “Gettysburg Address”, Abraham Lincoln talks about the men who risked their lives for their country should be honored and respected for what they did. It is up for the living to honor the brave men, and to finish what the men have started. Lincoln also says that the Civil War will test the limits of the United States, and any other country that is founded on the same guidelines as the United States. Lincoln’s speech is about honoring the dead, how the war will change …show more content…

Lincoln starts out by mentioning that the country was founded on liberty and dedication to what was believed in. This is shown when Lincoln says: “Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” (Lincoln 1). Throughout the speech this quote is mentioned often, mostly using words that are synonymous to dedicated. When Lincoln did this, he forced the people to feel nationalistic and proud to live in the country. Lincoln used the original purpose of the dedication ceremony and turned that into a way to make the Union motivated to fight for what they believe